Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran urges world action on Israeli nukes--(They say turnabout is fair play.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:36 PM
Original message
Iran urges world action on Israeli nukes--(They say turnabout is fair play.)
Iran urges world action on Israeli nukes

Iran says Israel's undeclared arsenal of approximately 200 atomic warheads is the only obstacle in the way of a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East.

In a Monday address to the third session of the preparatory committee for the 2010 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference in New York, Iranian delegates hit out at the lack of world action on Israel's possession of atomic nuclear weapons -- which can be launched from land, sea and air.

According to the delegates, the Israeli military's indiscriminate and deliberate use of white phosphorus shells against Palestinian civilians shows that “Tel Aviv is not fit to possess nuclear weapons”.

“Israel's nuclear arsenal represents the single greatest threat to countries in the region,” said the delegates, while criticizing the West's hands-off approach to Tel Aviv's development of nuclear weaponry.

“Washington echelons and their European counterparts actually helped equip Israel with nuclear weaponry, in complete violation of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty,” the delegation asserted.

Israel is widely regarded as the sixth-largest nuclear power in the world and the sole possessor of an atomic arsenal in the Middle East. It reportedly houses at least 100 bunker-busting bombs, which come in the form of laser-guided mini-nukes with the ability of penetrating underground targets.

<more>

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=94328§ionid=351020101

*

They say turnabout is fair play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes indeed turnabout is fair play...I could never understand how
countries that have them tell other they can't...Cheney and his cabal was dying to use them...I guess because he is about to die he wants to take the world with him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Feel that way about guns myself
Why would a government tell me they can own guns and we can't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
Fair play, indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Israel should be Nuke free
I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ouch
Fair enough point, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree - Tel Aviv is not fit to possess nuclear weapons. n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. It's because of attitudes like yours that they very badly need nukes.
Edited on Mon May-11-09 07:27 PM by Jim Sagle
And BTW, they're keeping them. Ain't nobody going to turn them around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. By your logic, each Palestinian should have a personal nuke as well.
If there was ever anyone in more dire need.... There's a reason it's called "NON-PROLIFERATION".

It's a good thing hypocrisy, by itself, doesn't kill or maim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. No one has threatened to drive the Palestinians into the sea.
So the hyprocrisy is all yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. What's really amazing...
Edited on Tue May-12-09 01:24 PM by Chulanowa
In American politics, we loathe the soundbite, the meme, the spin. We see a commercial from one politician or the other, and we tear it apart at the seams and laugh at the quivering bits, then fill in the gaps with all the things left out of the commercial to educate our companions. We don't regard the ten-second blurb as much more than a target.

HOWEVER...

Once we leave American politics, and start looking at international politics, these same memes, soundbites, slogans, and spin become the absolute meat of the issue. For instance, your statement here.

"No one has threatened to drive Palestinians into the Sea"

(I do believe Ariel Sharon stated an intent to do exactly that, actually. I imagine he said it with a note of irony, of course.)

So, let's say that no, nobody's threatened to drive Palestinians into the sea. So what? What you're saying is that the threat is all that matters. That meaningless words are an ample reason for Israel to have nukes. No doubt you use these feeble ravings from the quite dead Yassir Arafat to excuse pretty much anything from Israel.

It doesn't much matter that the Palestinians are demonstrably incapable of backing up this rhetoric. The fact that the rhetoric exists is all that really matters. Similarly, the actions Israel has perpetrated against the people of Palestine doesn't matter, because there is no rhetoric to go with it.

How weird is that, really? That we demand substance and meaning from our own politics, but will often refuse substance in favor of rhetoric when it comes to international politics? Is it just that we don't really care as much what goes on in other nations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. You're talking to someone who claimed that Alan (torture is just swell) Dershowitz "rawks"
Tells you all you need to know about Mr. Sagle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. No kidding?
Well, I'm a painful optimist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. No kidding. He won't deny it either, though I wish he would.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Hey, Jim, still sucking up to the torture loving Dersh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. well, they do have a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree. Neither of them should own nukes.
Both countries are run by batshit insane fanatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Israel would have been gone long ago without a deterrent.
Edited on Mon May-11-09 04:24 PM by sellitman
I'm sure that would be fine with many here but they won't ever give them up.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. So you don't think Israel could defend itself with conventional arms alone?
Odd, because my history books seem to show them wiping the floor with any Arab country that has had the balls to attempt a full-scale war in the past 50 years, all without the use of nuclear weapons.

Even without their nuclear stockpile, their standing army is more than a match for battles against any of their enemies. This is even more true when you consider that no US president would stand idly by and watch Israel be destroyed by an invading force (unless you believe the BS that Rush and Hannity spew).

Their nuclear weapons are pointless to the extreme, and should be disposed of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Their last War with Hezbollah shows how wrong you are.
It wasn't as one sided as you paint. Surrounded by countries that would all love to see Israel destroyed I am glad they have the deterrent. You can bet they will never give it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Funny that.
When I was riding a Boomer I thought *we* were Israel's deterrent.

:shrug:

Go figure.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I would say it's a Three-Way Deterrence, and has been for years.
Here's something a bit more rigorous on that topic: http://dailykos.com/story/2008/9/23/606257/-Obama-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinaforjustice Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Iran is Right. Israel is Dangerous.
The U.S. invaded Iraq, claiming among other falsities, that Saddam was trying to build nukes, which he was not. The same neo-conservatives who brought us the Iraq invasion want to attack Iran for wanting a nuclear power for its energy system. Meanwhile, Israel has successfully hidden the nukes it has and our ally, Pakistan, was threatening to use its nukes on India. Meanwhile, the U.S. has more nukes than any other country on the planet. What hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Incorrect, Russia maintains the largest stockpile..
Israel did not sign the npt. Iran did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Israel is dangerous? Only to those who intend to destroy it, as everybody damn well knows.
Edited on Mon May-11-09 07:48 PM by Jim Sagle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Or at least, those who Israel claims intend to destroy it, such as Iran
How the hell do you talk out both sides of your mouth like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Iran's leader has expressed a desire to wipe Israel off the map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Of course he has
Well. Except that he's not the leader.
Oh and also, the fact that he's more accurately expressed a desire to see Israel off the map
He also thinks this will be accomplished by a descendant of Mohammed who will descend out of the sky into Mecca, and literally shoots fire from his eyes. Oh, and he flies, too. That Thirteenth Imam is one ninja motherfucker.

So. Yeah. You're telling me that Israel's biggest worry is a guy who's trying to combine all the crazy of Idi Amin, with all the power of a boy scout troupe leader, who's more or less guaranteed to be unemployed by this time next year.

Honestly, if this is Israel's #1 problem, well, I think they got off pretty damn lucky. What's #2, Tel Aviv traffic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Talk to the hand.
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. That's a step up from the brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Really, that's your reply?
Oh. And an emote.

I guess I'll just take those pearls back, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. apples and oranges
Iran can't believe the world holds them and Israel in the same light.

Out of the two, which country has a history of aggression towards its neighbors....I....oh...




....um...never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. responded to wrong post.... nt
Edited on Wed May-13-09 01:15 AM by SteelPenguin
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
31. fair enough ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
35. Nobody should have Nukes
Edited on Wed May-13-09 01:16 AM by SteelPenguin
Israel shouldn't have nukes. Iran shouldn't have nukes. Russia shouldn't have nukes. China shouldn't have nukes. the U.S. shouldn't have nukes. NOBODY SHOULD HAVE NUKES.

NOBODY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-16-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
36. .
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC