Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diocese sold closed church sans stained glass windows, claiming they are "sacred objects"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 07:32 PM
Original message
Diocese sold closed church sans stained glass windows, claiming they are "sacred objects"
An interesting case. The church itself is not considered sacred, yet the contents can be stripped?

====

WORCESTER — The Worcester Historical Commission has asked the city’s Law Department to investigate whether the Diocese of Worcester violated a municipal ordinance that protects landmarks after church officials removed the stained glass windows from the former Holy Name of Jesus Church on Illinois Street.

The action was taken after Preservation Worcester officials complained that diocesan officials should have sought a waiver from the board of the so-called demolition delay ordinance before removing the windows.

Deborah Packard, executive director of Preservation Worcester, told the Telegram & Gazette that the windows were “architecturally significant” to the historical church and maintained that they fell under the purview of the 13-year-old ordinance.

Meanwhile, chancery officials said that the windows are sacred objects and the diocese had the right to remove them for possible installation at another Roman Catholic church. “These windows are religious objects and canon law dictates that we treat them as sacred items,” said Raymond L. Delisle, diocesan vice chancellor for operations.

Holy Name church was one of five parishes closed by Bishop Robert J. McManus last summer. The red brick church, which sits opposite University Park in Worcester’s Main South neighborhood, was sold for $1 million earlier this year to Belmont A.M.E. Zion Church, which had been looking for a new home since 2006.


http://www.telegram.com/article/20090419/NEWS/904190409/1116
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds a bit odd to me
It sounds a bit odd to me for the church to remove the stained glass like that. The article doesn't say how the incoming Belmont feels about the windows.

The church my great-grandparents were married in was deconsecrated and today is an antiques store. While most of the religious items were removed the glass was left in place. The organ was removed and reinstalled in the other Catholic church in that particular town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. There's a lot going on here. It's possible that the Belmont A.M.E. Zion
Church didn't want those particular stained glass windows if for example they depicted Catholic saints rather than Bibical subjects.

The real problem is that the Catholic hierarchy is arbitrarily shutting down hundreds of viable, active parishes across the country, supposedly because of the shortage of priests. There is a lot of suspicion that parishes are being closed in order to sell the properties to pay off abuse claims. It's hard to see how dumping dozens of church campuses onto the market can raise much money. Here in my town of 10,000, there are already 2 Catholic Churches sitting empty. The stained glass has been stripped from one of them. In Oswego, St. Louis Church has been sitting empty for years, and it will soon be joined by 4 other church buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. sounds like progress
unfortunately, they will probably be replace with megachurches, an even greater blight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You don;t know the half of it
The worst case is in New Orleans. Now, the excuse is that many churches will not be filled again, however, it does not seem like an accident that many of the closed churches are in the poorer areas.

Of course, the way to get more priests is to increase the demand on those that you have already, right? And of course, that insures that the same incompetent fools who have been driving people out of the church stay in. Not like Pope Schutzstaffel could sell a few church treasures now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well
In this case, a Catholic church sold the building to a Protestant one. If the windows had very catholic subjects such as the "Virgin Mary", they would have been out of place in a Protestant Church. Keep in mind, in much of Church architecture, the windows are what set the mood and spirit of the building, especially for the Catholics. Many Protestant denominations make it a point NOT to use ornate windows, because that is a symbol of the break with the Catholics

Now, I admit, the only thing I know about AME Zion is that it is one of the main Afro-American denominations (African Methodist Episcopal Zion), however, I do not know if they would have reacted bad to the Catholic style windows. However, I know many hard line protestant churches would have recoiled at the idea..they probably would have renovated the whole church to get out the Catholic look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Being that the building is a Historic Landmark, the City feels it should be protected.
There is certainly a lot going on in this case!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Its pure BS they will sell them, it was done in my town...
sacred objects. Sacred as in Tiffany most likely depending on the time period. The ones removed here never reappeared locally the last I heard was they were for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. ebay?.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. They are clearly sacred objects. Worcester will lose on this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sacred, yeah... to the highest bidder.
It really isn't all that unusual for the windows to be removed and sold separately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The ultimate insult for Catholics living in the Northeast and the Rust Belt is
the way the hierarchy is abandoning them. It's bad enough to see jobs headed South and West, but when the church your family has been associated with is closed and then stripped to send the furnishings to a new parish in the south or west.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC