Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1,800 Individual Ready Reserve Marines may get yearlong deployment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:09 AM
Original message
1,800 Individual Ready Reserve Marines may get yearlong deployment
The Marine Corps plans to notify 1,800 Marines in the Individual Ready Reserve this month that they could be mobilized for one year, to include an expected seven-month deployment to Iraq, said Maj. Steven O’Connor, Reserve liaison officer at Headquarters Marine Corps Public Affairs.

Troops in the IRR have left active duty but still have time on their obligation to serve. Unlike other reservists, they do not drill.

Of the Marines notified, about 1,200 are expected to get orders to join the I Marine Expeditionary Force in Iraq, O’Connor said Monday.

That breaks down to 1,067 sergeants and 133 captains, said Lt. Col. Jeff Riehl, of Manpower and Reserve Affairs.

...

In August, the Corps announced that it planned to mobilize up to 2,500 Marines in the IRR to stem a shortfall of 1,200 Marines. The Corps had been relying on volunteers from the IRR, but fewer Marines in the IRR had volunteered to be mobilized.

Since then, 150 Marines in the IRR have been notified they could deploy, of which 69 have received orders to go to Iraq, O’Connor said.

http://stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=44629

The DoD keeps saying it is making recruitment quotas in all branches, so why the need for IRR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Getting ready for something bigger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. The breakdown of military occupational specialties for the 1,200 IRR members is:

-- 361 Aviation Maintenance
-- 225 Logistics and Support
-- 223 Infantry, Tanks and Artillery
-- 178 Motor Transport
-- 97 Communications
-- 95 Intelligence
-- 21 Military Police
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Highest amount is in aviation and logistics
Now, you would think that would already be handled by the air force
except in a typical marine amphibious assault unit.

Just 21 in military police, with Bagdad how it is now.
Interesting numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The army maintains its own chpppers too
those are Aviattion MOS

And each branch has logistics personnel

It tells me how broken the marines are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oh, Intel!
"Bring em on!"

I await my letter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. What do you make of the MOS's?
21 more MPs aren't going to be all that effective. The aviation maintenance...for the helos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Wing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Yet, they'll probably all end up driving trucks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. About the recruitment quotas:
They are trying to bring people back in who are already trained in certain fields (takes less time than training newbies).

New recruits are probably just front line fodder....damn f'ing shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Those new recruits are our country's future, going up in flames
cut to bits or otherwise incapacitated by schrapnel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. They have not made tehir quotas in years
take it from me, or not.. but off the record a recuriter mentioned this to us one day, and how they are fibbing the numbers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. do you know by how much, and which branches
that the numbers are being fudged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh ten here, ten there by the particular recruiting
station and that is the Navy.

But if you multiply this by all stations...

You get a pretty good idea, number fudging has been an ongoing problem...

And every so often we get almost an honest number... but rarely

Here is how they do it

We need 100 sailors from this station this month

Teh 31st arrives, they only got 90

Well we met our quota of 90 sailors... that is how the game is being played
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Congress needs to wrestle control of those numbers from Gates
and give their reporting to the media back to the individual branches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's all branches
This just happens to be a large bunch from one branch. From what I've been told the IRR are retired officers who specialize in a particular area the military is short on. They can be compelled to return to service. My brother (retired navy commander) has been re-actived for a year, involuntarily.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Gates said he would rethink stop-loss.
Once that is lifted, there will be mass exodus. I know lots that have either already separated from the army or are about to. These are folks that had planned to make the army a career. Not anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I think IRR is different from stop loss
From what i've been told officers in the IRR can be called back anytime their expertise is needed and the only way to get out of it is to resign the commission and forfit all pensions and benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes, it is different
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Hoo-rah.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC