Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Specter was embraced because of his pro-healthcare reform stance and

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 09:40 PM
Original message
If Specter was embraced because of his pro-healthcare reform stance and
his resulting (possible-never say never) vote, are you okay with that?

And even if he wasn't embraced by this admin, no one could have stopped him from changing parties, could they?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. They could have discouraged him, sure,
and he'd have possibly re-thought his plan.

Tell you the truth, I'll take Rove if he were a Senator would vote correctly for health care reform. Yeah, I'm that desperate.

But I think Sen. Specter is a very sick man, and I think he wants to be on a winning side when he dies. I'm SERIES111!! I honestly think he's considering his legacy and where he's going to end up.

During his press conference yesterday, he was wheezing something awful. Those are not the sounds healthy lungs make, and he had a recurrence of his cancer last August, so I think Arlen is making plans.....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wow, I saw the presser and didn't notice wheezing.
I did notice Tweety bringing up his ill health often.

I was shocked to hear he's 79. Didn't know that. And I thought he looks a heckuva lot better than he has in the past.

If he is there because of healthcare, I think he'll be tolerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he helps pass new healthcare plan -- he can stay. If not, to hell with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. I find it amusing that people actually think that we should have "stopped" him.
For what purpose? We may not like his record and I'm sure he'll piss many of us off with his future as a Dem, but this is one hell of a negative for the Republican Party. It's worth it, simply for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Amen. And there's no stopping someone who changes parties. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Plus, with a possible shot at 60, there was *no* chance...
Edited on Wed Apr-29-09 11:50 PM by TwilightZone
that Obama was going to pass up that opportunity.

Sure, we know that once Franken is seated, it's not a solid 60 (thanks to the Blue Dogs, etc.), but perception is a big part of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. it's not clear
. . . that he's going to change anything he does or votes on due to his switch in parties.

I think he could have just stayed where he was. I hope Pa. voters can manage a Democrat to overcome him, despite his switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. He's a big advocate of healthcare research. That might be good enough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. He would surely not have switched without support from party leaders.
If he didn't want to face a Repub. primary and the Democrats didn't promise fundraising and endorsements, I bet he would have retired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC