Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Giving Obstructionism A Bad Name

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:03 AM
Original message
Giving Obstructionism A Bad Name
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 09:06 AM by babylonsister
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_04/017597.php




GIVING OBSTRUCTIONISM A BAD NAME.... Tammy Duckworth, who lost both of her legs in combat while serving in Iraq, is the head of veterans affairs for the state of Illinois, and President Obama's nominee for assistant secretary of veterans affairs. Duckworth had a nominating hearing on Wednesday, a vote was scheduled for Thursday, and a swearing-in event for Friday.

All of that has been pushed off, however, because the top Republican on the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs wants to feel important.

Republican Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina is delaying the nomination vote and swearing-in of injured Iraq veteran Tammy Duckworth for a top post in the Veterans Affairs administration.

His actions angered some veterans groups Friday.

"Senator Burr has had plenty of time to ask questions of her," Jon Soltz, the chairman of VoteVets.org, an organization of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, said in a statement. "Senator Burr is only hurting American veterans with this nonsense. He should stop playing petty partisan games, stop needling the White House for the sheer fun of it and grow up."

Burr still has questions about Duckworth's nomination, his office said.


What kind of questions? Burr's office wouldn't say.

This is hardly isolated. As Ryan Powers explained this morning, "Conservatives in Congress and in the media are attempting to block or delay a growing number of critical nominees for what amount to ideological witch hunts and self-interested horse-trading. As the President attempts to deal with the significant legal and logistical questions surrounding two wars, closing Guantanamo Bay, and caring for our nation's veterans, the people Obama has picked to assist him with such issues are being forced to wait in the wings."

In some cases, these are positions that hardly need Senate confirmation in the first place. In all the cases, we're talking about qualified nominees, ready to fill important posts, and who already have more than enough votes secured to win confirmation.

Burr and a few too many of his Republican colleagues are blocking and delaying good people simply because they can. It's more than a little frustrating to watch.

-Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why do republicons HATE our honorable US veterans?
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 09:12 AM by SpiralHawk
I've always suspected that it's because so many of the republicon 'leaders' are ashamed of being Chickenhawks: George AWOL Bush, Five Deferments Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum.

Out of their Republicon Chickenhawk shame, they mistreat our sons and daughters in uniform, and our veterans who actually served America honorably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So much for their "Support the Troops."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That slogan has always been a Republicon spin mindf*ck
with no basis in the reality of their actions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think you've answered your own question correctly.
They resent our veterans for exactly the reason you stated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC