If Operation REscue is Scrubbing Its Site, They Are Guilty Of Destroying Evidence

[WeDidIt]

Criminal acts could be occurring as I type this.

Clearly, Operation Rescue can no longer be considered an "activist organization".

The proper label must now be employed because they are engaged in criminal acts related to an act of terrorism.

Operation Rescue is a terrorist organization.

Shut them down!

[GreenPartyVoter]

1. Go to the wayback machine and see what might be there.

http://www.archive.org/index.php

[RandomThoughts]

2. google cache.

Probably all the articles are still there in the google cache, do a search and click on cache, you can still see any posts.

Articles can be read by using

Google search site:Operationrescue.org tiller

and clicking on cache below each link

[No DUplicitous DUpe]

4. Exactly, there is no way to "scrub" a web site. nt

[snot]

11. You're too optimistic. Wayback comes nowhere near to recording every pg on every site on every day.

If anyone thinks anything's being scrubbed, they need to go on and copy everything, with URL's, and save it with a note as to the date saved. If there's anything juicy, I'd save it both by copying the page you see, and also hit "View Source" and copy all of that for each page.

The NYT scrubbed its article on the 2004 "surprise" election results within a week after the election. Fortunately, I saved the paragraph they scrubbed. A lot of scrubbing of various sites also occurred during and after Katrina, which I and other DU'er's helped document.

Pls don't assume someone else has got it covered.

[LeftyMom]

3. I'm sure the feds keep track of changes to their site.

[Demeter]

5. Then You Are an Optimist

I'm positive they stay as far away as possible.

[LeftyMom]

6. No, I'm informed.

For reasons I don't really feel the need to get into (a quick glance at my journal should be enough to figure it out if you're curious,) I'm a bit more aware of how the feds monitor websites of groups they want to track than the average DUer.

They know what they're doing. They're not perfect, but they're certainly not going to miss something the average computer literate schlub can pick up, especially from a group that's caused as much prior trouble as OR.

[Demeter]

9. And Will There Be Any Consequences, Any Meaningful Action?

any upholding of the law? Any justice?

[LeftyMom]

10. Do I look like a prosecutor or a fortune teller?

Hell if I know. :shrug:

I'm just saying that the feds undoubtedly keep track of who posts what on OR's website.

[snot]

12. Got any examples? 'Cause I got a lot of examples of scrubbing; and I'd bet money

they weren't preserved elsewhere.

[Gman2]

7. As much as I hate freepers and freepville, they might be acting responsibly

just this once. Well, there are likely FBI directing it. They are not stupid, and they are not owned by Cheney anymore. It would be irresponsible to let his remarks remain there to encourage copycats.

[RandomThoughts]

8. Very good point, there are many good people in every organization that do responsible things.