Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At the end, Will Ferrel says that they initiated illegal wiretaps "months before 9/11."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:30 AM
Original message
At the end, Will Ferrel says that they initiated illegal wiretaps "months before 9/11."
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 01:07 AM by BuyingThyme
Once again the comedian is informing the people far better than the "news" media or the government.

Why do you suppose they did that? Why before 9/11?

Thanks Will!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gathering dirt on any opposition?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why? They had to cover up a stolen election! D'OH!!!! Remember, they know they
were guilty! And, they act accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Funny thing though. They say the wiretapping was initiated
in the interest of monitoring terrorist activities.

If that's the case, it's difficult to understand why they weren't able to prevent the 9/11 attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Your mistake is that you expect them to use deductive cyclical reasoning and this
is GWB who.. well, he's the one that put firecrackers in frog's mouths. So, you see your folly here.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lots of hits in google, so I'll go with TP from Oct 07:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/13/warrantless-wiretapping-in-place-before-911/

Warrantless wiretapping in place before 9/11.

Today, the Washington Post publishes additional details about the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping, noting that the National Security Agency approached Qwest “more than six months before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.” But the Body Politik’s Igor Volsky points out that President Bush has claimed that the program was put in place in response to 9/11:

After September the 11th, I vowed to the American people that our government would do everything within the law to protect them against another terrorist attack. As part of this effort, I authorized the National Security Agency to intercept the international communications of people with known links to al Qaeda and related terrorist organizations. <5/11/06>

Kagro X adds, “If Qwest’s competitors were already abetting this bloodless(?) coup before 9/11, then the ‘administration’s’ domestic spying not only has little if anything to do with response to terrorism, but it also objectively failed to prevent 9/11.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That lousy journalist,
JL, how "dare" you?

I'm kidding, who cares. But no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That was actually me, BT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Are you Leopold? Whoa! OK then. It's a bit late, but I'll spread that around! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, I'm BT, not JL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. well, coming from will ferrel...
i absolutely believe it...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC