has a name and I've found more about him in this article from 2006. I don't know what his present legal status is today.
The Unaccountables From the September print issue -- Forget the soldiers: The 25,000 civilian contractors in Iraq are an occupying army unto themselves. Some may have engaged in torture -- and, by evident design, they can't be prosecuted for their crimes. Tara McKelvey | September 7, 2006
(see introduction and full article for full context )
In a January 18, 2004, statement in the Taguba report, detainee Kasim Mehaddi Hilas said he saw Nakhla sexually assault an Iraqi boy. Nakhla was “fucking a kid,” said Hilas. “His age would be about 15 to 18 years. The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets. Then when I heard the screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn't covered and I saw Abu Hamid who was wearing the military uniform, putting his dick in the little kid's ass … And the female soldier was taking pictures.”
Tabuga said he found the accounts “credible based on the clarity of their statements and supporting evidence provided by other witnesses.” He names Nakhla as a suspect in detainee abuse. But so far Nakhla has not been charged with any crime.
In July 2004, a U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) memo, released under the Freedom of Information Act, said Nakhla could be charged with aggravated sexual abuse. If he had been prosecuted, he could have been tried in a criminal court under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act -- most likely in the Eastern District of Virginia, where his case has apparently been investigated by the U.S. Attorney's office. But the investigation seems to be at a standstill.
A May Legal Times article by Jason McLure says the allegations against Nakhla have not stood up to scrutiny by the Department of Justice, and that prosecutors haven't been able to gather reliable evidence against him. The article cites one, unnamed government lawyer. It's not clear -- at least to two other attorneys who are familiar with Justice Department procedures -- whether the evidence against Nakhla is not panning out or whether the case is just not being aggressively pursued. Nakhla, his lawyer, and a spokeswoman in the U.S. Attorney's office all refused to comment.
Meanwhile, civil claims against Nakhla were dismissed in June because he doesn't live in the District of Columbia, where the case is being heard. Burke has asked Judge Robertson to reconsider his ruling on Nakhla, but even getting the case heard will be difficult. Robertson has dismissed many of the claims against Titan and CACI, including allegations that they were involved in a racketeering scheme. He has, however, allowed some claims against the contractors, including sexual assault and battery, to remain and has agreed to let the case go forward in a limited manner.
* * *
These days, Nakhla drives to work in a battered Toyota with a cross hanging from the rear-view window. On a May afternoon, he ambled through the shopping mall during a break from work and picked up a pizza. Nakhla has not had to answer questions from prosecutors about what he did -- or didn't do -- on the night shift at Abu Ghraib. As it looks now, he may never have to explain what happened. “It's certainly fair to say he hasn't been brought to justice,” says attorney Burke. “For him, it's over.”
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=11951 And here's an updated piece in 2008:
Abu Ghraib: The Outsourcing of TortureBy Tom Burghardt
Global Research,
July 6, 2008Antifascist Calling...
Will "outsourced" torture chickens finally come home to roost in American courts?
On June 30, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), Burke O'Neil LLC, of Philadelphia and Akeel & Valentine, PLC, of Troy, Michigan filed a series of lawsuits in federal district courts in Maryland, Ohio, Michigan and Washington state against über-contractors CACI International, Inc., CACI Premier Technology and L-3 Services Inc., a division of L-3 Communications Corporation.Monday's announcement by CCR follow close on the heels of a similar suit filed in May in federal district court in Los Angeles by Iraqi torture victim Emad al-Janabi, also against CACI International, Inc. and L-3 Communications. Named as a codefendant in the al-Janabi case is CACI interrogator, Steven Stefanowicz aka "Big Steve." Al-Janabi's attorneys claim that Stefanowicz directed some of the torture tactics deployed against their client, according to the Associated Press.
Al-Janabi told investigators that his "outsourced" interrogators punched him, slammed him into walls, hung him from a bed frame and kept him naked and handcuffed in "stress positions" in a filthy cell beginning in September 2003. Interviewed by The Associated Press in Istanbul, al-Janabi said:
"They (U.S. troops) did not tell me what was the reason behind my arrest ... during the interrogation, the American soldier told me I was a terrorist ... and I was preparing for an attack against the U.S. forces." (Greg Risling, "Iraqi Alleges Abu Ghraib Torture, Sues U.S. Contractor," The Associated Press, May 5, 2008)
Al-Janabi denied the allegations and told the Associated Press he was forced to give a false confession after "savage" intimidation by interrogators.
The latest suits, filed on behalf of four Iraqi civilians "wrongly imprisoned, tortured and later released without charge" from the notorious Abu Ghraib prison and torture center according to CCR, were filed in four separate jurisdictions in which the individual contractor defendants reside. Alleged torture practitioners named in the suit include "
Adel Nakhla, of Montgomery Village, Md., Timothy Dugan, of Pataskala, Ohio, and Daniel E. Johnson, of Seattle, Wash." The plaintiffs are:
(see article)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=9512 frm 2004:
New Abuse Report Shields IdentitiesBy Leon Worden
Signal City Editor
Thursday, August 26, 2004
*MEDIA—MANDATORY CREDIT: The Signal newspaper of Santa Clarita, Calif.
Three civilian translators were named in
a new report on military intelligence breaches at Abu Ghraib prison — although "named" isn't quite the right word.
All names were excised from the 177-page executive summary to the report on prisoner abuse, released Wednesday.
The three Titan translators are identified only as "Civilian-10," "Civilian-16" and "Civilian-17."
Civilian-10, a man, was exonerated.
"Civilian-10 is cleared of any wrongdoing and should retain his security clearance," the report said.
Civilian-16 is a woman. She is accused of failing to report abuses and threats she witnessed. The report recommends that the Army general counsel consider turning over her case to the Justice Department for prosecution.
The third Titan translator, Civilian-17, "actively participated in detainee abuse," the report states, and is also recommended for possible criminal charges.
In addition to being "present during the abuse of detainees depicted in photographs," Civilian-17 was accused of hitting one prisoner and cutting his ear, while another prisoner said someone fitting Civilian-17's description "raped a young detainee."
more:
http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/signal/iraq/sg082604.htm The referenced
Fay-Jones Report (pdf)
About the Report (Slate, 2004):
What's being investigated: Detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib prison.
Inquiry conducted by Army Major Gen. George Fay and Lieut. Gen. Anthony Jones.
What has been released: A 177-page report completed in August 2004.
Sources: Four additional Army investigations, including those by Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba and Lt. Gen. Paul Mikolashek, then the Army inspector general, as well as 170 interviews with military personnel.
Findings : Fifty-four military personnel and civilian contractors were in some way responsible for or complicit in the abuses at Abu Ghraib, including 27 from the 205th Military Intelligence Brigade who encouraged military police to abuse prisoners, abused prisoners themselves, or violated laws and rules of interrogation. Seven low-ranking soldiers were criminally prosecuted. The report attributes the abuse at Bagram to the failure of leaders of the 205th and the 800th Military Intelligence Brigades to supervise or properly discipline their soldiers. It cites a proliferation of interrogation guidelines, but blames the layers of guidelines only for relatively mild forms of mistreatment. The authors cite the commander Sanchez and his deputy Wojdakowskilater cleared by the Green investigationfor failing to ensure proper oversight and for issuing "inconsistent" and "confusing" guidelines.
Context: In contrast to the Green investigation, the Fay-Jones Report tracks the breakdown at Abu Ghraib to the top commanders. But no disciplinary action is recommended for Sanchez or his deputies.
http://www.slate.com/features/whatistorture/MilitaryReports.html