Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do you have a right to public education but not public healthcare?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:23 AM
Original message
Why do you have a right to public education but not public healthcare?
How can you not have one without the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Public education is required to make democracy work; an informed electorate is essential.
Insurance for health care was developed in the 20th century. It's a damn shame that
the system of health care in Britain that was developed after WW II wasn't also developed
in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. So is a healthy one....
They have us from both ends....

Market the junk food/unhealthy lifestyle to make people sick, then milk them on the health care side with outrageous profits and claim denial.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. That may have been true once, but now our elected representatives—
Edited on Wed May-13-09 08:54 AM by salguine
at the national level, at least—don't see an informed electorate as a particularly desirable thing. Trust me, having an electorate that doesn't know anything works to their advantage come election time, and in their eyes, that trumps the damage done to our democracy by having a stupid citizenry. It's the same reason that they don't mind in the least that most people don't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The US has gradually been moving toward oligarchy, which is why
the powers that be aren't interested in having an educated electorate. The concept of democracy
requires an informed electorate. Our reality is quite different.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. "Gradually?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. as much as education is underfunded, seems to me like they don't want that either n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. favorite scene in Sicko is the montage of US schools, post office, etc., with Soviet prop film
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do you have a right to public education?
Edited on Wed May-13-09 08:36 AM by slackmaster
All states require that kids get educated up to a certain level, and provide schools supported by taxpayer money. But I don't see anything in the federal Constituation about a right to an education at public expense.

I don't believe any state provides blanket free education past high school, which IMO is the bare minimum a person needs to survive but not sufficient for most people to prosper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes, you have a right.
Edited on Wed May-13-09 08:45 AM by Postman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. It doesn't say what level you have a right to be provided with at public expense
And as noted in the Wiki article there is controversy over compulsory schooling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. The standard argument is grounded in the Preamble to the Constitution.
"promote the general welfare" is the rubric there.

I guess it would be a good enough Constitutional basis...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fountain79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's a dangerous precedent to take....
If the constitutionality of an action is based on, "To promote the general welfare" then that leaves quite a bit open in terms of what is in the public's best interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, it's one that has been used over the years by public education activists.
It IS kinda broad to be basing an entire policy on. But there it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fountain79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Public Education is a state issue...
It should not be a national issue really...when you get the national government involved with state and local education you get "No Child Left Behind"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. That was one bad policy...
... but without some federal guidelines, there are states that would decide that anything beyond eighth grade should not be funded at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Public education relieves corporations from the need to train people
In other words, public education saves corporations money. And really, private colleges and universities are playing in the same game.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why do we have anything public?
public roads? Why should I pay taxes to fix YOUR roads?

firefighters? Why should I pay for someone to put YOUR fire out?

lighthouses? Why should I pay for someone to warn YOU about the rocks?

"...the government should provide public goods — goods that are nonrival (they benefit everyone) and nonexcludable (there’s no way to restrict the benefits to people who pay.)"
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/what-should-government-do-a-jindal-meditation/

nonrival and nonexcludable. National defense. Lighthouses. Education. Health Care.

Do we educate people even if they can't pay anything? Of course. Does it benefit everyone? Obviously.

Should we heal the sick even if they can't pay anything? Of course. Does it benefit everyone? Obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. From establishment POV, indoctrination is required - but healthcare? You're on your own
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. Education is somewhat necessary for a workforce,
but who cares what happens when you drop?

There's always another one coming up to take your place.

Bic employees we call 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
20. The republicans have been trying to destroy public Ed too
and they don't want anyone to get anything else "handed" to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. And ...
why do you have a right to single-payer police and fire protection w/o having to buy insurance and have deductibles and co-pays? Why do we have single-payer roads? :think:

Questions on single-payer healthcare? Find info here.

Today's death toll due to lack of healthcare: 273 people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
22. Oh don't worry, public education is next on the chopping block.
Freedom is on the march! WHEEEEE It's like riding a roller coaster with no brakes. Or rails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC