|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:17 PM Original message |
Frank Rich: Has Obama's Katrina Moment Arrived ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. Frank Rich is stupid if he is critical of the administration's decisions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. What I want to know is: who the f*ck is "Frank Rich" and why should I care? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camera obscura (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:44 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. If you've never heard of Rich, that's your problem, not his. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:55 PM Response to Reply #37 |
55. You think Americans don't need editorialists? That things should just go uncommented upon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:14 AM Response to Reply #37 |
65. You don't read much, do you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NavyDavy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cash_thatswhatiwant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
3. oh please. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cash_thatswhatiwant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. ok, i admit i didnt read it all. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. hahahah! DRAMARAMA!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hah! Thank you Frank! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. maybe you'd have some credibility if you didn't use schoolyard name-calling like "The Chicago Boy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
43. The Chicago Boys refers to a group of economists.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Bottom line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 07:59 AM Response to Reply #21 |
60. well said malaise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:22 AM Response to Reply #21 |
66. well met my friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. Frank Rich Is The Greatest Editorialist Of Our Time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Please, come with me. Empty your pockets. Follow the others. 3rd door on the right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. I Don't Get The Reference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. I Have Been Perplexed By The Choice Of Those Two Men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
7. PUMA!1!!!! PUMA!1!!!!!11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM Martin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Rich was an early backer of Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
50. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. How about correctly quoting the title of the article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Pfft. Just plain lying is SOOOOO much better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. It's easier to take liberties with the facts in order to attract attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Of course it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Get A Grip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Wow. That's just sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Yawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Frank Rich did not say what you claim in your OP's title. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Way to avoid actually addressing the content -- nitpick about the subject line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. "Too fucking easy" for what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Too fucking easy to see your obvious avoidance of addressing the content of the piece. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. There are other threads in other forums that address the topic honestly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Gawd, you're really hung up on this. What damn difference does it make if the title isn't exact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Why should posters address the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:47 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. You'd think they'd have the decency to be embarrassed when they're called out on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:00 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. What was the original title of this OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:24 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. If you only knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:29 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. OMG. You're just never going to let go of it, are you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Do you remember what the OP was before the edit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #53 |
73. Why actually make a point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Gee I Wonder Why Rich Used That Quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:31 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. BTW, you're still not correctly quoting the title of the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Please Note The Absence Of Quotation Marks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:02 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. : |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
47. Are you kidding with this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Did you see what was orignally posted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
15. Good article-- I'm inclined to agree with his position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. k & fucking r. Obama needs to dump the neoliberals and Wall Streeters and fast. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. AMEN TO THAT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Exactly. Actions speak louder than words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
35. Well Said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jbnow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
25. I hate his column because it's true. I was okay with the appointments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #25 |
63. your post echoes my sentiments. If Obama is losing me on the Economy, it's a bad sign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
31. Does anyone have a problem with these comments? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
51. All of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
46. Rich is spot on.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-21-09 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
54. Frank Rich was one of Obama's biggest supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
57. Great piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
58. It's a strange analogy, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 01:24 AM Response to Original message |
59. Except that polls consistently show Americans understand it's a long process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 08:16 AM Response to Reply #59 |
62. That is a VAST simplification... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 09:13 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. You're watching too much Joe Scarborough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 10:11 AM Response to Reply #64 |
67. I've never watched or listened to.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
61. the best piece yet on obama's lack of action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
68. K & R for TRUTH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
69. Rich has promoted Obama 24/7...but Obama's team is showing true arrogance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
70. People who can't accept ANY criticism of Obama are just like the Bushies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dem629 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Well said. Exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-22-09 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
72. add to that the comments of Biden's Economic rep today on This Week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC