Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How does an insurance company lose $62 billion?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:11 PM
Original message
How does an insurance company lose $62 billion?
Are people defaulting on their payments? Are they insuring things that have no value? I don't understand how companies can be so mismanaged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Euphemism
Transferring cash to offshore secret accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. holy shit that's what i was thinking!!!!!!
who's to say that those 25 or so asshats that are suing UBS to keep their identities secret (the fuckers with the tax evading bank accounts) aren't comprised of a few insurance industry giants...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know, but AIG needs new management, and fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think they are deeply invested in 401K's and retirement accounts?
And they are trying to save people's retirements. It is probably postponing the inevitable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nbsmom Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. They got sucked into the derivatives
Which is doubly odd, since they had been (and for all I know, continue to be) a rather successful insurance company. The insurance side of the company didn't create the problem. Apparently, however, someone in another business unit thought they had a really BIG idea that would make even more money than those old insurance policies and annuity products.

But yes, if AIG is allowed to fail, then a bunch of people's insurance policies and public and private pensions are suddenly not so healthy. I also remember reading something about AIG and CIA having some sort of connection elsewhere in this forum...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. You really think they give a flying fuck about people's retirements?
Sad.
So sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tangent90 Donating Member (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Creative use of commas and decimal points.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remedy1 Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. They invest in and insure derivatives...
that they don't understand.

You haven't even seen the tip of the derivative disaster iceberg yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's my understandng they were insuring these huge, complicated
financial transactions like the huge bundles of mortgages, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Man. Sometimes I think we should go back to using the abacus
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 12:26 PM by Uzybone
If one has to insure a financial transaction; isn't that a hint that the transaction is a bad idea?

Basically we have a huge sector of our economy that is a house of cards.

I know I'm being very simplistic but this news is stunning to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. gambling and scamming n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Credit default swaps
It is like insurance on bonds.

See all those foreclosed houses? Their mortgages were bundled up and sold as a security - a bond that was to pay x% interest over 30 years, then pay the principle. If there is not a large enough cash-flow from the bonds coming in they are in default.

So AIG sold these credit default swaps to investors (states, pension funds, any person who bought mortgage based investment bonds). They are coming due.

AIG never saw the systemic risk - they did not think many mortgages would default. They priced their insurance too low. So they are on the hook for a large percentage of the mortgage bonds defaulting.

IN OTHER WORDS, we, the American taxpayer, is subsidizing the bad insurance decisions of bondholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. AIG's life insurance business (American Life) and car insurance are OK. It's all of the hundreds of
other things they do/did that's gotten them in trouble. I think I read that they were heavy into CDSs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. NO! They didn't lose anything. It's all our fault. Damn poor people and their housing needs.
Don't you listen to AM radio?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. 30 billion more for equity stakes, eh? Does that mean the U.S. taxpayer will own Stowe?
Could we please reduce the price of a freakin' lift ticket? It's now $89 for a weekend ticket. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. I spent more then 10 years at Nationwide
It does not come from insurance claims, they always make money there. Nationwide Auto is a monster cash cow. Money is lost through bad investments. Nationwide lost boatloads of money to mortgages and other investments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. They have choked on derivatives and credit default swaps
they must have had a real load of CDSs they had to pay the lump sum claims on and stacks of derivatives they held themselves that are now collectively under water.

Basically their greed led them to bet the farm on the whole mess not tanking... and they were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. It was a London unit unrelated to...
their core insurance business that put them in the hole. There was a presumption in that office that either they would never have to pay a claim on the invisible mortgage insurance business, or that everyone involved with the underwriting would be long gone before the shit hit the fan. I'm not sure why AIG management let it go on without putting the breaks on it, but perhaps they never knew just how flaky the business was.

It's not the first time a rogue trader with a bright idea brought down a huge financial company-- used to be things like cocoa futures or currency trading but now there's all sorts of fun things people understand even less but can lose vastly more money.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
discount moralist Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. London Unit
And the sad thing is it isn't even considered fraud because it's an unregulated market...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. It is not the personal insurance side of AIG that is in trouble.
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 01:25 PM by Marrah_G
The personal insurance side is profitable and stable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC