Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elliot Spitzer - Head of the Securities Exchange Commission..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:28 PM
Original message
Elliot Spitzer - Head of the Securities Exchange Commission..
Just watching him on Fareed's show on CNN, the guy still has a lot to offer in public service. His experience would be of great value in over-seeing the stock market and regulating the greedy manipulators on Wall Street. I would like to see him considered for this position. He would be an asset for the Obama Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yea I just watched him
He's a smart guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would be thrilled
by that appointment!! to much to hope for though.................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good idea
Excellent interview. Spitzer will command the news this week despite the nasty job done on him by Bush's Justice Department.

I can't wait for Vitter, Craig or any Rushican to comment.
Welcome back Eliot Spitzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bwa ha ha ha ha!!!
That would be hilarious! Just to see the disbelief on the faces of all the Santellis on Wall Street.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd love to see it, but some of the puritains on this board might have a problem
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 12:39 PM by Taverner
HE SLEPT WITH A HOO-HOO-HOOKER!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Maybe it's time to stand up to the puritans! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. It's not that he fucked a hooker
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 04:42 PM by Sebastian Doyle
It's that he didn't realize it was a goddamn setup. Not to mention the price she was charging. Wasn't it like $5000/hour or something like that?

I've seen this chick. No way in Hell she was worth that price.

That alone calls Spitzer's judgment into question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Do not question a human and their sexual organ
Unless you have said sexual organ attached to your body, you cannot judge... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. He knows a lot about people screwing their clients for money, so he'd be the best candidate.
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 12:40 PM by originalpckelly
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Are you kidding? 75% of this hypocritical country would be too damn busy
monitoring his crotch to pay attention to any of the good he might accomplish, including putting an end to all this criminal activity by Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. He would not be running for office. People would like him better than they
Geithner. (I realize he would not be replacing Geithner. I'm just using Geithner as an example.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Yeah, this is an area that I think is perfectly suited for Spitzer. And maybe
people could/would be sensible and just figure that he's the right man for the job. But I don't have that much faith in the people. I am certain that they would allow certain segments make Spitzer's personal pecadillos a source of constant uproar and diversion and that's all anyone would hear about.

But he would be a welcome change to Geithner & Patterson & Bernanke & Paulson and the rest of the Wall Street Boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. And let us watch Krugman's head explode if that were to happen...LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. He'd have to go in the back door...
and avoid any confirmation hearings. The public would chew him up, and spit him out, on the cue of the media. I bet that's the reason many don't want to work in any official capacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. "on the cue of the media" kinda says it all.
David Vitter is a respected Republicon senator once again, thanks in large part to his treatment by the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. No.
Yes he's smart. Yes he was a gifted politican. But Obama does not need to associate himself with someone with that kind of baggage. That is all the media and the right-wing would focus on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes.
That would be guts and a smart move. Spitzer is the one who blew the cover on Bush blocking all 50 governors from taking action on this long before it blew up. If the RW complains, that's all that needs saying.

They wouldn't dare. And if they did, they'd be toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Only if you want to see 24 hour news coverage of his sex life again.
And RW talking heads flinging mud for days, months & years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. If anyone of the RW talking heads took that route
Dem talking heads would just mention Vitter and Craig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Won't happen, he screwed himself by screwing a fancy French "escort".
He knew that the forces of Wall street would use any means to bring him down yet he went ahead and gave them skeletons to find. Same with John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Won't happen. Not now. But I think you can bet on it
that Spitzer will be in the 2nd Obama administration.

It's just not politically wise to do it now, whether we like it or not, that is the reality.

But, rest assured, if our President is re-elected I think we can count on seeing Spitzer included somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. Since Dems are in power and Dems do not care about sex scandals, I say do it.
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 05:00 PM by McCamy Taylor
Here is the story about all the bankers who used their corporate credit cards to pay prostitutes.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Wall_Street_CEOs_investment_bankers_charged_0206.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I'm down...when the people he put in jail for prostitution get out
I really don't care whether he hires hookers or not, that's between him and his family. But I do care about the fact that he made political capital out of busting vice rings and used his public position to condemn the same service he liked to spend his personal money on. Makes me wonder why some people got busted and others didn't. I don't like the hypocrisy, and think it verges on corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Funny that...bringing up prostitution ..
as 'corruption' while talking about global corporations that defraud the American people of billions, and billions of dollars. I guess if he'd been caught driving drunk, and you would feel the same way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Tell it to the people he put away for selling a service he liked to buy.
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 11:44 PM by anigbrowl
Maybe you don't remember he busted a 'vice ring' in operating out of Staten Island in 2004 and made a big deal out of how immoral it was. The possibility of corruption I refer to is not prostitution itself, but whether the operations he patronized were spared his scrutiny as DA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. It would be hard for me to forget that...
as it was used to take him down. I see it as hypocritical. I guess corruption is in the eye of the beholder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Hypocrisy + legal power = corruption
Talking about it is one thing, prosecuting some people while giving others a pass (because you do business with them) is quite another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. He's tainted
he screwed himself and ruined his reputation and career, Obama doesn't need an anchor like that hung around his neck. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Spitzer is a hypocrite with questionable ethics. Besides, the new SEC chairman was just confirmed.
And Mary Schapiro was an excellent choice. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. He'd never be confirmed
Edited on Sun Mar-22-09 08:37 PM by SoCalDem
he's been naughty:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. K & R, but he pooped his nest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC