Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kathleen Parker : "Jindal is the intellectual equivalent of a nuclear power plant"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:55 PM
Original message
Kathleen Parker : "Jindal is the intellectual equivalent of a nuclear power plant"
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-parker_02edi.State.Edition1.2936b3e.html

I liked the old Bobby Jindal better – the one whose brain moves so fast, he's already indexing questions his interviewers haven't thought of yet.

(snip)

The real Jindal is the intellectual equivalent of a nuclear power plant. The real Jindal has actually read the stimulus bill and can recite its contents. The real Jindal is the sort of politician who promises ethics and education reform, and actually delivers.

(snip)
In fact, Jindal did not write his own speech, and he's on a choke collar by some well-meaning people who helped him win the governor's race. What worked in Louisiana in 2007 may not work on the national stage in 2016, when Jindal is most likely to run for president.

(snip)

It's a shame that Tuesday was Jindal's first introduction to many Americans, who won't have a clear picture of the man. It's also a shame that he and Obama aren't on the same team. Although they differ strenuously on social issues and the role government should play in problem-solving, they are temperamentally similar. Most important, both are pragmatists who promise to seek solutions that work, rather than be bound by ideology. It would be heartening to watch these two serious thinkers craft real bipartisan solutions to our economic troubles. One can fantasize.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftyclimber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Three Mile Island, maybe. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was surprised to read that he was a Rhodes Scholar
He probably is smart, but not smart enough to realize that he's being handled by morans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. Me too! Are You Certain He Wasn't a Roads Scholar?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
42. He was a Rhodes scholar?
I didn't know that, he most definitely isn't as smart as Rachel Maddow or Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. She didn't say WHICH nuclear plant...
I think it's this one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, sure, it's not Jindal's fault, it's how he's being handled.
Palin tried that excuse, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. I was going to say that
where have we heard that one before? hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. But he wasn't smart enough to figure out that he sounded like a total fucking moron?
Does. Not. Compute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Chernobyl. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Man Is Voluntarily a Member of the GOP
He's obviously had a lobotomy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. Not only that - but an extremely right-wing
radical member of said GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. And just as radioactive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ya know, I just watched the 60 Minutes segment about him.
I have to say, that while I find him very impressive in some aspects...how the FUCK does someone as smart and educated as he is advocate the teaching of so-called "intelligent design"? I mean, I really want to know what transpired in his personal development to make a young man who was accepted at Harvard Medical School fall for that claptrap. And until someone can explain that to me, I just can't take him seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. yes, how does a rhodes scholar reject evolution and embrace 'intelligent design'
great question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
39. I doubt he believes ID, I suspect he just...
professes belief in it to please the ignorant fundy wing of the GOP. Which would make him worse -- a dishonest cynic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. That's Why He's Scary
If we figured he wasn't too bright and then he started talking about how he doesn't believe in science, we could just shrug and attribute it to his not being too bright. But, when you know some one is a Rhodes Scholar and was accepted to Harvard Medical School less than average intelligence is not a valid explanation. Governor Jindal is very smart, possibly a genius. That is scary on two levels

1) By advocating intelligent design, he is placing his faith above judgment based on reason and science. We have no reason to believe he won't govern differently.

2) He's smart, he can get things done. Bobby Jindal is anti-choice, anti-gay rights (supports writing discrimination into our Constitution) and takes a hard view of drug use. He's for more offshore drilling of oil. Basically, he's with the Conservatives on most if not all of the major issues and he's smarter than the average elephant.

I wouldn't underestimate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonycinla Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. The answer is............
He wanted to be in power in Louisana one of the most conservative states.It alone wouldn't keep him from being elected president.It's called politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. no, it's called no principle....change your ideals to get elected...we've had enough of that shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Political opportunism. He doesn't really believe it IMNSHO
the guy knows who his audience is and he's playing to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Yeah, but there's that story about him performing an exorcism on a college classmate
I tend to want to believe that these upper-echelon religious nuts are just faking us out but I'm not so sure. We have SCOTUS justices who are in Opus Dei and several members of Congress who take part in a secret fundamentalist cabal called "The Family" so why wouldn't a weirdo Reagan-worshipper like Jindal be a True Believer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
44. ...and a biology major too
He either (a) isn't as smart as he's given credit for and didn't really learn anything during his studies or (b) is a lying sack of shit that will say anything to feed red meat to the base. I'll wager on (b).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. sorry ms parker, 'that guy' was bobby brady jindal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. He's changing his name again? Cher Nobyl
BTW..Cher's famous song Cherokee Nation was not about YOU, Bobby:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, right
It's always somehow Republicans not being able or allowed to express their true selves. Yet a throwaway line by any Democrat is assumed to be reflective of the "real" whoever it is. So, when Al Gore misstates which FEMA official he accompanied on his third trip to a disaster area (out of five trips), he's a serial liar and exaggerator who can't be trusted. When Bobby Jindal lies to America's face with a detailed story that never happened, oh, if only Bobby Jindal could be the real Bobby Jindal!

It's almost like Ms. Parker doesn't think Jindal's a big boy who can make decisions for himself. I wonder why that would be???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. So the guy is real smart, but he decided to introduce himself to America
by pretending he was just another guy. Isn't that what they call lying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hi! I'm Bobby Jindal and Happy Mardi Gras!
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 09:15 PM by givemebackmycountry
What a way to start off your BEEG speech.
Especially when you have to follow one of the most extraordinary addresses to the American people ever delivered.

Way to go Bobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Someone on 'Wait Wait Don't Tell Me" said that Jindal
sounded like he was reading "Goodnight, Moon" to the country. Not an auspicious debut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. The GOOP can have him
Here is a man who sold out his heritage, his religion and for fuck sake, even his name to get ahead in the republican party.
Who the fuck could TRUST that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. One of the WashPost's 3 newest op-ed columnists - ALL right wing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Same play, same playbook, same old same old.
Just a few scant months ago weren't all the lame rightwing pundits squawking about how the McCain campaign should "Let Sarah be Sarah"?

As for me, Kathleen Parker, the only fantasy about Jindal and the President that I have is watching Mr. Obama kick his bony ass around, either in the voting booth or better still, live and for real.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. The one reason why

Though he did graduate with a degree in biology and public policy, he didn't GO to medical school. He went and got a masters in political science ( not really a science )

I don't think he has much of a background in science, so --> raving right wing loon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. The REAL Jindal is a PROVEN LIAR. The REAL Jindal can't even tell intelligent
lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. An intellectually dishonest bullshitter. He be da man, alright!
I'll bet Parker and Bachmann visit the same pharmacist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. He's a traitor to America, just like all conservatives.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. One can fantasize?
Try fantasizing how anyone still touting the detax and deregulate policies that have brought us to the brink of the Greatest Depression is relevant?

Same old tired SHIT THAT DOES NOT WORK.

Intellectual equivalent of a tape recorder, replaying the same tired phrases endlessly.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. I would have appreciated hearing the real Bobby Jindal, if that wasn't the real him
Isn't it time we had a high minded debate on two opposing views of Government?

Instead we got this laughable, simplistic, cartoon presentation.

He did no service to himself or to his country with that ridiculous rebuttal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. What You See Is What You Get WYSIWUG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
29. I'm certainly not fantasizing about the
sort of "bi-partisianship" that she'd like to see.

If Jindal's views play any part, that's not an outcome I'd want, I can be certain of that.

And why in the world would finding some sort of compromise with Jindal's brand of extremism be a good thing?

Honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. Of course the difficulty in nuclear power is that its waste shelf-life is measured in
the many thousands of years.

Who would want it in their backyard?

There's an anti-Republican allegory in there somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
36. piyush....
....might be smart for a repug, but he's no Barack Obama....to me, he comes across most of the time as a gibbering child espousing the usual republican jibberish....

....and then there's the fact he's walked from much of his own heritage (name, religion, customs) just to become one of the good-ole boys in the good-ole Southern USA melting-pot of Louisiana....he's a fake....

....Barack Hussein Obama became an Illinois State Senator, a US Senator, a presidential candidate of the Democratic Party and then President of the United States without changing one letter of his name....genuine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
37. Haha. Chernobyl Bob - he's going continue the GOP meltdown.
Go to it, BJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
38. All these people swearing that Jindal is really so much better are actually making it worse.
The more they protest, the more they drive it into American consciousness that he is a pathetic nub.

If they were smart they would just SHUT UP and it would all blow over.

Of course, I'm glad they're not so smart. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
41. Sorry, Ms. Parker, but Jindal lied.
He didn't have to write his own speech to know that the one he was given contained falsehoods about his own purported experiences.

Epic fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
43. How smart could he be if he allowed himself to be handled so poorly? That shows he's
not a true leader but a wrong wing tool.

BTW.... he is also a frigging liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
45. Letting them put you on that leash is part of the test. Fail.
McCain might have won if he'd been the old McCain. He wouldn't have gotten our votes and he would have had to demonstrate that he had a clue about the economic situation, but as it was, his demeanor was scary. It seemed that his body was inhabited by someone else. Maybe the same is true of Bobby Jindal. That's Leadership Fail right there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
46. Kathleen Parker is the intellectual equivalent of a AAA battery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
47. Two oxymorans:
Conservative Intellectual

Modern day Republican Party

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
48. Jindal reminds me of outsourcing.......unfortunate for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
49. Out-of-date, poorly-maintained and toxic. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
50. would that be chernobyl or three mile island?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
51. Um, no thanks--Obama and Jindal are not "colleagues" of equal standing.
I love watching these Republicans try to tie nothingburger idiots like Palin and misguided weenies like Jindal to Obama, as if they're ALL cut from the same cloth. Obama is head and shoulders above them, they're not his equivalent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC