Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Whitehouse releases 2 previously classified "anti-torture" memos authored by Bush officials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:46 PM
Original message
Senator Whitehouse releases 2 previously classified "anti-torture" memos authored by Bush officials

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2009/05/highlights-bush-administrations-anti-torture-memos

A Senate judiciary subcommittee released copies of two unclassified 2005 Bush administration anti-torture memos at a hearing on Wednesday. A third anti-torture memo, written by Philip Zelikow, a former aide to then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, is in the process of being declassified. Last week, Zelikow told Mother Jones that he suspected Vice President Dick Cheney was behind an effort to "collect and destroy" all copies of that memo. Zelikow also disclosed the existence of additional anti-torture memos last week, and the Senate Judiciary subcommittee, led by Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) was able to obtain them for Wednesday's hearing.

...

The first unclassified memo, distributed in June 2005, was a joint paper drafted by Zelikow,the state department legal adviser, John Bellinger, and Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England, who each harbored concerned about the White House's treatment of terrorism suspects. In the joint paper, the torture opponents argued that "while balancing the danger these individuals may present, they must be treated humanely, consistent with our values and the values of the free world." They also suggested that the President appoint a special board with the power to review detainee treatment and make recommendations. In the interim, Zelikow and the others suggested the US adopt the provisions of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions as a basis for detainee treatment. They emphasize (in ALL CAPS):

WE ARE NOT SAYING THAT THESE DETAINEES ARE NECESSARlLY ENTITLED TO THIS STATUS. TO BE CLEAR: WE ARE GIVING THEM A TEMPORARY STATUS THEY DO NOT DESERVE. BUT WE ARE NOT DOING THIS FOR THEM. WE ARE DOING IT FOR US.

The dissidents also suggested the closure of the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and the transfer of detainees to US facilities (a position congressional Republicans now strenuously oppose):

As part of this interim system, and as the number of detainees goes down, the U.S. will no longer need to maintain a detention facility in Guantanamo. That facility will close and we expect to transfer remaining detainees to a facility in the United States.

They call for transparency:

If the U.S. acts as if it has something to hide, Americans and the world will assume it does. A durable system for handling captured terrorist suspects will be conducted in a manner that can withstand outside scrutiny. Further, the mystery can be dispelled in a way that builds understanding for the system, and for the dilemmas each country must face if it joins in fighting these violent, transnational organizations.

And they offer a prophetic warning:

As these individuals are brought to trial, aspects of their detention and interrogation will come to light. This is a fact. It must be faced. Better to face it now, and by this administration.

The Bush administration disregarded their advice. Donald Rumsfeld, then the Secretary of Defense, disavowed the joint paper and stripped England of responsibility for detainee affairs. But the very next month, Zelikow and Bellinger produced another memo . This time, they argued more vehemently for a "stronger legal framework" for detainee treatment:

We do not adopt legal standards in our behavior as a favor to terrorists. We do it for ourselves, and to be able to exemplify the values that distinguish us from the terrorists.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. "If the U.S. acts as if it has something to hide, Americans and the rest of the
Edited on Thu May-14-09 01:53 PM by Hissyspit
world will assume it does."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good. Rec'd. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. "We are not doing this for them. We are doing it for US." Exactly, right on, bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC