Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The real story behind the pet food recall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 09:35 AM
Original message
The real story behind the pet food recall
Read the whole story - this is shocking (and infuriating).

Nearly one month passed from the date Menu got its first report of a death to the date it issued the recall. During that time, no veterinarians were warned to be on the lookout for unusual numbers of kidney failure in their patients. No pet owners were warned to watch their pets for its symptoms. And thousands and thousands of pet owners kept buying those foods and giving them to their dogs and cats.

At that point, Menu had seen a 35 percent death rate in their test-lab cats, with another 45 percent suffering kidney damage. The overall death rate for animals in Menu's tests was around 20 percent. How many pets, eating those recalled foods, had died, become ill or suffered kidney damage in the time leading up to the recall and in the days since? The answer to that hasn't changed since the day the recall was issued: We don't know.

We at Pet Connection knew the 10-15 deaths being reported by the media did not reflect an accurate count. We wanted to get an idea of the real scope of the problem, so we started a database for people to report their dead or sick pets. On March 21, two days after opening the database, we had over 600 reported cases and more than 200 reported deaths. As of March 31, the number of deaths alone was at 2,797.

There are all kinds of problems with self-reported cases, and while we did correct for a couple of them, our numbers are not considered "confirmed." But USA Today reported on March 25 that data from Banfield, a nationwide chain of over 600 veterinary hospitals, "suggests is as high as hundreds a week during the three months the food was on the market."


http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2007/04/03/petscol.DTL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why can't somebody name the U.S. company
that outsourced our wheat production to China?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Because they're owned by huge Republican contributors. (It's ADM, btw.)
Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 10:59 AM by w4rma
And those contributors need time to dump their stocks onto unsuspecting non-insiders.

Found through the process of elimination and the fact that they own wheat gluten mills in Kansas:
Is Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) the distributor of the tainted wheat gluten?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x560863
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Yesterday, Lou Dobbs said it was a Las Vegas importer. See this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. The "enormous system failure"
like 9/11 was, to me includes a big sweep of corporate media and affected government interests who create a cloud of unknowing, a suppression of safeguards as a direct corollary, a general attitude to slide away from an urgency and clarity felt by the isolated community of those being woken up directly by reality.

I think of all the food dangers and alarms that have sounded and how we went from a daily scrutiny of individual foods and "potential" harm to total laissez faire until the bodies drop. I think, how like the war, when all the thinking and rationale is clouded, even by bold lies publicly surfacing, and then the 'story' settles on small bits of dramatic tragedy separate now from the perpetrators and the issues and the possibility of even stopping future disasters. It is a sideshow of the public mind, not the news, not a public service, and more and more a visceral propaganda machine protective of business interests even if they are in Red China. And investigations? Anyone beating on the door of the vets trying to amass a network picture of the calamity? Or wondering why the government is not doing the same since food chains for humans are not treated much better?

Another little magazine and community(perhaps even pet owners except most of them rely on the "news") has woken up to the stark horror of the MSM world and its favorite regime- the hard way where immediate tragedy overwhelms the mind realizing the bigger problem is the system.

And yes, the bigger story is how vulnerable this odd globalization has made the caveat emptor everyman andf how second rate except as bothersome victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. and yet the "media" is still using " about a dozen" whenever they report
the "additions of the day ":grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. yep
They're giving these extremely low numbers because there's no reporting structure in place - in the article, only one state has created a pet owner database in response to the poisoned food crisis. The lack of a reporting structure noted in the article was what really made me blow my stack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. They've cut the FDA inspections by half, so who's watching out for Mad Cow?
Psychologists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. No one. The Republican FDA uses their resources to *stop* tests for MadCow. (nt)
Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 10:53 AM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Mad cow disease just has a bad image.
It's been sent to Madison Ave for an overhaul:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Don't worry. Be happy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Real story: If it were kids no one would care.
If some company...let's say Halliburton...distributed tainted beef to America's high schools and lots of kids died, there'd be no outcry. But kill someone's pet? They'll be out in the streets with torches screaming for blood.

Having had to clean up after a lady who keeps around 40 cats in her house - her "rescue" operation is more like a place for cats to be entrapped until they die - I have had it up to here with animal lovers. They are not only brain-damaged, they are disconnected from the human race. They aren't even human any more.

If this incident has an up side, maybe it will make people think about how much they love their pets as opposed to loving their fellow man. And maybe looking up a copy of "Mondo Cane" (whose first part showed how people love dogs more than people) could be instructive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piesRsquare Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. The lady you cleaned up after
is not an animal lover; she's what is called a "hoarder". And hoarders provide exactly that: "a place to be entrapped until they die". Your observations and "diagnosis" are spot-on.

Hoarders have severe psychological problems and yes, are indeed rather disconnected from both reality and "the human race". If this woman is still around, please report her to law enforcement. Hoarding is a crime. She--and the cats she is hoarding--need immediate help; the cats need to be taken away from her.

However, hoarding is rare. Please do not paint all animal lovers and pet owners with the same brush.

I can understand your sentiments, as what you have witnessed is horrible. But most people with animals--even those with several animals--are not like this lady you speak of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's worth reading the entire article at link!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. Well this is what I thought when the toll went so high it looked like some cover up to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pigpickle Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-05-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
17. kick it up
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC