Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds are looking at Edwards' campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:21 AM
Original message
Feds are looking at Edwards' campaign

Investigators dig through records to see if donors' money was used to cover up affair with campaign worker.
By Mandy Locke

Posted: Sunday, May. 03, 2009

Federal investigators are sifting through the records of money that helped John Edwards' presidential campaign to determine if any was used to keep quiet his affair with Rielle Hunter.

Edwards, a Democrat and former U.S. senator, acknowledged the investigation to The News & Observer.

“I am confident that no funds from my campaign were used improperly,” Edwards said in a statement.

“However, I know that it is the role of government to ensure that this is true. We have made available to the United States both the people and the information necessary to help them get the issue resolved efficiently and in a timely matter. We appreciate the diligence and professionalism of those involved and look forward to a conclusion.”

Edwards declined to discuss the matter.

A review of Edwards' campaign money will turn up a cluster of nonprofits, some not subject to the same rules of transparency as official campaign organizations.

Records of one group that does disclose donors, the Alliance for a New America, show that Edwards' 2008 campaign got a huge boost from a single source: $3.48 million from a holding company for Rachel “Bunny” Lambert Mellon, a 98-year-old matriarch of industrialist Andrew Mellon's fortune.

<snip>

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/597/story/702132.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Smith_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's fuckeder than fucked.
Back during the primaries I thought he might be a good candidate. Without looking too much into specifics of his policies I took how well he treated his sick wife as a good indicator of his character.... *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. what an interesting story.
"Rachel Lowe Lambert Lloyd Mellon (born August 9, 1910) eldest daughter of Gerard Barnes Lambert, a president of Gillette Safety Razor Co. and a founder of the Warner-Lambert fortune (Warner-Lambert is now part of Pfizer, following a 2000 merger). Her mother was the former Rachel Lowe (later Mrs Malvern Clopton).

In 1932, Rachel Lowe Lambert married Stacy Barcroft Lloyd Jr. Divorced in 1948, she married, as her second husband, the banking heir and art collector Paul Mellon... The couple bred and raced thoroughbred horses, including a winner of the Kentucky Derby.

Mellon was a longtime friend of John Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy advising Mrs. Kennedy first on fine arts and antiques during the Kennedy White House restoration, and then contributing to the design of the grounds of the president's house."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Lambert_Mellon

Paul Mellon KBE (June 11, 1907 – February 1, 1999)...co-heir to one of America's greatest business fortunes, created by his grandfather Thomas Mellon, his father Andrew W. Mellon, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury from 1921 to 1932; and his father's brother Richard B. Mellon. In 1957, when Fortune prepared its first list of the wealthiest Americans, it estimated that Paul Mellon, his sister Ailsa Mellon-Bruce, and his cousins Sarah Mellon and Richard King Mellon, were all amongst the richest eight people in the United States, with fortunes of between 400 and 700 million dollars each.

...He was survived by his wife, Rachel (a.k.a. Bunny), his children, Catherine Conover (first wife of John Warner) and Timothy Mellon, and two stepchildren, Stacy Lloyd III and Eliza, Viscountess Moore. Paul Mellon's foremost philanthropic interest was his alma mater, Yale University.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Mellon

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sure wish i knew which faction was after his ass, & why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I can't think of any political reason for anyone to go after his ass
he's about as much of a political threat as the dodo. If he were a repuke and the situation was exactly the same, DUers would be cheering an investigation. Anyway, Edwards was never a threat to the corpocracy he very much a member of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. sure are a lot of bad things happening to him. like spitzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. so both spitzer and edwards are just passive victims of some evil cabal
undoubtedly there are people exploiting the fuck ups of both men, but that they both fucked up is undeniable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. impeccable timing/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. timing or not, it's virtually impossible to
ieep something like Edward's affair secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. not impossible to keep it secret from the public. many, many examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. really? you mean like Gary Hart?
This isn't the 1960s. It's virtually impossible to keep something like what JE did secret. He was a high profile candidate for the nomination for prez. The rumors were there almost from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #39
83. no, like bush 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. Bush I was Director of the CIA. He has some experience at keeping secrets.
And frankly, the skeletons in his closet are a lot worse than an affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. his affair = public knowledge in dc, but doesn't make the news. similar
to many political cheaters on the right side of the power structure.

it's who ya know, not whatcha know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #88
102. Neither did any of his CIA activities.
Many of which coups, terrorist attacks, death squads, arms-for-hostages deals, assassinations and general state-sponsored death and destruction.

If anyone knows how to cover things up and silence whistleblowers, it's the Bush crime family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
37. In what way is the timing impeccable?
The primaries are over, Obama won, John Edwards is a threat to absolutely no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
63. Think again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. They can both be investigated at the same time. Still, Edwards is a threat to
no one anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. In reference to post #3. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobburgster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. This seems random
It does seem a bit Ken Starr-ish to simply start an investigation on a 'what if . . .', unless there was some tip off that there were improprieties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. we know that Edward's mistress was being paid off
where the money came from is another question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. & we know how rare corruption in campaign financing is. i mean, the obvious
target for an investigation would be john edwards & his mistress, cause sex is the worst kind of corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. you're confused.
the investigation isn't about sex. it's about misuse of campaign funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. i'm not confused. said misuse is small-time payoff to mistress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. oh, so if he did misuse campaign funds, it's ok with you
because it was only to a mistress and because it was only a few hundred thousand. I relish your hypocrisy. it's a riot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. yep, i save my outrage for murder, phoney wars, & sending everyone to the poorhouse.
sex on the campaign dime - routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
66. seems to me
you save your outrage chiefly for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #66
76. wtf? you're out to lunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #66
94. seems to me
you save your outrage chiefly for Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. It is as random as
Edited on Sun May-03-09 06:29 AM by cornermouse
cali's non-stop attacks on Edwards is random. Smaller tents are so much cozier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. tut tut. don't attack me
because you're upset about your idol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I don't have an idol.
I'm not waiting for someone to save me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanbean Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
105. Be nice, Cali. You're "on one" again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. heh. i wondered why she cared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. here's why I care:
I pegged Johny as a hypocrite of the worst sort back in 2003. I knew he was a self-serving, narcissistic type who cared only about himself. When he adopted his anti-poverty platform, I contrasted that with his record in the Senate and with his actions- working for a very sleazy hedge fund, profitting off the misery of those afflcted in NO, building a truly monstrous energy sucking house, paying for his beauty care with campaign funds, etc. and I knew he diddn't give a flying fuck about poverty. I criticized him when he was DU's progressive darling, because I knew it was a scam. I got rafts of shit for daring to criticize St. John of the Hedge Fund. Rather satisfying to see I was right about the piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. self-serving, narcissistic - how unusual in politics.
corrupt & deceitful - oh, my, my. shocking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobburgster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. I thought that was listed in the job requirements!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. didn't say it was shocking.
not shocking at all, but if he used campaign funds to pay off his mistress, it's blatantly illegal. don't like that it's illegal? maybe you should lead a fight to relax campaign spending laws.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. Oh wow, you brought up his haircut?
That hasn't been debunked enough for you yet? And by the way you haven't been proven right about anything. The man had an affair. It's between him and his wife. You do know he's not the first presidential candidate, or indeed president, to do so yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. debunked? oh please.
it's been well documented that 2 haircuts were originally paid for by the campaign. they were in disclosure forms. And it was only after the stir about them, that JE reimbursed the campaign.

And sure I've been proven right by the sleaze's actions. he cut ties with his anti-poverty program at UNC, he shut down his scholarship program. he worked for a scummy hedge fund and invested big time in it. his record in the Senate is center right.

And he isn't the first candidate to cheat on his wife, but he's in the company of such slime sucking pieces of shit as McCain and Gringrich when it comes to cheating on gravely ill wives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. And Clinton and Kennedy
Wives not gravely ill, but I don't think that changes much do you? Seems an arbitrary standard if so. Enjoy your hatred of the "sleaze" though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. I think it;'s significant
but they were sleazes as well, and Bill abused his office with his affair with a very young subordinate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #38
67. No comparison to Jackie...
Jackie Kennedy knew and didn't care. She came from a world where men had wives and mistresses. Her mother didn't divorce her father because he had too many mistresses. Her mother divorced her father because he didn't have enough money to support the lifestyle she wanted to become accustomed to. Her mother became an Auchincloss. Jackie remained a Bouvier. And adored her father. Mistresses and all.

Jackie Kennedy also didn't feel the need to publicly turn her husband into a victim as Hillary and Elizabeth have. She in fact never said a word. And wouldn't have. Even if others had. Some did along the way. And that was the last time they said anything at all to her.

I really am tired of the comparisons of various political wives and first ladies to Jackie Kennedy. There is no comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #67
91. Thank you: "She came from a world where men had wives and mistresses"- spot on.
The "outrage" - on all sides - is strictly for the rubes in the provinces. Upper-class marriages are often business & dynastic arrangments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #91
96. and if the mellon matriarch gave 3 million to edwards kind of under the table & his finances
Edited on Sun May-03-09 06:44 PM by Hannah Bell
are still being investigated, i'd guess there's a bit of deep politics going on.

not just a bimbo scare.

3 million from one very rich donor, family long involved at the pinnacle of ruling class politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #36
54. Now, if you go over to the OTHER side...
Sarah Palin's traveling hairstylist earned $750 per day, and her traveling makeup artist earned around $1000 per day. Even if you believe the wildest Republican estimate of Edwards' stylist expenses, they work out to less than one day of Palin's combined services or two days of just her hair service. Surprise, kids: campaigning is expensive and appearance is paramount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. These 527s are the devil
They should be outlawed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. pssttt.
“Fanaticism consists in redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim.”
—Life of Reason, Reason in Common Sense, Scribner's, 1905, p. 13"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. This is little more than a caricature.
Edited on Sun May-03-09 06:50 AM by cornermouse
Bye bye cali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. "it's people like you...."
You have this habit of turning every discussion into something personal. You attack the poster, not the idea. It's kind of transparent Cali. Please stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. uh, look upthtead. I made my comments in response to an attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
20. This looks like "new commander syndrome" to me
All us old spldiers know when you get a new commander you better be on your very best behavior, because damn near every one of them is going to go looking for someone to nail really, really hard so his subordinates will know he means business and his rater will know he won't tolerate misbehavior. In this case, though, you're looking at the potential for very serious crimes--sexual indiscretion is a serious career killer for 21st-century Democratic politicians. (Republican politicians can survive it--David Vitter will probably be reelected in 2010. Democrats are damn near expected to not have sex with their own wives.)

Unfortunately for Edwards, there really might be something there, which would enable the Justice Department to throw the book at him in an effort to prove how tough they are.

I just hope that while they're trying to figure out all of Edwards' sexual peccadilloes and how campaign finance funds could have been used to cover them up, they've also got an Office of Bush Administration Atrocity Investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. ncs = investigating someone in your own party for some minor pecadillo?
while giving trillions to banksters for their good work in destroying the world economy?

heckuva job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
29.  sorry, there's nothing illegal or potntially illegal about the bank bailouts
I find your defense of JE, funny as hell in a wholly hypocritical way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #24
55. No, the bank payoffs are separate from the Edwards investigation
Unlike Republicans, Democrats are capable of doing two things at once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
57. This is not minor.
Not if he used campaign funds to cover up his affair.

Edwards is scum of the earth and we are so lucky he didn't win. It would another Clinton (whom I also basically despise for his bimbo eruptions). I hope he stays out of politics completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
62. The "new commander" hardly has a role in this except in not replacing
Edited on Sun May-03-09 10:12 AM by jbnow
the 50 AGs. Well 49 since Durbin says they are keeping Fitzgerald on.

The investigation is being conducted by the office of U.S. Attorney George Holding, based in Raleigh, and a federal grand jury could consider evidence. Holding declined to comment on Edwards.

Holding, a Republican, has helped prosecute several prominent Democrats. His office is also investigating a real estate development and car deals involving former Gov. Mike Easley.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. Edwards's finances have always been a target
Because they're so convoluted and secret. He's had to pay a good number of FEC fines over the years. I doubt this investigation even started in the Obama administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #32
68. It's still much ado about nothing...
All of these investigations are much ado about nothing. There are more important issues. More important issues to the American people anyway. But then, well, the American people really don't matter do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #68
72. it doesn't matter if there are more important issues to the American people
that's not what investigations into criminal behavior should be based on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
35. Sorry if I fail to have any sympathy for my formerly favorite candidate
That little "rush fundraising day" A million in a day or whatever it was he held literally days before he dropped out kind of smelled bad at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
42. Everyone seems to be on a moral high horse about Edwards and never felt that way about Clinton
Seems strange to me...

I asked what makes it different in another thread, got only one response and it didn't really seem satisfying to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. I had plenty to say about Clinton and Lewinsky
I didn't favor impeachment but I certainly criticize him sharply for that. So did JE for that matter. Hypocrisy much?

And I answered you in another thread. When the Flowers story came out, Clinton didn't deny it. Instead he went on TV and did the mea culpa thing. Pretty repulsive, but people knew what they were getting with him. JE denied it until after he dropped out. Also, there's the fact that JE made this big deal about the sanctity of his marriage and using it to justify his opposition to marriage equality. Not to mention his cheating on a gravely ill wife and using her as an attack dog while he was cheating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. I definitely agree about the JE hypocrisis re: comments toward Clinton
Interesting other points also...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #42
53. I thought Clinton should resign
Edited on Sun May-03-09 08:59 AM by shadowknows69
Not for a blowjob but for lying to us.


edit to add: And I thought Edwards was scum for even having run knowing he had dirty laundry that would have cost us the election probably had he been the nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #53
60. For lying to us? Not to the court? Anyone can feel free
to lie to me about their legal sex life unless it is my business...like they are my spouse/lover. Clinton was not.

Though I admit if I had really cared and then believed it when he lied and so felt relieved that the scandal wouldn't go anywhere or impede his presidency...I'd be more upset.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #60
73. That's what I meant mostly
Our President shouldn't lie to us or our courts, except perhaps in matters of extreme national security, ever. Maybe I hold my leaders to too high of standards. Could be why I haven't been more than 60% happy with one of them ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #53
69. He shouldn't have lied...
He should have just smiled and walked off when the question was asked instead of engaging in semantics. It was the semantics rather than the lie that disturbed everyone the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #69
70. um, no. Clinton was under oath. Smiling and walking off were not options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #70
103. Makes you wonder how Clinton ever got under oath.
* , shooter and the gang simply refused. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
104. Everyone that says this line. Do you realize Edwards was on a high horse
in regards to Clinton's affair? If not search Edwards, precious daughter, clinton. It should come up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #104
107. I do, but I fail to see the relevance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
43. Say it ain't so, Johnny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
44. an investigation like this may force him to acknowldege soemthing else as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
47. He's another asshole
that couldn't keep it in his pants. I could give a shit what the guy does in private, but his life wasn't private. He was running for president! Did the idiot learn nothing from the Clinton blow job fiasco? And whether or not you think his affair was a private matter, the repukes would have ran with it forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. his sleazoid affair was the least of my concerns with him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Two down or would that be kicked?
and one to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. I take it you're referring to Spitzer
who's the third?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
49. The Feds have better things to do than this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. What is the U.S. Attorney for NC supposed to be doing?
got any specific things you think he should be focusing on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. There are a lot of Big Banks headquartered in N.C.
How about going back to see how much fraud was committed within these banks, by either the bank or officers of the bank?

That would serve a greater good than going after a "has been" that committed political suicide. But hey, since a Democrat is in the White House, we have to stick with sex investigations only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem629 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #58
74. How is this a "sex investigation"?
That he had an affair is no reason to dismiss the concerns of how campaign money was spent. Is that some kind of defense? I don't think so.

And is there a shortage of investigators in NC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. And how much campaign money is spent on family members of politicians?
It becomes a 'sex investigation,' when the only focus is on going after a politician who had an extramarital girlfriend on the payroll too. Like it or not, she still did a job for his campaign. If you want to investigate it, then you had better investigate all other politicians for campaign impropriety with all of their spouses, children, siblings, etc. etc.

Now, how about using the investigators to go after fraud within the banking industries headquartered in North Carolina, since that had widespread damage to the people of this country, instead of focusing on the juicy tabloid investigation?

That is my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #75
84. that's not what's being investigated as I understand it.
the problem is payments made by Baron, Edwards former campaign finance chairman to Hunter, not the money she was paid for her work for the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #84
98. As I stated in my reply...
"If you want to investigate it, then you had better investigate all other politicians for campaign impropriety with all of their spouses, children, siblings, etc. etc."

By investigating 'payments made by Baron, Edwards former campaign finance chairman to Hunter,' it still goes down the slippery slope of targeting a juicy tabloid issue related to SEX and infidelity. How many other Representatives / Politicians have had the people in their campaigns or their financiers pay their spouses, children, siblings, 'sex toys,' etc. etc. for underhanded dealings and/or reasons? If all investigators were only to investigate all the politicians for such impropriety, the investigators probably could not come close to uncovering all the fraud and corruption that takes place. Besides, it's not like they are investigating the banking industry or military industrial complex paying blackmail money for a politician, keeping his squeeze, or buying a politician off. I know it sucks for poor people to give him precious money to be wasted on paying anything for her, but that would be better than any Wealthy Elite Industry in a representative's pocket and on a leash.

I did NOT argue that what he, or any other politician doing this, wasn't wrong. My point was that there are major financial institutions headquartered in North Carolina. So why in the Hell are we wasting our time on a "HAS BEEN" that already committed political suicide, with his sexual infidelity? Someone close to me worked at Wachovia, and she quit when she realized what they had turned into and what they were doing, well before their fall.

Wouldn't it be wiser to use precious resources going after major financial institutions and their officers, who had a hand in wrecking the economy, which would actually clean up and/or deter the fraud and corruption that directly affects the American People?

John Edwards will NEVER be back in politics, because people that believed in him, will never trust him again. Barack Obama would still be President, even if John Edwards had NEVER been in the Primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
56. What an asshole.
I am sure glad I didn't vote for this piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
59. I googled "Francis Hunter"
Edited on Sun May-03-09 09:50 AM by Holly_Hobby
Of course, Fox has a picture, on her 1st birthday. It's a shame she's going to be another innocent victim.

http://www.foxnews.com/photoessay/0,4644,4789,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #59
71. I get the sense that Edwards would reproduce asexually if budding were an option
I'm not saying he wants to clone himself, but he does seem to be in the market for a male heir, and his choice of meiosis partner resembles Edwards in a wig (IMO), so I almost think Edwards would be happier as a ringworm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
61. There are a lot of small donors pissed at him that want to know where their money went. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
77. what happened to looking forward...
they have time for this but not for torture investigations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. The U.S. Attorney's office in Raleigh NC is involved in torture investigations? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. They are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. That's what I'm asking you. The U.S. Attorney's office in Raleigh NC has nothing
to do with the torture investigations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. I never said they did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. Then why bring up the torture investigations? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #86
99. because they are part of the same justice department...
that won't investigate torture because we are supposed to be moving forward
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #99
106. No, the attorneys in RALEIGH, NC are investigating Edwards. They have
nothing to do with the torture investigations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. you're confused about what the U.S. Attny's job in NC is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
82. /
Edited on Sun May-03-09 02:57 PM by lame54
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
89. This guy was a real screwball.
I knew there was something about him I didn't like, but I couldn't put my finger on it.

Edwards always seemed too self-righteous, too sanctimonious...I tried to convince myself that his impassioned anti-poverty sermons were genuine and he was a guy I could get behind for President, but I just couldn't do it.

Glad I didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. yep, they were about as genuine as the outrage over his mistress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
92. I am so disappointed in John Edwards
at a time when we were all trying to help the Democrats rebuild, he took advantage for personal gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
93. More heartbreak and humiliation for ex-Edwards supporters like me.
I already posted my feelings about this on another thread, but it is so humiliating to have been so strident in my support for this man during the primaries, where I wasted my vote on this person.

And I pride myself in being able to spot psychopaths, but this one got by me. At least, I'm supposing that he is just another charming psychopath, like Bernard Madoff or Ted Bundy.

Those of you who had that negative feeling about him turned out to be right.

I still have trouble believing all of this.

Mindboggling, disheartening, shocking and embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edith Ann Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. JE
He got by me too. I wonder if his mistress will be investigated for income tax evasion. She got around 300.000 in spending money and rent and plane rides. She didn't declare her income to the IRS. Does that mean I can get a Sugar Daddy to give me money TAX FREE? She had no visible means of support and still doesn't. If someone's giving her money she needs to get a tax accountant. She probably owes somewhere around 30.000 to the FEDS.

She was given checks. There is a record of this money I assume. Je may not be a threat to anyone any more but he is still responsible for his actions. Shame on him for not tell the mistress she needed to file a tax return. He probably didn't want a record with the IRS re: where the money came from. I don't think you go to jail as long for campaign finances as you do for Income Tax Evasion and non reporting of income. That's how they got Al Capone. Living above his means with no visible means of support. Like a Job. Prostitutes declare their income and so should R. Hunter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #93
97. Eh, no reason to feel bad or blame yourself for any of it
It's in the past. The country dodged this bullet. Good news for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #93
101. yeah, i was also duped
i was an edwards supporter in '04 and '08 despite the fact that he was from N.C. (I'm a Virginian so you know *really* liked him to overlook that :))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
100. not supposed to pay hush money to your mistress out of campaign funds Smoove Johnny...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #100
108. He's rich enough, you'd think he could pay hush money out of his own pocket.
But then we are talking about the guy who billed a $300 haircut to his campaign contributors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC