Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army says regular troops patrolled Samson, Alabama -- inquiry under way

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 03:42 AM
Original message
Army says regular troops patrolled Samson, Alabama -- inquiry under way
In response to inquiries about photos that seemed to record the presence of regular Army troops on the streets of Samson, Alabama, the U.S. Army has released a statement acknowledging that military police were in fact dispatched to the city after the mass murder there, and that an inquiry into the use of those troops is under way.

On the Tenth of March, after a report of the apparent mass murder in Samson, 22 military police soldiers from Fort Rucker, along with the Fort Rucker Provost Martial, were sent to the city of Samson.

The purpose for sending the military police, the authority for doing so, and what duties they performed, is the subject of an ongoing commander's inquiry, directed by the commanding general of the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, General Martin Dempsey.

In addition to determining the facts, this inquiry will also consider whether law, regulation and policy were followed. Until those facts are determined, it would be inappropriate to speculate or comment further.

In the aftermath of this horrific crime spree, the military community of Fort Rucker joins the greater Alabama Wiregrass community in its grief and concern for the victims and their families.

http://www.examiner.com/x-536-Civil-Liberties-Examiner~y2009m3d17-Army-acknowledges-concerns-about-regular-troops-patrolling-Samson-Alabama

Wonder what they will find??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a job for law enforcement, not the military.

This whole war-on-terra strategy is terrifying.

Where is that change we are all hoping for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're reading it. There's an investigation on already.
That never happened under the torture president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yeah, right. The commander is investigating himself. WTF?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Well, let's see how he does. I don't have free passes for anyone
in my pocket but submit, this is already a change. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I don't think it's the base commander investigating himself - it's a higher
ranking general from another command looking into it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. If they keep doing this, eventually people will get used to seeing troops on American streets.
Eventually, people will grow to accept the idea if it is done enough times to be a routine occurrence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not if the people learn that they are in their right to resist them.
Edited on Wed Mar-18-09 05:38 AM by BuyingThyme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Isn't that the plan?
Most of the fears I've been following on DU have been justified. If they could have pulled it off, Bushco would have lined up with the military and prevented elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. man, sure didn't take long after they passed that law
guess they'll be using those detainment camps soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. I suspect that local government asked for help
and the military obliged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Why would the local government need the military?
That doesn't make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Every military installation has emergency assistance agreements with neighboring towns
it is very common to provide fire, medical and search and rescue help when asked. I don't know what the soldiers were asked to do but there are many things they could possibly be asked to do that don't cross any legal boundaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Isn't deploying the military for domestic law enforcement prohibited?
Wouldn't something like this be the appropriate response to some kind of armed insurrection or to a declaration of martial law? I think that this is a brand new use of the armed forces, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Isn't that the question at hand here?
we don't know what they were asked to do. One account I read said they were there for traffic control and to help secure the very large crime scene. I don't know if that violates Posse Comitatus or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Many small towns that surround military bases ask for assistance in emergencies.
I've seen the military used many times during natural disasters. Usually not in a law enforcement role, sometimes though, Hurricane Katrina comes to mind.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. What year did this happen?
Just curious. I looked at the article and it didn't say (that I saw)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. About a week ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Just getting back from a vacation on the moon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgrezivIndie Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. "what year did this happen?"

see: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,509188,00.html
(apologies for the FAUX NEWS link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Martial Law, alive and well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. When the fighter crashed in SD Fire Units from Miramar
responded under Mutual Aid... that one made sense and violated zero regulations (they are the closest with foam... and they have also responded to accidents at fields) There was no MP on the street, and the fire crews wore standard fire gear... OTOH civilian crews have entered the bases to fight fires, that mutual thing again

They had some Marines AFTER the cops secured the place, doing what they do, with the FAA

That is a world of difference from having MPs doing law enforcement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. MP's do patrol towns near the base to handle any incidents involving
soldiers or sailors. Was there any military personnel involved as victims or perps in the mass murder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Camel's nose under the tent
I can see helping with a naturtal disaster but not law and order. That's kissing the devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. They've been doing that for many decades. I drove an ambulance for a
time while in the Army. When I went out on a call, MP's came along. Most likely it was to pick up a drunk NCO. Usually they are at a brothel, completely nude, passed out on the lawn. No need for anything other than help getting their fat asses into the ambulance, and to keep their wives from killing them.

The MP's do not concern themselves with civilians, just service members. Their job is to make sure the GI's don't destroy private property, hurt others or themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
22. In this case I'll chalk it up to a mistake.
Should there be MP's in the street.
No.

Was it done to establish a precedent for American military on the streets.
I don't think so. I think somebody wanted to help and either forgot or said screw regs.

Saying screw regs would be worse, but he'll likely cop to forgetting and getting off with a slap on the wrist.

But at least we're HAVING an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC