Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unintentional humor from the right-wing - today's letters to the editor:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:29 AM
Original message
Unintentional humor from the right-wing - today's letters to the editor:
I always love these. It is great to get a laugh first thing in the morning and this one is a classic:

http://www.pennlive.com/letters/index.ssf/2009/05/blame_for_economic_mess_rests.html

Although the part about watching FOX religiously isn't really necessary. The rest of the letter SCREAMS that!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. How to be totally misinformed.......
and wilfully ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suede1 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. You'd have to go to the Creationist Museum to find that much misinformation on display.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sure, all the problems in America just happened in the last 100 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Cavanaugh Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Censoring Fairness"
"Unintentional Right-Wing Humor?"

While it was wildly entertaining reading Brian Jennings' new
book, "Censorship: The Threat to Silence Talk
Radio", the title and content of Mr. Jennings' new
offering does seem somewhat suspect to this Liberal Loser,
Environmentalist Wacko, Long Ago Long-Haired, Dope-Smoking
Hippy, Femi-Nazi.

Fair?

It's hard fitting "fair" into framework. As Supreme
Court
Justice Potter Stewart once ruled on obscenity, he couldn't
define
it, but knew it when he saw it.

Having over 90% of government regulated, publicly owned
AM/FM radio airwaves devoted to right-wing commentary is
simply unfair. And this 90% plus percentage is, pun intended,
a conservative estimate.

Such dominance in the last two decades came about through the
mechanics of "free market" economics. It's The
Golden Rule 2.0."He Who Has The Gold-- Rules."
Commercial sponsorship commands programming. Business loves
Rush, Sean, Glenn and Mark.

As of this week, Fresno, California, has four full-time talk
stations, KMJ-AM (580), KMJ-FM (105.5), KJZN (105.9) and
KYNO-AM (1330), all devoted to Conservative thought. For
example, between 9 AM and Noon, it's Glenn Beck against Rush
Limbaugh vs. Dennis MIller opposite Laura Ingram.

In earlier times, the Federal Communications Commission
enforced what came to be known as "The Fairness
Doctrine". This
was a policy, not a law, firm definition proving elusive. It
just
meant all sides of important issues should be heard.

It was never meant to shut people down, but open discussion
up.

In August of 1987, under President Ronald Reagan, the FCC
abolished the Doctrine.

In August of 1988, Rush Limbaugh, through the magic of newly
emerging satellite technology, began national syndication with
radio stations unhampered by the need to offer reasonable
rebuttal. Ratings scored, profits soared and "Rush
Rooms" flourished coast-to-coast. With lemming-like
instinctive drive at full throttle, rewarded by riches, the
American broadcast industry took a right hand turn, now
intransigently locked in place.

Might I suggest that when 2009 financial covenants can't be
met, taxpayer owned (or owed) banks should seize the stations
and/or broadcast groups
which they funded and transfer the facilities in Federal
Communications Commission-sanctioned public auctions to local
interests.

In such transactions, former employees would receive special
consideration, including the opportunity to be considered for
small-business loans to not only gain control but participate
in
common, community-oriented ownership.

It's only fair.

Peter Cavanaugh
WildWednesday.com
Oakhurst, California
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC