|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:02 PM Original message |
Harman responds: if anything should arouse concern, it is that the Bush may have spied on Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. She is right -- We should be concerned that the Bush Admin spyed on Members of Congress... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fireweed247 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. What? We can't be concerned about two things at the same time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demoiselle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. What kind of evidence do we have? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. That's all I'm saying, too. Let's have an official investigation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flying Dream Blues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. That's what she's hoping, I'm sure. Where are the pirates when you need them? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. How about being concerned that you helped BushInc COVER UP wiretapping before the 2004 election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. Indeed, Rep. Harman, that is very concerning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. As opposed to spying on ordinary people, which is OK? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. They weren't spying on her, they were spying on the suspected Israeli operative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. And since there was no warrant how do we know they weren't spying on her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Apparently there was a warrant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Then the warrant describes the parameters of the wiretap and the targets... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. So why wasBushco spying on Rockefeller? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicalboi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
14. How dare they Jane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
15. The art of deflection - "You think I'm bad...Just look at those guys." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-20-09 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
17. She learned well from her Republican colleagues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC