Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservatives Set To Block Dawn Johnsen’s Nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:46 AM
Original message
Conservatives Set To Block Dawn Johnsen’s Nomination
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/13/conservatives-block-johnsen/

Conservatives Set To Block Dawn Johnsen’s Nomination


Roll Call reports that conservatives look poised to successfully block the nomination of Dawn Johnsen to head the White House Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) declared that his hands were tied without the assistance of a few Republican votes:

“Right now we’re finding out when to do that,” Reid said, responding to a question about the status of Indiana University law professor Dawn Johnsen’s nomination to the Justice post. “We need a couple Republican votes until we can get to 60.”


It’s unclear why 60 votes are needed to confirm Johnsen, considering her predecessor, Jay Bybee — who went on to authorize illegal torture — won easy confirmation in 2001 through a simple voice vote. Bybee’s successor, Jack Goldsmith, was also approved by a voice vote. Steven Bradbury served for three years as an acting OLC head, and so did not have to come up for a vote. Having a full — and filibuster-proof — Senate vote on Johnsen would be an unusual break with recent precedent.

Senators opposing Johnsen include new Democrat Arlen Specter (PA), who announced his opposition to Johnsen on the day he decided to switch parties, though he has yet to explain why he opposes her. Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) has said he “is concerned about her outspoken pro-choice views on abortion.” Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) insists that Johnsen “has not demonstrated the seriousness and necessary resolve to address the national security challenges we face.”

Johnsen is eminently qualified to head the OLC. She has been an outspoken critic of Bush’s torture and eavesdropping programs, argues persuasively for accountability for wrongdoing, and has written passionately in support of checks and balances and against executive branch power grabs. She is a strong progressive candidate who could restore the tainted OLC to a place of legal professionalism and pride. And, like the majority of Americans, Johnsen thinks abortions should be safe and legal in most cases.

Specter and Nelson can find little in Johnsen’s sterling record to substantively critique, and Reid shouldn’t let them stand in the way.
Indeed, their opposition to her breaks their track record for supporting previous OLC heads like Bybee. Remember, when Bush nominated Bybee for a federal judgeship, Specter, Nelson, Cornyn, and Reid all voted to confirm him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. she's to be one of the jewels in the crown
Dawn is one of the best persons nominated so far by this administration, imo. I hope someone up there is prepared to fight for her like they have for many of the more conservative (and controversial) appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree totally. This is very annoying. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obama can always appoint her during a recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. ^
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Damn it to hell people
Folks here will bitch that Obama isn't doing anything about the DOJ yet they could care less that his nominees are being blocked.

If the people he nominated for key posts are not confirmed, how is he supposed to get the DOJ back into shape?

In addition to Dawn Johnson the nominations of the below DOJ division heads have been stalled by the right - look at the posts and tell me why you think the confirmations have yet to happen.

David Kris, National Security Division
Tony West, Civil Division
Tony West, Civil Division
Christine Varney, Antitrust Division
Ronald H. Weich, Office of Legislative Affairs

Do something about this, try to make the difference you insist needs to happen. Sign the petition that demands that Obama's nominees be confirmed.
https://secure.pfaw.org/site/SPageServer?pagename=rjc_doj_nominees&autologin=true&JServSessionIdr010=ag7l2o64i1.app303b

If he can't get these folks confirmed imagine what troubles are out there for each of the US Attorney hired by this admin and for the SCOTUS nominee.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Don't you like how folks miss the important threads
and get lost in nonsense they don't understand?

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC