Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much plutonium is missing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 08:58 PM
Original message
How much plutonium is missing?
Edited on Thu Mar-26-09 09:02 PM by ColbertWatcher
From the Los Angeles Times
Los Alamos' security flaws exposed
An Energy Department investigation into a plutonium mix-up reveals deficiencies that the New Mexico nuclear weapons lab must address, an official says.
By Ralph Vartabedian
March 26, 2009
An Energy Department investigation has alleviated fears that a significant amount of plutonium was missing from a national laboratory, but it has also heightened concerns about flaws in the system for controlling the U.S. stockpile of weapons materials.

The investigation began in February, shortly after a routine inventory at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico found a plutonium shortage estimated at 2.2 pounds, setting off a frantic national effort to determine what happened to the material.

The confidential investigation concluded this week that statisticians at the lab had miscalculated the amount of plutonium at its facility and that none was actually missing.

Although the finding eliminates the worst-case scenario -- that the material left the facility and ended up in rogue hands -- it raises doubts about the lab's management at a time of growing concern about nuclear terrorism.

(more...)

--Los Angeles Times


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. How much did Cheney's secret cabal take?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. According to the article, it seems Arthur Anderson is doing the math ...
... at first they thought 2.2 pounds was missing, but then they realized they didn't count/weight the inventory correctly.

Or, if not Arthur Anderson, maybe Lehman Brothers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would take the possibility of
a staged domestic attack very seriously. This is all the Republicans need to regain power, and they know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would tend to believe that the material is really missing rather than a CYA report like this...
It is one thing to 'lose' an item of value, but quite another to make a miscalculation of the amount of plutonium in your possession.

It is not like someone used a pencil and wrote down a number wrong, or moved a decimal point.
This material is under constant surveillance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm just surprised that an investigation began in February.
Obama didn't wait for anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. k&r . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC