Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ARTICLE II of the UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 08:33 AM
Original message
ARTICLE II of the UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE
SIGNED BY RONALD REAGAN WHEN HE WAS PRESIDENT

Article 2

1. Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction.

2. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.

3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. says it all.....no exceptional circumstances WHATSOEVER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Under Article II, those who did the torturing are criminals
and must be prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. treaties are for other less exceptional nations to obey
for example, Iran and North Korea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. why do we sign these treaties if we have no intention of abiding by them?
Why not just refuse to sign on to such a treaty? It will only be "politicized" if enforcing it is tried.

What's the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's pretty plain. This is a now a test of moral leadership for the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Straight choice
Moral leadership or conspiracy in furtherance of a crime. Wonder which Obama will chose. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC