Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You don't fire racist cartoonists for drawing racist cartoons for racist "newspapers," but...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 05:26 PM
Original message
You don't fire racist cartoonists for drawing racist cartoons for racist "newspapers," but...
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 05:43 PM by BuyingThyme
... if this Santelli guy did what people are saying he did, he should not only be fired, but CNBC should sue his Puke ass into the ground for committing a fraud against their network. Either that or they should just admit that they're in on it.

Have there been any ties made yet to the Republican Party proper or to any government employees or officials?

Has CNBC even made a statement?

This is better than Bobby Jindal.


EDIT FOR LINKS:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5159165
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5158396
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5157810
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Tea_Party_protests_sees_as_corporate_0301.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Imo, it fit CNBC like a glove.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You think they're in on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not necessarily.
But the substance of the fake Santelli rant still fits their ideology. So I'm not sure how much umbrage they'll take.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Deep Capture
They also play more direct role.

http://www.deepcapture.com/category/2-the-journalists-tried-to-be-players-but-became-pawns/

“You want to know what just happened? I’ll f—ing tell you what just happened. Here’s how it works. Those two guys are part of the short-seller community. Cramer especially is part of this ring of hard-charging short-sellers on Wall Street. I’ll bet you anything that one of his buddies is short your company. Whoever it is saw your earnings release, saw you blew your numbers away, got on the phone to Cramer and said, ‘Don’t you dare let this thing start moving. Don’t you f—ing dare let this move!’ So Cramer goes on TV and screams that nonsense at you. I bet my last f—ing dollar that’s what happened. It’s been like this all my career, but it’s never been like this.”

Later that week, a fund manager who had seen the interview told me, “That was the most unprofessional interview I have ever seen in my life.” In time, others would mention it to me, so that months and even a year later, I’d meet people who said, “I saw you on with Cramer one time. That was the craziest interview I ever saw.”

That was the first time I heard the joke, but I did not get it until I heard it the second time, a few weeks later, in February, 2004, while I was in Kabul (because it is a natural next question: I was in Afghanistan searching for artisans to become suppliers for Worldstock). Our PR Director at the time, a calm, mellow Californian named “Scott,” had sent an urgent message saying that a BusinessWeek reporter, Tim Mullaney, was going to write a story attacking the price comparisons listed on Overstock’s website. Mullaney was asking about a set of products which were precisely the same products that another two reporters had called asking about that same week. Since Overstock had about 12,000 products at the time, the coincidence was odd. In addition Scott said, Mullaney was acting as though he wanted us to know he planned on writing a hatchet job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt CNBC cares...........
I wouldn't be surprised if they were in on the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. You are implying that CNBC has professional journalistic ethics
Demonstrably a false notion. The ball in in their court to prove otherwise. For a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Does NBC take any responsibility for CNBC?
If so, does NBC have any of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. So who you gonna believe-
CNBC or a blog at Playboy.com?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Logic and facts.
The blog at Playboy makes a persuasive case, so it wouldn't even matter if it were on a disreputable site, like GEM$NBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Oopsie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC