Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

War criminal Judith Miller says journalist should have stonewalled...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:11 AM
Original message
War criminal Judith Miller says journalist should have stonewalled...
udith Miller Faults Media Reponse in Libby Affair
March 30, 2007 | 5:05 PM ET | Permanent Link

Former New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who in 2005 spent 85 days in jail for refusing to identify former White House aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby as a confidential source, said Friday she believes the media failed a major test when reporters and news organizations acquiesced to subpoenas issued them by federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, reports U.S. News & World Report media correspondent Liz Halloran.

"Had the press hung together," Miller said, and had more journalists protested the "pro-forma" confidentiality waivers issued by the White House, the damage done to the media during Fitzgerald's investigation into who leaked to reporters the identity CIA operative Valerie Plame would have been much less.

But, as it stands, she said, the investigation and Libby's recent trial that featured a parade of prominent journalists--including Miller--on the witness stand is cause for "enormous concern." Miller, speaking at the National Press Club during a media forum, blamed the nation's deep political divisions for making news organizations wary of fighting the orders to testify.

"These are very difficult times," said Miller, noting that there are at least 70 active subpoenas of journalists--"a chilling prospect.

- more-

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/blogs/news_blog/070330/judith_miller_faults_media_rep.htm?s_cid=rss:site1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck her. She's a CIA asset with a COVER as a reporter anyway,
So she's not even a real reporter. She just plays one on TV.


What a horrible whore she is to continue to argue that this case was about press freedom when really her subpoena was about press COMPLICITY in a CRIME.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. She has the nerve to call herself a journalist?
That's delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. The bimbo still has it backwards...
Edited on Sun Apr-01-07 07:38 AM by Flubadubya
the press was not established to protect the powers that be, it is supposed to protect the public interest from the corruption and misdeeds of those in power.

The right to confidentiality (regarding a journalist's sources) is first and foremost intended to protect whistle blowers from powerful entities, be that governmental, big business, etc. It was NOT intended as a tool for protecting and covering for the crimes of Libby, Abramoff, Cheney, and the like.

This woman, and her ilk, have completely perverted the meaning of the role of journalists and journalism in the United States today! :grr: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. exactly. You hit it on the head.
except Judith Aspen Miller never realized (or forgot) the duty of the fourth estate. But, she has a lot of company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Those reporters should not have been part of the conspiracy in the first place
They should have reported that the bu$h regime was attempting to use them furthering their agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's amazing how these corrupt criminals twist meanings to the exact opposite of reality. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. she tipped off the saudi`s in bridgeport ,illinois
and destroyed a fitzgerald`s case. where did she get here information? some say the whitehouse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. She said:
""Had the press hung together," Miller said, and had more journalists protested the "pro-forma" confidentiality waivers issued by the White House, the damage done to the media during Fitzgerald's investigation into who leaked to reporters the identity CIA operative Valerie Plame would have been much less."

Like the guy standing there with a smoking machine gun in his hands-she still cannot admit it was she who caused the damage to the "media."

Clueless, although a loyal operative. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-01-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. She was protecting a traitor. She "catapulted the propaganda" about Iraq.
Judith Miller has not ink, but BLOOD ON HER HANDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC