This week, Simon Singh, one of Britain's best science writers, will decide whether to carry on playing a devilish version of Who Wants to be a Millionaire? He has already lost £100,000 defending his right to speak frankly. He could walk away. No one would think the worse of him if he did. Or he could go on and risk losing the full million by ensnaring himself in the rapacious world of an English judiciary that seems ever eager to bow to the demands of Saudi oil billionaires, Russian oligarchs and the friends of Saddam Hussein to censor critics and punish them with staggering damages and legal fees...
...In 2008, the British Chiropractic Association (BCA) announced that its members could help treat children with colic, sleeping and feeding problems, frequent ear infections, asthma and prolonged crying. Writing in the Guardian, Singh said the claim was "bogus". Chiropractic treatments may help relieve back pain, but Professor Ernst had examined 70 trials and found no evidence that they could relieve other conditions...
...Fair enough, you might think. Reputable medical authorities could test the evidence and decide whether the treatments work or not. Instead of arguing before the court of informed opinion, however, the BCA {British Chiropractic Association} went to the libel courts...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/31/simon-singh-science?showallcomments=trueIt is a wonder they have not gone after Consumer Reports as well, which (a few years ago) came to basically the same conclusion. Or, perhaps even more logically, after the National Association for Chiropractic Medicine which advocates for the use of chiropractic ONLY in musculoskeletal processes.
Oh, and before raising all the usual issues about chiropractic, please read:
http://www.chirobase.org/01General/controversy.htmlThe reason for the post is to illustrate how science is restrained by irrationality, and how the UK is becoming a threat to free speech throughout the world by encouraging libel-tourism.
Shame.