Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Move OVER, Rick Man-On-Dog Santorum...Bill O'Reilly's got a little thing for TURTLES. And falafels.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 03:17 PM
Original message
Move OVER, Rick Man-On-Dog Santorum...Bill O'Reilly's got a little thing for TURTLES. And falafels.
Edited on Tue May-12-09 03:18 PM by Amerigo Vespucci
Video @ the URL below.

Bill O'Reilly's theory on gay marriage: Next we'll be marrying turtles!
By David Neiwert Tuesday May 12, 2009 11:30am

http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/bill-oreillys-theory-gay-marriage-ne

Ewwwwwwwww. Does anyone really want to listen to Bill O'Reilly's speculations on sex acts?

When he opened up his segment on The O'Reilly Factor last night talking about the future possibilities for marriage created by the innovation of gay marriage, the first thing he mentioned was threesomes -- while chatting with two toothsome members of The Factor Harem:

O'Reilly: All right, Hoover. I did not know this, but I had said from the jump if you OK gay marriage, then you have to do plural marriage, which is now -- has a name, triads. Three people getting married. There is a group in Maui, Hawaii, called the Lessin's adversary group -- advocacy group, and it's World Polygamy Association. They're associated with that. And they want to be married.

So, No. 1, I'm an oracle. And No. 2, how you can deny them under equal protection under the law?

Hoover: You can't deny them under equal protection of the law.

O'Reilly: OK, so you say that they have to marry, as well.

Hoover: No, no. Here's what I think. First of all, I think it is extremely disingenuous for you to suggest that, if you allow gay people to get married, they're going to have to allow -- that polygamy is then going to run --

O'Reilly: You just said you have to.

Hoover: -- rampant across the United States. Here's --

O'Reilly: You just -- wait, wait. You just said you have to allow them.

Hoover: Before the camera went on you said to me two things: due process.

O'Reilly: Right.

Hoover: You know what due process is? Due process is when we have laws, we then enforce them. We don't even -- we barely in five states have laws that gay people can be married. We have states -- laws in zero states that polygamy can happen.

O'Reilly: If I walk in to the Massachusetts state house and say, "Hey, Governor Deval Patrick, you've got to marry me and Lenny." All right? Because --

Hoover: I would love to see that, by the way.

O'Reilly: Not only Lenny, but Squiggy too. All right? Or I walk in with the O'Brien twins from South Boston and say, "Hey, you've got to marry me, because you're allowing gays to get married, and I'm in the Lessin's group, the World Polygamy Association."

All this fantasizing made us immediately want to go take a shower with a falafel or something.

But even worse, once we realized that he was describing his own threesome fantasies when it came to sex acts made possible by gay marriage, it really got disgusting when he went even further down that road: http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/bill-oreillys-theory-gay-marriage-ne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. O'Reilly thinks he's an oracle?
More like an orifice, dingleberries and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC