Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Credit Card Bill Allows Guns in National Parks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:29 PM
Original message
Credit Card Bill Allows Guns in National Parks
:wtf: The DINOS allowed the repukes to slip this f**$$!! NRA giveaway through. This ought to be just great :sarcasm: for the park ranger on his beat, trying to keep poachers away from threatened and endangered wildlife. :puke: FU, you fucking DINO repuke apologists. :grr: :banghead:

http://usgovinfo.about.com/b/2009/05/20/credit-card-bill-allows-guns-in-national-parks.htm

Credit Card Bill Allows Guns in National Parks
Wednesday May 20, 2009

Tucked away in the “Miscellaneous Provision” section at the end of the credit card reform bill – the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act of 2009 – just passed by the U.S. Congress, is a provision allowing people to carry loaded firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges.

Introduced as an amendment to the credit card reform bill by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma), the provision allows owners of licensed firearms to bring them into national parks and wildlife refuges as long as they are allowed to do so by state law. snip

“The Federal laws should make it clear that the second amendment rights of an individual at a unit of the National Park System or the National Wildlife Refuge System should not be infringed,” states Sen. Coburn’s amendment.

The Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act of 2009, along with Sen. Coburn’s “Protecting Americans from Violent Crimes” amendment, pass by votes of 279-147 in the House and 90-5 in the Senate.

Also See:
Concealed Guns to be Allowed in National Parks (2008)
Supreme Court Confirms Individual Gun Rights
D.C. v. Heller Leaves Big Second Amendment Question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dupe, but yup!
Brings national parks' regulation in line with the states in which they reside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. It would have been nice to have an interest rate cap and firearms in national parks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. yeah like poachers will abound now that legal carriers can carry
i always thought it was dumb that someone like myself who carries 24/7, every where i go, could get in the poop for carrying in the national park, was the dumbest rule ive ever seen. Especially when you consider the bad guys carry in the national parks all the time anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. cause guns are more important than the economy.
guns have made people :silly: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The CC bill was damn near perfect.
It addressed the three biggest issues...rate increases on existing balances, timely billing, and applying payments to the highest rate first.

How does adding some gun legislation make guns "more important than the economy"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Care to answer the question?
...or is this the limit of your "creativity"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. .
Edited on Fri May-22-09 08:34 PM by MercutioATC
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good. I support this.
Obama starts off in office with a good pro-gun record.

I WANT that NRA endorsement in 2012!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Credit card users have long been plagued by their inability to carry firearms
at national parks. It's good to see somebody finally stand up to the banks and pass this needed piece of credit card reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. LOL....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. brilliant
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ocracoker16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. dupe, but I agree with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't worry, Obama's going to take all of the guns. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Another BOR/2nd amendment victory!
:toast:

When are Brady bootlickers going to get a clue that their knuckle dragging days are over?

Sorry, Sarah (and Paul), maybe some other time... not!


Statement Of Brady President Paul Helmke
On House Of Representatives Action Today
For Immediate Release:
05-20-2009

Washington, DC - Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, issued the following statement:

“The U.S. House vote today to allow loaded firearms to be carried both concealed and openly in most of our national parks, in urban areas as well as rural areas, moves us one step closer to reversing the safety-oriented gun responsibility rule adopted early in the Reagan Administration.

“This vote ignored the concerns of law enforcement officials responsible for safety in our national parks as well as the vast majority of park users who submitted comments in opposition to changing these rules.

“By attaching this language to an unrelated bill designed to protect credit card users, those pushing more guns in more places have insulated themselves from any possible chance of a veto by President Obama.

“When he signs this bill, however, we call on President Obama to re-affirm his long-standing concern about more guns being carried in more places, and promise the American people that he will be taking steps in the near future to help reduce the gun violence in this country that unnecessarily touches so many each year.

“The Supreme Court has said that we have gun rights, but has also said those rights are ‘not unlimited.’ Let's now start talking about gun responsibilities as well as gun rights.”


:nopity:

http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/release.php?release=1138
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Let me see here, you imagine that legally carrying gun owners will suddenly turn poacher.
Do I have it about right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madryan Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-22-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nowhere can anyone show where gun laws have actually done anything
Seriously...

It's something of a logical fallacy to expect laws of any type to be heeded by people who fundamentally break laws ie criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC