Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bible Lesson for Carrie Prejean: "Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord" (Proverbs 12:22)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:33 AM
Original message
Bible Lesson for Carrie Prejean: "Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord" (Proverbs 12:22)
Busted Lying: Carrie Prejean Topless Shots Taken THIS Year, Post-Implants

Carrie Prejean -- Who's the Boob Now?

Those topless photos of Miss USA California Carrie Prejean were taken after she turned 18, according to one of her former pageant sponsors. This contradicts Carrie's position that she posed for the pics when she was only 17.

We obtained an email sent by the sponsor (we were asked not to use his name) and he says Carrie sent him one of the topless photos after January 6, 2009, asking "if she was in good enough shape for the Miss USA Pageant." The date is significant, because that's the day Carrie got a boob job. The former sponsor says the pic was post boob job and she was well over 18.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/05/11/carrie-prejean-whos-the-boob-now/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've _never_ believed she was a minor when the photos were taken.
Edited on Mon May-11-09 09:38 AM by Heidi
I believe she used the "I was only 17" thing to bully folks into not publishing them on blogs and in print, with the implication being that re-publishing the photos would be tantamount to distributing child porn. The side-boob in the first photo released didn't look like a breast that needed augmentation.

Edited for clarity and additional SPLEEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Different photos can be taken in different years.
This doesn't answer whether she was 17 at the time that the first published photo was taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. You know what? Who cares?? So what?
Edited on Mon May-11-09 09:45 AM by Gman
I've become more than a little perturbed at the attacks on Prejean and I'm appalled at the frenzy to dig out pics of her. If that doesn't remind you (generic "you", not necessarily the OP) of what FreeRepublic does when they attack someone, I don't know what does, or you're just clueless. The frenzy around here about Prejean approached FreeRepublic's frenzy over the Bush National Guard memos. Well, maybe not that bad, but it wasn't unlike taking a stick and stirring up a fire ant bed.

Prejean has an opinion and she made the god-awful mistake of expressing it. She may be wrong, but you know what? That's her opinion and she's entitled to express it anywhere she wants. We all have the right to stick our foot in our mouths anytime we want. But I don't believe she was malicious in expressing her opinion and she damn sure doesn't deserve to be attacked as she has been especially to the point of scouring the internet for naked pics of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not according to the rules she agreed to she's not
Edited on Mon May-11-09 09:52 AM by Bluenorthwest
She's not entitled to express her own opinions when she's being Miss CA. She's there to be Miss CA. She lied to the organization. She said there were no pictures, then said that she was 'young and stupid' when she took them in January!
Face it, these gas bag hypocrites need to be called on the carpet about the fact that they are in breach of the religion they use to oppress others. They are not premitted to lie, cheat, and slander. The rules of her religion are for her to follow, not for her to shove at other people.
Her word was false, her witness false. She lies and she cheats. I could spend all day long posting verses from her religion that condemn her for her actions. All day long. So. Those that do not keep a faith have zero standing to spew that faith at others. Those who agree to certain rules to gain a position, who sign a contract, and then ignore their word need to shut the fuck up about what other people do.
She breached her contract with lies and nudity. Praise the Lawd! Facts are not attacks. The truth will set us free!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. If she was asked about "semi-nude" photos, and...
Edited on Mon May-11-09 01:17 PM by Eric J in MN
...none of the photos show her nipples, then she wasn't lying when she said No.

The modeling term for a photo which shows some of a breast but not the nipple is "implied nudity" (if she seems to not be wearing a top.)

It's doesn't matter how much clothing she was wearing, it's what the camera recorded. If a woman is nude when only her face is photographed, that isn't a nude photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. It's not her opinion but her hypocrisy that irks me.
Sure, she's entitled to her opinion, but when she says her opinion is based on her religion and then she turns around and flat out lies, to me, that is pure and simple hypocrisy.

I hate these holier-than-thou religious hypocrites who use the Bible to justify their bigotry while at the same time ignoring the parts of the Bible that apply to them!

And she's put herself in this position. If, after the Miss USA uproar she just let it go, and went about doing her Miss California "duties," that would be one thing, but instead, she decides to become a political activist by teaming up with an anti-gay organization and even making commercials for them! As the saying goes, if you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I don't like them either
Edited on Mon May-11-09 11:31 AM by Gman
but when someone gets attacked like she has it has the effect of simultaneously `1) generating sympathy for the attackee and 2) making the attackers look pretty damn nasty and vindictive. Do we want to be perceived as nasty and vindictive? Not me.

I think a "thank you Ms. Prejean for your uninformed and unenlightened opinion, now please excuse us while we go about the business of changing the country. We finished our work in Iowa but there's more states we have to work on." will suffice and leave it at that. Ms. Prejean is anything BUT an opinion maker.

Much more than that is freeperish and I'll defend whoever was attacked. Tolerance runs both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Some just don't get the hypocricy..
this is evident in a lot of exposures on DU..I've seen it over and over again.

Like we give a shit if she's topless, bottomless or sideless.. but, when she's out on the hatin' trail she better be freakin' above reproach. But, that never happens with haters..they always have some hidden hypocricy, guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Some just don't get nasty and vindictive...
which is even more evident than anything else on this topic. Do you like appearing nasty and vindictive or would you rather go about the business of making positive change in this country which sells a helluva lot better than nasty and vindictive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Oh please..spare me
your self righteousness, gman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomerang Diddle Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. How is exposing HYPOCRISY nasty and vindictive? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. She wanted to be a public figure, and she's a vocal bigot. She's getting what she asked for.
Edited on Mon May-11-09 12:26 PM by Heidi
She's a bigot, and I don't give a shit whether she's a 21-year-old bigot or a 101-year-old bigot. She craved the spotlight and then used the spotlight as a platform to deny marriage rights to people who are every bit her equals if not better (simply by virtue of their honesty as opposed to her hypocrisy). She couldn't have gotten more attention if she'd BEGGED for it. Color me unimpressed by this half-nekkid, hypocritical, lying attention whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. She didn't ask for this anymore than
the people that got beat up at the Stonewall in New York asked for it. In any event, I'm amazed at how people just cannot take the high road and not stoop to her level or the level of freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. She has done commercials and robo calls for NOM - she has put herself out there n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomerang Diddle Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Why is she off limits?
She's the one who got involved with that anti-gay hate group. She's the one going on James Dobson's radio show spouting her bigotry. She put herself in the political arena by taking these actions. She's not an innocent player.

If she had just gone on and did what she promised, which was to work on behalf of the Special Olympics, instead of becoming politically involved in this issue by publicly supporting two hate groups (NOM and Focus on the Family) I think you'd have a point, but that's not what she did.

To make it worse, while proclaiming her morals are better than everyone elses, it turns out she's a bold faced liar.

As the Bible says, you reap what you sow. In my book, it's called karma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. it would be breach of contract even if I liked her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Jesus H Kee-ryst.
Has this girl ever taken a picture with her shirt ON?

Not that I'm complaining. I really really like shirtless girls. I'm just enjoying watching her squirm after getting all holier-than-thou. That's always fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
workinclasszero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Jeez one lie after another...
Somebody's 15 minutes of fame is just about over. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Awww...but, according to what I've seen on some winger sites,
It's OK to lie, as long as you're doing it for Jebus.

Like the bumber sticker says: I'm not perfect; I'm FORGIVEN.

That's their license. No other facts matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Liars for Jesus
Isn't that the new GOP slogan? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Something like that, no doubt. I don't think they've been
able to agree on one, yet. It's between "I've got mine. Screw you, buddy!" and "Kill all liberal slime."

They'll still be fighting about which slogan to use in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. That's exactly what they think..but Jesus wasn't
a liar and I'm thinking He wouldn't want these assholes Lying for Him.

That just use that as an easy excuse to try and get away with their failing as human beings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Aren't fake unatural boobs an abomination to the lord?
Why didn't she like the ones God gave her? Maybe God doesn't want her going around half naked trying to turn guys on for a living. Maybe he thought she should do something more important with her life. (sorry guys)

And she has a problem with teh gays? I find being gay a bit more natural than say stuffing shit in your body to make your boobs bigger. How utterly shallow and pathetic. What is with these so called Christians who want to wait until they are married to kiss, but have no problem looking like hookers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. By no means. As it is written in Paul's Epistle to The Babes...
Chapter 3

1. And go ye forth and expand thy bosoms, that ye become comely
2. In the eyes of men. For the Lord commandeth that the daughters of Eve
3. Shall entice the sons of Adam unto eternity.
4. And let the women who had small breasts hide them away,
5. For they are an abomination.
6. And the hag and the uncomely women
7. Should go into their closets where they cannot be seen by men,
8. For they are ugly and not pleasing to the lord.

Most Bibles don't include this book, but a copy of it was found in a cache of parchment scrolls in 1948, and hidden in the Vatican's "Room of Stuff Nobody Gets to See" in the archives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. and ye shall dress like a slut while proclaiming to be a virgin
ye shall dress, behave, perform for enticement meanwhile speaketh of abstinence, then use ye baby to promote said abstinence. (sorry not as good as you in the church speak:rofl:)

'Stuff Nobody Gets to See'? Except for the young 'Christian' role models...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. LOL...Chapter 3, indeed.
Nice touch.

BTW, I'm emailing this response to all the people in my "special" address book.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Proof-Texting 'r' Us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Roses on a piano are worth less than tulips on an organ. Thus saith the lord." - Stopbush 12:17
Or, was that, two lips?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wow...a lying Christian hypocrite....
...whodda throught.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. She took a photo and wrote a letter the day she got a boob job? Is she Superwoman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. The OP says "after January 6, 2009" not "on" that date. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. It was a lose lose situation
either way..but the best part is she's a documented liar who needed to be stopped on the hate trail.

Why do these haters always have some hidden hypocricy? It freakin' never fails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
33. delete
Edited on Mon May-11-09 04:17 PM by Ilsa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
34. Miss California:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. LOL! That says it all! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC