WAPO A01: How Bogus Letter Became a Case for War

[BuyingThyme]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/02/AR2007040201777.html

[acmavm]

1. Nice. Complete exonerates the people who profited most from the

'fraud'.

[BuyingThyme]

2. It seems that the Post only exists to provide cover for Cheney,

Libby, Wolfowitz, Perle, etc.

It makes me wonder why they put this thing on the front page. Something must be coming down the pike.

[magellan]

3. Still excusing the Bush** cabal, from what little I read

Sorry, I just can't stomach more lies to cover lies at this point. The truth has been out there for some time and it's quite simple and straightforward and backed by people who were there at the time.

But the most damning thing is this: no Bush** defender has yet adequately explained what the CIA's motivation for involving us unnecessarily in a war would be, whereas BushCo had all the motivation in the world and is still clinging to the same sorry excuses like a leaky life-raft.

[peacetalksforall]

4. The war is PNAC driven. The FBI and CIA work for Republicans

through each administratiion, even while Dems are in the WH. If I were PNAC, I would assume that the FBI and CIA would be there just like they have been since Hoover, war or no war. CIA - workhorse for corporations.