|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
SeeHopeWin (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:00 PM Original message |
Should John Edwards be deployed to speak for single payer healthcare? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. um. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why should someone who doesn't believe in single-wife speak for single-payer? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric Condon (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
38. Yeah, because that's relevant here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 08:18 PM Response to Reply #38 |
56. John Edwards fucked us all and he fucked you, too. If he'd won the primary, we'd be TRULY fucked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric Condon (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 11:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. Look, knowing what we know now I'm glad Edwards didn't get the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeeHopeWin (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 10:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
58. Funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. No. John Edwards has destroyed his own credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Well said. It's too bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gblady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. totally agree.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cwydro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. Deleted message |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Clinton was President. Edwards is a one term Senator and two time loser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. NO. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. Sadly, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. NO! He is under investigation and his wife is promoting a tell-all book about his affair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
27. It wasn't exactly a tell-all book about his affair. I guess you didn't read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. She is a good writer, and I will no doubt read it someday n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demobrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
8. The man is the poster child for dishonesty and sleaze. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
9. Deleted message |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Not any more, he can't. He's damaged goods. Probably beyond repair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Yeah, he's through. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
34. Like maybe the OP has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Deleted message |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
11. John Edwards is toast. Anywhere he goes, the discussion will be about him, not issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
12. No. He is politically dead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
14. He'd just be a June bug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
16. Nope. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
17. No. He will do more harm than good for the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. no, and he doesn't support single payer anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
20. Not yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
21. Absolutely not. He is our party's Newt Gingrich. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
22. No n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
25. It's already a doomed idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
28. He needs to spend some time with his Family(ies) and stay out of the light for a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
29. DId he support single payer healthcare as a candidate? I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
30. "always"? Mitt Romney may have more of a track record on health care than Edwards. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. and Howard Dean most certainly does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
35. Yes, if you're the insurace companies and you want the debate to become all about some guy's dick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
36. I don't even think he was pro single payer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
37. We should take care to avoid sanctimony and sham... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
39. When did he support single payer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
40. No. We want to pass it, not kill it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
41. Yes. Health insurance industry has been attacking him for 2 solid years via the press. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:57 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. no they didn't. they scarcely bothered with Mr.CorporHedgeFund. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demwing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
42. NOPE. He's a distraction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
43. John Edwards needs to stay off the stage..for a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 08:18 PM Response to Reply #43 |
57. Only his DU supporters and a few media followers ever thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'll add my NO to this very long list of noes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HelenWheels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
45. Sorry, but No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
46. He could make it personal -- for example, when the average American husband sleeps around, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. bwah. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
48. I can only assume that this OP was made in jest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
50. I might be in favor of him being deployed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
51. No - he did not even run on single payer and he has LESS credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
52. no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
53. No, because then the topic becomes Edwards rather than health care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
54. NO, and you forgot the sarcasm tag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-16-09 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
55. You're kidding, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeeHopeWin (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #55 |
59. No, I wasn't kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 10:40 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. well,I think the main points are that he'd be weak spokesman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mudoria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
60. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
62. that's a plan that only republicans could love. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
63. LOL. Good one! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-17-09 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
64. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC