Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who Drives Better: Drunks or Stoners? Scientists have built a high-tech simulator to lay this import

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:33 AM
Original message
Who Drives Better: Drunks or Stoners? Scientists have built a high-tech simulator to lay this import

By Jessica Portner Posted 05.27.2009 at 7:16 am 0 Comments


Anyone who has sped home after a night drinking at the bar, or gone out for a lazy ride after smoking marijuana, may already know intuitively what two Israeli professors have been driven to discover. Professors David Shinar and Adi Ronen at Ben Gurion University's Laboratory for Human Factors in Road Safety just opened a custom-built driving simulator this spring where they will conduct further research on pot-smoking drivers versus their inebriated counterparts. The gleaming bronze GM Cadillac simulator, which faces a wall of synchronized 160-degree screen images, immerses drivers in a personalized road trip like an IMAX movie, while researchers monitor their glance, expression, and heartbeat.

In a recent preliminary study, the professors enlisted 14 students -- all recreational marijuana users -- and tested them both when they were stoned and when they were soused. (Recruiting subjects for the marijuana and alcohol studies doesn't require much work. The lab doesn't even advertise, but as soon as word of the study got out, volunteers came rushing in.) The students were tested for physiological strain and driving performance as they drove through rural communities and desert scenes, and past roadblocks and pedestrians. One group smoked low and high doses of THC. Another downed vodka and "orange drink" cocktails to reach Israel's legal limit of .05 percent blood alcohol content. Others took a placebo.

None of the doped-up or drinking drivers were models of safety on the road. They tended to switch lane positions, swerve, and vary their steering. But the THC cigarette smokers drove significantly slower than the liquored-up subjects, who zoomed down the virtual lanes. The drinking drivers also tended to be confident and boast a sense of control, while the pot smokers seem to be "more aware of their impairment."

But that feeling can be a road hazard. "People who smoke marijuana think they can compensate for the drug's effect, but they can't," said Shinar, who founded the lab and is the chief scientist of Israel's National Road Safety Authority. "A detachment from reality is dangerous." More people die in traffic accidents than in wars, Shinar emphasized; he hopes this study will step up enforcement of dosed-up drivers.

<snip>

http://www.popsci.com/cars/article/2009-05/who-drives-better-drunks-or-stoners
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just what I was gonna say - Stoners, cuz they only go 10 miles an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Right, and they know they're bombed
Drunks are feeling great and will tell you they drive better when they're buzzed. Stoners just want to get there in one piece so they tend to avoid main roads and go v e r y s l o w l y.

Road rash from falling off my bicycle drunk at 13 convinced me that driving drunk was not going to be a good idea. I can now say I've never driven drunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Hey ...maybe that's why all these old fucks drive so slow in the fast lane ...they're doped up.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Hell yes. Metimucil and and Gold Bond really fucks you up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. The ones who drive best are the very wealthy ones.
They can afford to hire a sober chauffeur!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. More often, they just spend coin on meaner lawyers
I know of too many cases where the rich drunk driver got away with murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I never can understand these film stars and singers (I use the term loosely) who get bagged for
DUI/OUI and they make MILLIONS a year. Hire a damned chauffeur. Why do these assholes "need" to drive their own Escalade or other inappropriate vehicle around all by themselves?

Shit, get a mini van, put a little bed, fridge and a tv in the "wayback," hire a guy to drive you around, and have him park and chill out--nap, watch the tube, have a sandwich....and pay him well for his time and attention to detail. Surely a millionaire could afford to pay some poor bastard a decent wage for that kind of service, and even fund the guy's retirement. It wouldn't be that big a deal for the very rich. Instead, these "forty million a film" types get into accidents, arguments with cops, and end up having their mugshot become a "point 'n laugh" exercise.

In the Middle East, they reduce the lawyer impact and profits--you can, if you kill someone over there, negotiate with the family of the bereaved, and simply pay blood money and a fine, and walk away from the situation. The family has to agree, though--otherwise, you do jail time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Pot smokers seem to be "more aware of their impairment."
Dude...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. Dude? Where is time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. How can you have a "placebo" for pot and alcohol?
You can pretty much tell within a few seconds whether you're getting buzzed or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Some of us are such lightweight imbibers that mere suggestion gives a buzz
Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, I've driven into things under the influence of both... Back in the day, not lately.
Way back in the day.

Let's see. To use my "take it to the extreme" method of analysis:

Would I rather have everyone driving drunk, or everyone driving stoned?

I'll take everyone driving stoned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkaway Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. When you're stoned you stay home (or where ever you are)
and passively listen to music, play with your partner, watch TV or have nice long chats while sitting on the couch.

When you get drunk....well, the statistics speak for themselves.

The problem with the experiment is that the stoned group were required to drive when they would rather eat cake and laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I wish someone would tell that to my kid
who loves to smoke while driving. Happily, he hasn't had so much as a fender bender but it still bugs me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. there is a difference between being 'high' or being 'stoned' on pot


nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm pretty sure I've never driven over 35 mph while I was high.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. that's what cruise control is for..
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. You feel unsafe driving the speed limit.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Vodka and "orange drink" cocktails sound ghastly...
... and in Israel no less, where you'd think they could get actual orange juice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I guess they ran out of Vodka and Kool-aide. Klassy! OHHHH YEAHH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eauclaireliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. Stoners, of course
Drunks are absolutely convinced they can drive. Stoners would rather chill-out and sleep it off in the car while parked on the side of the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Threedifferentones Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. There is one other wrinkle this article does not seem to consider.
The strong effects of even a (smoked, not eaten) marijuana binge are gone in an hour or two, leaving one feeling a little odd, perhaps dazed and tired. No more impaired than someone who is exhausted from working 12 hours straight, probably even less because the person who is just plain exhausted will probably be in a hurry to get home. The same cannot be said for alcohol, the effects of which will last many hours after a binge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. Neither should be driving when under the influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
22. Both are extremely dangerous
but I think the odds of serious injury and death go way up if the accident involves a drunk driver rather than a stoner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
24. They need to test for other drugs
NyQuil, for 1 - also many prescription drugs in conjunction with low doses of alcahol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC