Sometimes you wonder just what the far right really does believe (re: torture) & then you find it...

[kpete]

06 Apr 2009 08:50 pm

From The Pro-Torture Cocoon
Sometimes, you wonder just what the far right really does believe. And then you find it:

Torture has been illegal for a number of years, and President Bush insisted just as strongly as Obama that the U.S. does not torture. There was a legitimate debate about waterboarding, which does no physical injury, and which I do not believe constitutes torture. But according to press reports, only two or three top-ranking terrorists were waterboarded, none after 2003. And waterboarding has been banned by the U.S. military since 2006. So what was Obama's purpose in implying that until he came along, his own government was engaged in torturing prisoners? His speech was carried live by Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya, broadcast into countries where "torture" doesn't mean getting your face wet. Obama at least impliedly exaggerated the supposed sins of his predecessors and the "change" brought about by himself. Why? For what purpose? Isn't the campaign over? http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/04/023262.php

This is John Hinderaker, someone who has apparently managed to block out the dozens of reports, including the latest from the Red Cross, in which there is no longer any doubt about the United States' use of torture under the Bush-Cheney administration, against domestic law, international law, and the Geneva Conventions.

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/04/from-the-protorture-cocoon.html#more