Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Jim Cramer deserved MORE than Jon Stewart gave him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 02:32 PM
Original message
Why Jim Cramer deserved MORE than Jon Stewart gave him
http://www.deepcapture.com/category/1-the-players/



....In 1988, Karen joined Cramer & Company. The fund performed well at first, and Jim and Karen married. In 1990 she became pregnant but kept working. In 1992, Cramer & Co. hired Jeff Berkowitz from Columbia Business School. Cramer described their evolving business model succinctly:

“We had it down to a science in 1992: my wife would pick stocks that technically looked ready to go up, or she would keep track of merchandise to see what was down to tag ends. She would then generate a list of stocks that could move quickly on good news. Jeff would then go to work calling the companies to try to find anything good we could say about them. I would call the analysts to see I they were hearing anything. When we found a stock that looked ready technically to break out, or where the supply had been mopped up, and Jeff found something positive at the company, and I knew the analyst community didn’t know anything positive, we would load up with call options and common stock and then give the good news to our favorite analysts who liked the stock so they could go do their promotion. That would get the buzz going and we would then be able to liquidate the position into the buzz for a handsome profit.” (Confessions of a Street Addict, page 61).

In his pride at mastering “down to a science” the art of manipulating public interest, Jim left unstated how he felt about the public that, once its interest had been so stimulated, found itself on the other side of the trades from which Jim was profiting. In fact, Jim seems to have a tin-ear for his own words, because, as I said earlier, what he describes above would have seemed patently illegal to Wall Street folks of a generation ago, for the reasons I described at the outset of this piece.


Years later, in a venue he apparently did not anticipate would become public, Jim described how he really felt about those compliant analysts and reporters he manipulated artfully and with such apparent ease.... Jim Cramer displays his comfort with stock manipulation in ways that he claims no no one else will admit, but which are illegal and beyond the capacity of the SEC to grasp, as he sees it. Also throughout it Jim displays his thorough comfort at fleecing the rubes (that is, cheating other market participants by manipulating stocks): in fact, the video is an exercise in Jim’s pride in that direction.


http://antisocialmedia.net/?page_id=87

http://antisocialmedia.net/?page_id=61


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for more Smear on Cramer. Also
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 02:42 PM by truedelphi
I noticed that he really went after Bear Stearns on the Jon Stewart interview.

Bear Stearns wa smore a vicitm than anything else. It was in business one day, and than after rumors about it hit the Wall Street rumor mill, it was dead meat, waiting for Goldman Sachs to buy it up at a whopping $ 2 a share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How are his own words "a smear"?
I find it funny that you consider someone's own personal confession of wrongdoing a smear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Okay okay I apologize. I love words too, and sorry for using the wrong word.
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 02:55 PM by truedelphi
The exposure of Cramer.

Or please offer any other words you'd like me to use.

I will consign "smear" to my bagel, cream cheese and jelly from now on. I promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. I personally believe that
Cramer was so scared on Stewart's show b/c he was afraid that Stewart was setting him up for a 'gotcha(s)' which Cramer had perpetrated which is/are so heinous in nature that he'd be indicted the next afternoon by some sitting Federal Grand Jury. When it became apparent that this wasn't going to happen, Cramer let go with that manic "I'll try to do better" horseshit.

Relief...pure, unadulterated relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's an interesting take
I guess Stewart could have done a lot worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where was all this criticism of Cramer during the years he was bashing Bush?
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 08:30 PM by AZ Criminal JD
Dead silence from you during that period. Shouldn't you have exposed him then? So we wouldn't be taken in by such a monster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Stand Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. I believe they call this Pump and Dump
They also call it sleazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC