Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WAAS (07) Explains What Cheney Was Up To Besides Torture In Summer of 2002...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:31 PM
Original message
WAAS (07) Explains What Cheney Was Up To Besides Torture In Summer of 2002...
Edited on Thu May-14-09 10:48 PM by kpete
Don't miss really important NYT oped today by former CIA CTC deputy general counsel Vicki Divoll (that amplifies a point Marcy Wheeler has been making for weeks):
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/13/opinion/13divoll.html?ref=global

There is no legally recognized entity under National Security Act as "gang of four."

The whole highly restrictive parameters under which Pelosi was briefed in 2002 (and she says was actively misled in that same single briefing) may be illegal.
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/14/pelosi-cia-told-us-waterboarding-was-not-being-employed/

There is also highly interesting reporting by Murray Waas http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0215nj1.htm from a couple years ago that explains the backdrop to those restricted briefings and you won't be surprised to know it all goes back to Cheney. The upshot: that in the summer of 2002 Cheney was using leaks to threaten to stop notifying Congressional intel committes about covert programs and sensitive information. His reason was that he said Congress leaks (and he meant, Congressional Democrats). But turned out the leaker the FBI identified on intel in question Cheney was fuming about at the time was not a Democrat but a Republican, then ranking R on Senate Intel committee Richard Shelby.

So - June 2002, Cheney looking for reason not to brief Congress. August 2002 - Zubaydah waterboarded 83 times. September 2002 - Pelosi and Goss briefed retractively on methods the CIA determined were "legal" to use in covert enhanced interrogation program. And according to Pelosi, she was not told that Zubaydah had already been waterboarded. Indeed, she says she was told waterboarding was not BEING used (, if technically accurate, highly misleading since it had been used 83 times on Zubaydah the past month).

http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0215nj1.htm
http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/009233.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ControlledDemolition Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. This shows that Cheney was so desperate for false testimony linking Saddam to 911. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. So did Shelby "leak" to allow Cheney to limit the number of congress people he
had to brief? He was never charged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-15-09 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Question: Did bu$h misuse his authority w signing statements to disregard the NSA of '47?
Was it his own authority that allowed him to break the law about informing congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC