Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oops Caught in the CITI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:47 AM
Original message
Oops Caught in the CITI
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/16/pandit-1-payment-is-more_n_175397.html
<snip>
Citigroup Chief Executive Vikram Pandit received nearly $11 million of compensation in 2008.

A month earlier, he testified to Congress that his compensation for 2008 was just $1 million.

"My compensation for the year 2008 was my salary, which was $1 million," he told the House Committee on Financial Services on February 11, failing to mention his sign-on and retention awards, as well as stock and option awards.

At the same hearing, Pandit pledged to accept a salary of just $1 a year and no bonus until Citibank once again posted a profit.

The $10.82 million in total compensation for 2008 consisted of $7.73 million in sign-on and retention awards, a $958,333 salary, $9.84 million of stock and option awards and $16,193 of other compensation.
---
EPIC Fail Vikram Pandit. Liars must have good memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. All the attention is on AIG. Here is an outright lie to Congress.
and nothing will be done. All the subpoenas are AIG's. They will subpoena, and subpoena and write letters back and forth and nothing more.

Thanks for posting. I tried to post last night but didn't get much attention.

K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i guess the media thinks people can only be outraged at one thing at a time.
you know, isn't there some thing about lying to congress?? I wonder why no one seems too concerned about what will happen if they lie to congress. I mean, there is nothing to tell them that they will be in big trouble.... like people getting arrested or anything for lying. It really makes me sick to see the congress not doing what it needs to do to ensure that people are taking them seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. did he lie under oath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Haven't been able to find out about that yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC