Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Caves to Banks: 21 Dems Join GOP to Kill Credit Card Rate Limit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:52 PM
Original message
Senate Caves to Banks: 21 Dems Join GOP to Kill Credit Card Rate Limit
Democrats Bought & Sold - Owned by the Banks. Treasonous bastards.

http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/13/senate-caves-to-banks-21-dems-join-gop-to-kill-credit-card-rate-limit/

Last Wednesday, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the majority whip and the chairman of the Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government, said this:

DURBIN: And the banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.

Flash forward to today:



Here’s a list of the Democrats:

* Akaka (D-HI)
* Baucus (D-MT)
* Bayh (D-IN)
* Bennet (D-CO), Yea
* Bingaman (D-NM)
* Byrd (D-WV)
* Cantwell (D-WA)
* Carper (D-DE)
* Hagan (D-NC)
* Johnson (D-SD)
* Kaufman (D-DE)
* Landrieu (D-LA)
* Lieberman (ID-CT)
* Lincoln (D-AR)
* Murray (D-WA)
* Nelson (D-FL)
* Nelson (D-NE)
* Pryor (D-AR)
* Shaheen (D-NH)
* Specter (D-PA)
* Stabenow (D-MI)
* Tester (D-MT)
* Warner (D-VA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. ain't that some shit?...the lobbyist truly run this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And who runs the Lobbyists?
Somewhere's a thread about GOP being the dirtiest of appellations.
No. I'd say "Quisling" is right up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Rich people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
77. if they are your rep, write a letter telling the people of your state
that they supported usury, a mortal sin and that they have made it personal to keep them in debt slavery. write every paper you have, call into every station in the state. get them OUT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. And those would have been Republicans a generation ago
ain't it great?

WHY they need to be voted out in primaries

Of course I think they will get it when the pitchforks, the tar and the feathers come out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I doubt there will be any pitchforks, tar or feathers.
Far too many people are complacent, and willing to settle for "hope" instead of progress.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. When people are hungry enough
that is when they come.

but that may take some time still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. When people are hungry enough
the government will turn the militarized police and the national guard on us. Pitchforks won't be of much use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Then why bother, if that is your view
by the way, they did turn the national guard and the army last time around, we still got Social Security


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I'm not saying that we shouldn't bother.
I'm just saying to expect our own government to criminalize us, cause a whole lot of bloodshed and death, and then blame us for it.

Yes, they did it last time and we still got Social Security. Now, almost every police force has become paramilitary and they don't even pretend to serve and protect anymore. There is an open culture of "us verses them" in most places whenever citizens try to use our first amendment rights.

If people ever get to the point of marching on Washington it's going to be far, far worse that even back in the days when Pinkertons opened fire with impunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. The technology changes but not the attitudes
and that is the point

And yes I expect the empire to do what the empire will do, that includes turning on its citizens, but I hate the attitude of just mentioning the obvious, oh well... I guess it's them dusty tomes.

By the way, you think the cops who used them billy clubs on union organizers were not militarized? They were... police have been paramilitary forces since the turn of the last century... it is just that their training is better these days...


But us vs them... hasn't changed one iota since humans were forced to face other humans to get the most basic of things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Okay, I guess you are insisting on knowing better than me
and belittling anything I say just because you think you're so much smarter than me. Good for you. :eyes:

Good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. No just pointing that police forces have been paramilitary for a while
If that is belittling so be it


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
67. Jeeze, we just got rid of Liddy Dole for Kay Hagan (D) you'd think
she'd have understood what we want her to vote for by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. The wealth distribution continues
Dollars being sucked from middle class Americans to the millionaires and billionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yep. Public financing of campaigns would go a long way to change this
system. There is just too much money slushing around the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Much more clean up needs to be done...the Blue Doga gatta go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. you can't unseat an incumbent Democrat. The party will back them all the way.
So will big money. Of course you could vote republiCon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Perhaps....the People Hunger for the Truth shall be a factor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #44
63. Not sure what that is. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Whatever thats not false
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. Assuming there is an ulitmate truth or reality, people seek different levels.
The general was right when he said we can't handle the truth. I am sure that there are levels of truth that all of us can't handle. The 20% that still support bush will not accept a level of truth beyond what they currently already believe. Don't assume everyone is seeking more truth than they already know and can accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. I was not assuming all peeps yearn for the truth...nevertheless, if enough TRUTH emerges
the GOP will look like Crap....for they are the ones guilty of twisting facts to suit their selfish ends...the TRUTH will dispel their stories of blaming others...

Bullies are known to blame others for their own misdeeds....my bully acquaintances do this all the time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, shit...this has been a day of disappointments
first the president, now the senate. I'm almost afraid to think about tomorrow. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. The banks kill the econonmy, and still have a legal right to charge
usurious rates, to raise their rates just because they want to, and to charge predatory hidden charges and fees all with the blessings of our politicians.

That's totally fucked up. :grr:

It would be nice if our government represented US instead of them. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Amd thsi under a President who promised us
CHANGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. After Obama is done shoveling trillions of dollars into the banks
all that will be left for the programs that serve the rest of us will be spare change.

Perhaps that's what he meant all along, and people were just misunderstanding him. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
49. Did Obama have a vote? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
66. No the guy had something far more important than a vote -
Edited on Thu May-14-09 01:21 PM by truedelphi
As President, he made the appointments.

So basically he took the same Bernie Madoff types that had destroyed the banking regulations that were known for DECADES to keep us safe, and who destroyed foreign economies (Look up Geithner's record on the Asian economic mess of the late nineties - it is pretty atrocious) and gave them the top seats above the Food Chain. That is why Bernanke heads the Fed and Geithner heads up Treasury.
And between the two of them, they hand out almost all the BailOut monies -so there is some real power there.

He's been in office for over 100 days. By this juncture, had Obama driven by conscience, he could have stipulated to his appointees, you wanna keep your job, then you see to it that the Banking Reform act of 1999 is done in. You guys see to it that NO BANK have in place credit card policies that are so disgustingly usurious. "Wanna keep your jobs, Ben and Tim, you explain to your Wall Street buddies that they better scrap the injury they are doing to the middle class. And start getting rid of the Banking Reform Act of 1999." (That Banking Act is how we have arrived at the place where 24.9 % and higher interest rates are just business as normal. In my father's day, the laws on the books prevented this from happening.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. While I agree completely...
.. that our congress is bought and sold, there is one thing that bothers me.

A 15% cap would be STUPID. Any rate cap would normally be anchored to the prime rate, the 10 year treasury rate, or SOMETHING to allow for the possibility (likelihood with the stupid way the economy is being handled)
of generally higher rates.

I would think someone like Bernie Sanders would be smarter than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. Bernie Sanders isn't stupid. Why does the cap have to be tied to anything?
It isn't for credit unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #39
52. Because if the prime rate..
.... is 15%, the CC rate cannot be. Looks like you are not to bright either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
74. It isn't necessary to resort to insults. I will admit that I do not understand something.
But when you resort to insults you destroy your creditability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
78. 15% is not stupid. Credit unions already adhere to this rate cap. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
80. The law provides a mechanism to update this rate if necessary. Sanders is not an idiot and
Edited on Thu May-14-09 05:48 PM by Mass
understands how the system works.

This is the bill


SA 1062. Mr. SANDERS (for himself, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. LEVIN) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1058 proposed by Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. SHELBY) to the bill H.R. 627, to amend the Truth in Lending Act to establish fair and transparent practices relating to the extension of credit under an open end consumer credit plan, and for other purposes; as follows:

At the appropriate place, insert the following:

SEC. __. NATIONAL CONSUMER CREDIT USURY RATE.

(a) In General.--Section 107 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1606) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

``(f) National Consumer Credit Usury Rate.--

``(1) LIMITATION ESTABLISHED.--Notwithstanding subsection (a) or any other provision of law, but except as provided in paragraph (2), the annual percentage rate applicable to an extension of credit obtained by use of a credit card may not exceed 15 percent on unpaid balances, inclusive of all finance charges. Any fees that are not considered finance charges under section 106(a) may not be used to evade the limitations of this paragraph, and the total sum of such fees may not exceed the total amount of finance charges assessed.

GPO's PDF

``(2) EXCEPTIONS.--

``(A) BOARD AUTHORITY.--The Board may establish, after consultation with the appropriate committees of Congress, the Secretary of the Treasury, and any other interested Federal financial institution regulatory agency, an annual percentage rate of interest ceiling exceeding the 15 percent annual rate under paragraph (1) for periods of not to exceed 18 months, upon a determination that--

``(i) money market interest rates have risen over the preceding 6-month period; or

``(ii) prevailing interest rate levels threaten the safety and soundness of individual lenders, as evidenced by adverse trends in liquidity, capital, earnings, and growth.

``(B) TREATMENT OF CREDIT UNIONS.--The limitation in paragraph (1) does not apply with respect to any extension of credit by an insured credit union, as that term is defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752).

``(3) PENALTIES FOR CHARGING HIGHER RATES.--

``(A) VIOLATION.--The taking, receiving, reserving, or charging of an annual percentage rate or fee greater than that permitted by paragraph (1), when knowingly done, shall be deemed a violation of this title, and a forfeiture of the entire interest which the note, bill, or other evidence of the obligation carries with it, or which has been agreed to be paid thereon.

``(B) REFUND OF INTEREST AMOUNTS.--If an annual percentage rate or fee greater than that permitted under paragraph (1) has been paid, the person by whom it has been paid, or the legal representative thereof, may, by bringing an action not later than 2 years after the date on which the usurious collection was last made, recover back from the lender in an action in the nature of an action of debt, the entire amount of interest, finance charges, or fees paid.

``(4) CIVIL LIABILITY.--Any creditor who violates this subsection shall be subject to the provisions of section 130.''.

(b) Civil Liability Conforming Amendment.--Section 130(a) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1640(a)) is amended by inserting ``section 107(f)'' before ``this chapter''.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Corporate Sell Outs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. I fucking hate Cantwell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
75. I called her office and got some kind of tap dance that I didn't understand.
Wish someone smarter than me (which is a rather large pool) would call and then explain to me. They said she vote against a procedure or some thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hagan is a HUGE disappointment - not that Dole was a viable choice here in NC but still
I want a REAL choice - not republican-lite! Argh! :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I guess Hagen wasn't paying too much attention on how and why she got elected huh? nt
Edited on Wed May-13-09 09:30 PM by nc4bo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #23
58. I just called her office to let her know her getting re-elected is NOT a sure thing
And that allying herself with fuckwads like Bill Nelson and Mary Landrau is NOT the way to go. Left a message and some guy who works for her named Ube is supposed to call me back. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. None of those names surprises me.
They seem to be the same names that continually show up as being more supportive of corporations and republican policies than of Democratic ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh dear - not Kay Hagen. We just elected her behind! WTF?!
Time to burn up her phone.

Ack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Yeah she's getting a call from me tomorrow!
She's got some REAL explaining to do. If not - I'm currently unemployeeed and might just camp outside her office for awhile with some not so nice protest signs. Seriously - wtf - is she a republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
53. looks like you guys got punked! It's okay, in FL we got punked by Nelson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #53
59. Yep - well the other choice was Elizabeth Dole
What the hell kind of choice is that? But yeah, I called her. Left a voice-mail that her gettin re-elected here in NC in NOT a sure thing at all and that we ARE paying attention. I said she had better start standing up for the people who voted for her or she will find herself without any supporters. So some guy who works for her named Ube is supposed to call me back and say why she voted no. I'm guessing he won't cause there is no good reason. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. Akaka caved and not Inouye?
Now there's a "Man Bites Dog" story for you! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. A pox on their houses.
The short list of all the (D)s who need to be defeated (by a progressive (D), of course) next cycle.

If they had any concept of the damage this will engender - if they even cared - they would not have voted against their constituents this way.

I hope all their dicks fall off. Debbie's too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. Murray and Cantwell?
That's a surprise.

Unlike the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Murray is a great disappointment. Cantwell not so surprising. She supported the bush war and DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
68. Murray voted to protect Millionaires too
Only one of 10 Democratic Senators who voted for Millionaires.

http://www.politicususa.com/en/10-Dems-Protect-Millionaires

The Seattle Times owners, the blood money Blethen boys give out their 'political' endorsements to whomever supports repeal of the estate tax.


Cantwell, expected. Murray, despicable sell out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #68
81. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm regretting my vote for
Warner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. I liked Jon Tester better as a candidate than I do as a Senator. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our second quarter 2009 fund drive.
Donate and you'll be automatically entered into our daily contest.
New prizes daily!



No purchase or donation necessary. Void where prohibited. Click here for more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. Why don't you vote to re-instate DEBTORS PRISONS, you sons of bitches?????
Edited on Wed May-13-09 10:15 PM by Faryn Balyncd

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. scum.
I'm done with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DatManFromNawlins Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
36. Time for a 10 million man march
on Washington. Shut the fuckers down. They give our money away so that big business can balance their books but won't help Americans under the crushing weight of debt that has been forced upon them to simply survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
37. It don't surprise me about Lincoln & Pryor (D-AR's), they vote with the repukes most of the time.
Arkansas needs to do some house cleaning, and get rid of these DINO'S!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
41. Fuck I didn't realize that my senators were corporate dems.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
42. So what was all the bullshit about the 60 Democrats in the Senate?
We can't even get 51 to vote Democratic. It isn't Democrat vs. republiCon, it's corporatists vs. the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #42
65. When it's Wall Street vs. the American citizen, we have 33 Democrats in the Senate.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #65
72. I agree and don't see a solution. I think the other 27 have too much corp backing to dislodge.
By the way your "nt" belongs in the subject line. The point is to prevent someone opening your message to see if there is more text. If you put it in the message, it defeats the purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #42
71. Empty propaganda to help sell the illusion to America that 'things will be better'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
43. Both Nelsons have got to go
Complete corporate whores. Both of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
45. Hey Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell,
I'll be calling both your offices in the morning.

I'd expect this from you, Maria Cantwell -- most of the time you don't seem to realize you're a Democrat, supposedly -- but Patty Murray? You've got to be kidding. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Cantwell is a DLC puke, but Murray's vote surprises me
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
82. Exactly. One thing we are learning is that the Democrats in the Senate at least
had an easy ride for the bush years. They could pretend they were upset at what was happening but never really put up a fight. But now they have a majority, they have to show their true colors. There are only about 33 Senators that support the American people.

I would love to fix the Democratic Party, but it is an uphill fight against the corporate money. May be easier to withdraw and start a new party. Leave Specter and leave the party to the republiCon lites (DLC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
47. Ha! All hail the Uniparty!!!!
Uniparty is Supreme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
48. both murray *and* cantwell. usually they trade off the controversial votes.
you can thank washington state for 9.5% of this particular rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter1x9 Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
50. Best government that money can buy.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
51. People say they have to vote with their constituents. Bull hockey.
How many of their constituents want to pay 30% or more credit card rates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
54. and now you're givin' me, givin' me....nothin' but DLC, DLC!
Democratic "change" we can believe in!

The DLC ruins it again.....this is what we get for being "loyal Democrats"...PUNKED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
55. Nothing short of a revolution will save this country from these 2 self-serving parties!
And you really believe that we're going to see ANY improvement in the health care system?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
56. Tell me again what the difference was between Bill Nelson and Katherine Harris?
They're both fundie, right-wing shitheads!!

At least Harris offered some entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
57. My new senator, Shaheen, is on the list. She's half a Republican
and it really pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
60. I am really disappointed with Tester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
61. No surprise my Senators (Carper, Kaufman) caved...
we all know about Delaware and credit cards. I will contact their offices again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
62. Evan Bayh will never get another vote from me
hear me GOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
69. What jerks
They are so out of touch with reality. At least my legitimate senator, Dodd, didn't betray me. The whole system is going to collapse anyway, so who cares what these unprincipled people think. And I think we should kick Specter back to the Republics. He has the moral compass of an intrusive weed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
73. Bought and paid for by the Banking industry, SICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
79. Specter isn't a Dem, he's a turncoat ass. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC