Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans Make a Case for Prosecuting Bush Officials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:28 PM
Original message
Republicans Make a Case for Prosecuting Bush Officials
Republicans Make a Case for Prosecuting Bush Officials
By Daphne Eviatar 3/4/09 1:26 PM


The Senate Judiciary Committee’s “Getting to the Truth Through a Nonpartisan Commission of Inquiry” convened this morning to consider Sen. Patrick Leahy’s (D-Vt.) proposal for a sort of “truth and reconciliation” commission.

The hearing was full of all the predictable, lofty statements from illustrious supporters about why a commission would further the American people’s understanding of our nation’s past and true values, and also demonstrate to the world our commitment to truth and justice — most of which I agree with. But what was most surprising was that the Senate Republicans and their witnesses, in the process of ripping apart the idea, made the strongest case I’ve heard yet for why the Department of Justice should prosecute former senior officials of the Bush administration.

Sen. Arlen Specter, the ranking committee Republican, after noting his previous support for judicial review of the Bush administration’s terrorist surveillance program, referred to the recent disclosures of Office of Legal Counsel memos as potentially supporting the case for prosecutions.

“You’ve had some rather startling disclosures, with the publicity in recent days about unusual—to put it mildly—legal opinions” to justify broad executive actions, including homicide. “They’re all being exposed now,” he said, and noted that a forthcoming report from the Office of Professional Responsibility in the Justice Department will likely expose even more. They’re “starting to tread on what may disclose criminal conduct,” he said.

Rather than going off “helter-skelter” and conducting a “fishing expedition,” said Specter, “it seems to me that we ought to follow a regular order here … If there’s reason to believe that these justice department officials have given approval for things that they know not to be lawful and sound, go after them.”

The witnesses called to present the Republican opposition to Leahy’s proposal made the same point.

more...

http://washingtonindependent.com/32406/republicans-make-a-case-for-prosecuting-bush-officials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does.Not.Compute.
The GOP WANTS to investigate BushCo? Does Arlen have another Magic Bullet stashed somewhere to divert the trail away from the Cabal?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yep. Rachel Maddow was all over this tonight. She interviewed
Sen. Leahy, and he's less than enthusiastic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Remember the whole US Attorney's scandal, the career people...
at the DOJ were unduly influenced by the political appointees there. They've already fixed the game so that when it gets put to the DOJ, they'll come back with nothing. Get it? Pretty crafty little devils.

Even under Obama, it's not like they're all going to be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. The old limited, modified, partial hangout ploy.
Let's do a cursory investigation of all the stuff that we can't hide, but let's not go looking for anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Leahy wants a commission, they want prosecution?
Whatever they do will take time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Sure. Hang a couple small fry & move on.
Or to put it another way, Screw Yoo. (PLEASE don't take that personally!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Haha! I won't. But Yoo could be very valuable. I want this whole
ball of string/lies to unravel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Specter will always do whatever it takes for HIM to control the investigations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Classic Specter move--Beware!
He will criticize the Bushies and their terrible behavior as if he were in favor of prosecution. Then at the last minute, he will back down in a way that scuttles the whole investigation. It's a total ploy whose result will be to sink any legitimate investigation and prosecution. Mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Either that or full miscalculation
this is quite possibly one of those, careful what you wish for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. You've sen this movie before, too? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Careful what you wish for folks
careful what you wish for

The truth and recon commission was a nice way to push all under the rug

Did Specter just royally miscalculate? Or did he develop a conscience? Possible, he is a moderate, not a radical...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. He's not a radical, unless that means rethug. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Let's clarify, he's not, but rush is
kantor is

Specter is right, the rest are radical right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. they want to prosecute..
the low hanging fruit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Precisely.
And look no further up the tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. The same Arlen Specter who sold the magic bullet ...
to the Warren Commission?

He must be dying to let the Democrats have their Truth Commission. But who will be the mole? Jerry Ford isn't available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Arlen Spector, the Truth Fairy.
You take your truth and put it under your pillow, and he comes in the night and replaces it with a magic bullet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC