|
I think that once we rationalize banning one or two things, it becomes all too easy to find rationalizations for banning just about everything. Take PCP, for example. It makes people insane. However, LSD can also make people insane if they take an enormous dose and have a really, REALLY "bad trip." I've witnessed such a thing happening: we had to physically restrain a high school friend from trying to jump from the rooftop-deck of his house into their backyard pool while using LSD.
However...that kind of overblown, crazy reaction is not universal. It doesn't happen to everyone--not to all PCP users, and certainly not to all LSD users. So where do we draw the line? Where do we say, "THIS substance is okay, but THAT one is not." Because our experiences are all different, we all have our own ideas about which drugs are worst and why.
My thoughts are that it's not so much the drugs themselves that are the problem. It's the uncertain dosage (because they're not being manufactured safely,) the additives and cutting agents, and the fear of legal consequences for seeking medical help early that combine to cause most of the worst episodes. If we legalize, then people will always know exactly what their dose is, they'll know that it hasn't been cut with poison, and they won't be afraid to go to the ER if they start tripping out badly. They'll also be more likely to seek rehab and therapy for addiction, because they aren't going to be afraid of arrest.
Moreover, I'm afraid that if we keep just a few drugs illegal, then the illegal drug crime subculture will simply shift to pushing THOSE drugs exclusively (to protect their profits,) and we'll see an *increase* in people using stuff like PCP and meth--which is the absolute last thing that we want to happen. Drug pushers are very good at what they do. If the only things left to push for profit are PCP and meth, then the use of drugs like those is going to go through the roof.
What do you think?
|