Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Cheney have the big one running over to the Senate to be the tie breaking vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:41 PM
Original message
Did Cheney have the big one running over to the Senate to be the tie breaking vote?
I heard he was rushing over and thats the last I heard.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. he he he he he..wasted effort
poor baby didn't get to vote and be Jr's hero again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. doesnt he "ONLY" get to vote in the event of a tie
or does he have the ability to vote anytime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think only in the event of a tie. But it couldn't be a tie, because
Sen. Johnson isn't there. Maybe he was hoping someone would be absent... I hope he pulled a vein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Only in the event of a tie.
That's actually just about the only thing the Constitution
gives a VP the power to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. The leg probably slowed him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. His services will not be required today..
The MINORITY party FAILED to get enough votes for a tie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. :woohoo:
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flarney Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder why the Repubs let it come to a vote...(60 votes for cloture) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Because then they could hear all through 2007 about how the Republican Party
closed off any debate about the Iraq War in the Senate, in the news, in campaign ads.

After their initial stonewalling on this they apparently have seen some polling that shows this is disaster for their party, so they've changed tack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Because they'd be the fall guy for not getting the bill passed.
The Democrats would have a field day pointing out that the Republicans are holding up money to keep the troops in Iraq funded. Remember the "up or down" vote from the last Congress? They had a losing hand here and they had to get this legislation passed. Reid, to his credit, gave them the chance to vote the amendment to strike the time limitation clause in order to move the bill along. Republics lost...now the Decider can decide if he wants to support the troops or throw a tantrum on getting his wings clipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hope not.
I'm still hoping to see him stand trial at the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'd be surprised if he wasn't
If I were him, I would have been there since this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. NO, but the scores of SS officers that had to haul his evil ass....
probably did....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC