|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:14 PM Original message |
Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar Sets Gray Wolves Up for Slaughter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Madness! In another 10 years they will be put back on the ES list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. I don't give them that long. 10 months maybe. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 01:23 AM Response to Reply #18 |
33. So around the same time that the inflation resulting from criminally complicit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. Species are not meant to be on the endangered species list forever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. pfft |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Ditto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Nice rationalization there, but real "recovery" would mean intact ecosystems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. fcking ranchers. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. It's not a rationalization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. And of course the law is never wrong, and never designed to protect special interests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 10:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. When the species was originally listed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 11:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I think "cooked up a number" gets it exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 02:14 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. How many wolves do you think there should be in the lower 48? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. It's not a "sucess story" because of the habitat loss... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 10:54 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. Just because they are not endangered doesn't mean I should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 07:00 AM Response to Reply #27 |
39. Because succeeding administrations were powerless to change the number? Come on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 11:49 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. The people who had knowledge in this area |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 09:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. You're mistaken, this is more complicated than it seems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 10:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. exactly right -- the idea that the species is "recovered" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 01:02 AM Response to Reply #23 |
32. Thanks. We know that. Or some of us. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. I am sure that sometime down the line, there will some alien species that will say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I'm all in favor of delisting humans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 09:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
43. You and they ought to know better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 07:18 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Since you mentioned science, where are you getting your numbers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 07:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
47. Yes - and then other species in more desperate shape can get help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. What justification is being offered for this? Seems like a bad idea to me... *n/t* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. The Secretary of the Interior is a rancher. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 07:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
48. Because that's how the Endangered Species List works - and many less flashy species |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. A stomach-turning decision!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
11. SoI Salazar has a history of letting prejudice guide him. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Seems a lil premature to say science is back. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. the "change we can believe in" is`t working..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 07:04 AM Response to Reply #14 |
40. Warren Buffet has the same number of votes as you do. Never shut up. Our problem is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
15. Decision sounds premature. From the article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. Ken Salazar is a total asshole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 07:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Itis imformation and links like this that make DU so informative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 01:59 AM Response to Reply #19 |
34. When the report is accurate - this one isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 05:40 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. link? proof? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. Another Bush lite cabinet member. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
17. This will bring about open season on wolves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 10:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. You think people aren't out plugging bald eagles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 05:39 AM Response to Reply #28 |
36. If they are, they are committing a Federal level felony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #36 |
45. This is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. This news makes me nauseous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
21. the wolves have reach their target number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-05-09 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
30. A moment when we can see whether the pledge to keep politics and science separate was sincere n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
31. Kicking this in utter frustration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
38. K & R in disgust nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
41. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-06-09 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
42. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 06:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC