Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How do you feel about gerrymandering?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:10 AM
Original message
Poll question: How do you feel about gerrymandering?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. So I take it that this is not a well-liked thing?
Edited on Sat Mar-31-07 11:15 AM by originalpckelly
I may have a solution, I'll post it a little later today after thinking a little more about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Undemocratic BS
Just to be fair, both parties are guilty of doing it, but in the last 20 years the Pukes have been doing the majority of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. One thing that Wisconsin does that I like...
They have 99 Assembly Districts and 33 Senate Districts.

There are 3 Assembly Districts that fit in 1 Senate District. Although they still don't compact the districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. yeah, but the Congressional districts in WI are a big joke
very weird map drawing in some places
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's why I'm stuck with a Republican Congressman.
No matter how offensive or incompetent he is, he will always win re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. There should be more leeway on difference from district to district
The preference appears to be not more than 10%.

I would like to see counties never split up in Congressional Districts. Barring that then it at the least townships should never be split.

In addition, states should strive to have districts that are not more than twice its width.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Several comments
Edited on Sat Mar-31-07 01:06 PM by dsc
We will always be at a disadvantage in the Senate and likely to be at one in the House. The states are gerrymandered in the GOP's favor and we can't do squat about that. In the House, the problem is a bit more subtle. First, we have the minority districts. Each one of those is extremely heavily Democratic and necessitates that the rest of the districts are more Republican. For example, in North Carolina we have two districts that are designed to elect African Americans. That makes the districts around them much more Republican than they normally would be. A lesser problem is that Democrats tend to be consentrated. Places like New York and San Francisco are overwhelmingly Democratic to an extent that pretty much no places are as overwhelmingly Republican. Keeping political units in tact won't be as beneficial as we think. I don't know if perfect parity is worth sacrificing minority districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'd like to see it follow the Wyoming "model"
They have approximately 500k people and ONE rep. ...so for every 500K a state has, they get 1 rep.. That would give CA about 76..

and a computer grid, superimposed over a map would be the fair way to make districts "fair"..Larger cities of course would hvae a grid of streets to go by..and let the chips fall where they may..

Legislators should NOT get to "choose their voters"..for EITHER party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. I really liked him when he played "The Beaver"
Oh wait!

That was Gerry Mathers


The whole process should be illegal

but what are you gonna do about it?

Any real accountability these days is like pulling teeth

(no offense to dentists)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC