Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Samuel Alito's "reversal rate" revealed: 100%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AlexanderProgressive Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:17 PM
Original message
Samuel Alito's "reversal rate" revealed: 100%
Edited on Wed May-27-09 10:18 PM by AlexanderProgressive
Rachel Maddow's guest, Thomas Goldstein of SCOTUSblog, informed today that Sam Alito's "reversal rate," that is, the percentage of cases he handled that ended up in the Supreme Court and were overturned, was 100% (2 out of 2).

Goldstein uses this statistic to stress the fact that the statistic is useless, since most cases do not end up in the Supreme Court anyway, and those that do constitute a small number, too small to be statistically significant.
Sotomayor was accused by the Washington Times today of having a "high" reversal rate of 60%.

See video:

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200905270055
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Small sample size
I wouldn't read too much into that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlexanderProgressive Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I explained that
And I noted that Goldstein explained that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Then why bring it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. What even Goldstein didn't mention:
When the Supremes reverse (or affirm) lower court decisions, its the DECISION of the entire court. ONE of the judges on that court writes the decision for the court, and other members of the court may simply agree, may add their own comments, may write their own separate opinions, and may disagree. SO to say that the court reversed HER decisions (or alito's) is really not correct.

I'm going to write to Rachel about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC