Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Please Shut Up, You Dumb Conspiracy Theorists" (David Sirota)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 03:41 PM
Original message
"Please Shut Up, You Dumb Conspiracy Theorists" (David Sirota)
Okay, maybe a little late, but hey, something to think about? I know, DU Primary Season will last, at the very least, til 02/05/08....enjoy:

http://davidsirota.com/index.php/2006/12/14/please-shut-up-you-dumb-conspiracy-theorists/

I hate blogging about blogging, but I wanted to raise a bit of a concern about the strange conspiracy theory-ish tick among a small but vocal minority of bitter souls in the netroots that serves to further the image of the blogosphere as a place only for fringe lunatics, rather than thinking people. This image, of course, is inaccurate - but it doesn’t help when the discourse is infested with wild, off base and totally unsubstantiated theories that have absolutely no shred of connection to reality. My beef is with this: whenever a blogger asks substantive questions of one Democratic presidential candidate, that person usually gets accused of, at best, helping the right, or more often, working for and being paid by another presidential candidate.

This first kind of attack is irritating in the same kind of way the Bush administration regularly accuses its opponents of aiding and abetting terrorists when anyone asks an honest question about the Iraq War. Sorry, folks - “democracy” doesn’t mean just sitting back and staying silent while D.C. insiders coronate celebrities with party nominations for the most powerful office on the Planet Earth. Similarly, asking our candidates to explain themselves and what they would actually do in office is not helping our opponents - it’s doing our civic duty.

But it is this second line of attack (see this post’s comments for a typical example) that really gets me even angrier, because it is so boldly dishonest. Whenever I have posed questions about the factual record of any of the presidential candidates - whether its Obama, or Clinton or anyone else - inevitably I am accused by some commenters and some other bloggers of doing it because I am being paid by another candidate. They don’t want to talk about actual issues, or any of the factual points I bring up. And, of course, they offer no proof of their diversionary accusations because there actually IS no proof because I actually don’t work for another presidential candidate, nor have I even talked to any presidential candidates about working for them.

I was diligent about noting my work for Ned Lamont in every post I wrote about Ned when I was working for him. I have full disclosure on my blogs about what I do for a living. But that none of that - not the lack of proof nor my record of disclosure - seems to matter to these very angry, very sad, very bitter, very pathetic people who make these groundless accusations.

I’m not sure what can be done about this tiny but annoyingly loud and overly spastic/aggressive minority of people who have absolutely no regard for the truth, and in the process, are degrading the reputation of the blogosphere as a whole. All I would say to them, I guess, is please shut your traps you dumb, inane conspiracy theorists. If you want to have a debate about the substance, bring it on. But just because you can’t defend your agendas on the actual substance and facts doesn’t mean you have to destroy the credibility of the netroots with absurd, dishonest accusations pulled straight from the inner folds of your rectum.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh come on you can't believe that
Not only is he getting paid by David Sirota; he actually is David Sirota. You can't expect him to be unbiased when it comes to David Sirota!

He's clearly part of a conspiracy of one to promote the world view of David Sirota!

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I do believe that....
:shrug:

Next candidate...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well said. But which candidate put him up to saying it?
:P:evilgrin::P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BruceMcF Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Which candidate put you up to asking that? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sirota notices that now those of us who are against Irai Occupation, Crooks and Liars in our Gov.
are now the "unwashed, hippie fringe, lunatic FRINGIES who are trying to support our Democratic House & Senate.

Sirota understands...but so few want to BELIEVE...what's being THROWN AT US BY MS Corporate Whore Media!

And, WHAT does the Corporate Whore Media get out of their "Lock Step with Bushies?"

One does wonder. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC