Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Had a conversation with a Fair Tax guy this weekend.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:28 AM
Original message
Had a conversation with a Fair Tax guy this weekend.
I was at a political gathering and the Fair Tax folks were there tabling. So the guy tells me this long story about his dad who was retired from the railroad and had a great pension, had never paid into Social Security and got screwed when Uncle Sam came in and decided the railroad workers needed to pay into SS. I told him the teachers in some states also don't pay into SS and every one of them that I know works part time in another job so they can get some SS when they retire. They get a little more take home pay in their paychecks but without SS, don't have as much when they retire as a worker who did pay into SS. He said well we need to make SS voluntary and let workers choose if they want to invest and where to invest their retirement money. I said what about the workers who choose NOT to invest in a retirement fund, how will they survive when they retire.

So he says well we need to make it mandatory. I said "How is that different from Social Security then?"

He paused and said "Well the system is messed up, that's for sure. Nice talking to you." And he walked away.

:rofl:

Too easy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. The problem is that the current tax system is really screwed up. Forbes' Fair Tax is not the answer
but something has to be done to simplify and streamline it. Then and only then will it be possible to have a clean progressive system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
But the Fair Tax is taking the 'solution' too far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, see, it would be coercion of a voluntary contribution
:crazy:

If you tilt your head just right, squint your eyes just so, it all becomes "fair." And after what we just witnessed in the mortgage market when an investment frenzy collides with an unregulated environment, a lot of people take it in the shorts thanks to fast-talking hustlers. It's quite unfortunate to lose your house or to suddenly be sitting in a house that's worth only a fraction of what you owe on it. How much worse is it to be on the brink of retirement, and because you wanted to make a few extra dollars in your self-financed pension someone scams you out of it entirely? Now what do you do? Work and save another 40 years so you can afford to retire in your 90s? Say "fuck it" and take the pipe? Starve in the streets while the talking chuckleheads tut-tut you on the teevee for being so greedy that you wanted a monthly pension of $1,100 instead of settling for $1,050?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hard to see anything 'fair' about it.
Well it may be fair to them. But then this is just another financial scheme where it is what's best for 'me' and not for the people as a whole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Uh, how does his "dad" now pay into SS
If he is already retired on a RR pension and never paid into SS while employed?

I'm confused.

:freak:

I am both a former federal government AND a former RR employee who is under 60 and disabled, I receive disability checks from my ex-employers and SS, and I don't see a deduction for SS on any of them.

That guy read a RW email or was just retelling a fable that someone else told him, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I was thinking that while we were talking
But he closed our conversation and walked away before I could bring it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Railroad Retirement Board's fund is an equivalent to Social Security
Retired railroad workers are well taken care of, and don't get screwed by Uncle Sam because they don't pay into Social Security.

"The Board administers a trust fund which operates at a substantial profit. In 2007, the fund recorded a net profit of $1.4 Billion, a return of 16.38% on its investment."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railroad_Retirement_Board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. So he was lying?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Imagine that?
A conservative lying to defame a public institution and garner support for privatization.

That almost never happens! LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think he contradicted himself, if I'm reading this correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Exactly
He was promoting a voluntary retirement fund and then said well it should be mandatory. And in my dictionary, 'voluntary' and 'mandatory' are opposites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. I might go for a flat tax of
10% on WEALTH of a half million, or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC