Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress Challenges Labor Board Anti-Union Definitions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 03:10 PM
Original message
Congress Challenges Labor Board Anti-Union Definitions
original-new standard


Congress Challenges Labor Board Anti-Union Definitions
by Megan Tady

Mar. 30 – Lawmakers introduced a bill last week that would give back millions of workers the right to join unions.

The bill, called the Re-Empowerment of Skilled and Professional Employees and Construction Tradeworkers (RESPECT) Act, would modify the definition of supervisor in the National Labor Relations Act. The current definition has been the source of major contention between unions and businesses.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which is dominated by President Bush's appointees, reinterpreted the definition of "supervisor" in September, cutting hundreds of thousands of nurses out of the right to join unions. The Board said charge nurses "assign" tasks and have a "responsibility to direct others," and are therefore supervisors under the Act. The progressive research organization Economic Policy Institute estimated that more than a third of all registered nurses nationwide could be affected by a new interpretation.

As previously reported by The NewStandard, worker advocates feared that the new interpretation would thwart anyone who delegates tasks from joining a union.

The Respect Act, however, would effectively reverse the NLRB's ruling by striking the terms "assign" and "responsibility to direct" from the definition of supervisor. The bill would also define a supervisor as anyone who engages in supervisory activities "for a majority of the individual's work time."
~snip~
.
.
.
complete article here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. they should include graduate employees as well
Graduate teaching and research assistants are another segment of the workforce who lost the right to organize under Bush. Those of us at state schools are still protected in some cases, but private schools like NYU were quick to stop negotiating with graduate employees as soon as the Bush NLRB gave them the opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC