Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BOMBSHELL from W. Post on White House politicization at GSA!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:27 AM
Original message
BOMBSHELL from W. Post on White House politicization at GSA!
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 08:38 AM by kpete
BOMBSHELL from W. Post on White House politicization at GSA!
Sun Mar 25, 2007 at 09:01:46 PM PDT


GSA Chief Is Accused of Playing Politics
Doan Denies 'Improper' Use of Agency for GOP


By Scott Higham and Robert O'Harrow Jr.
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, March 26, 2007; Page A01

Witnesses have told congressional investigators that the chief of the General Services Administration and a deputy in Karl Rove's political affairs office at the White House joined in a videoconference earlier this year with top GSA political appointees, who discussed ways to help Republican candidates.

With GSA Administrator Lurita Alexis Doan and up to 40 regional administrators on hand, J. Scott Jennings, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, gave a PowerPoint presentation on Jan. 26 of polling data about the 2006 elections.

................

When Jennings concluded his presentation to the GSA political appointees, Doan allegedly asked them how they could "help 'our candidates' in the next elections," according to a March 6 letter to Doan from Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Waxman said in the letter that one method suggested was using "targeted public events, such as the opening of federal facilities around the country."

On Wednesday, Doan is scheduled to appear before Waxman's committee to answer questions about the videoconference and other issues. The committee is investigating whether remarks made during the videoconference violated the Hatch Act, a federal law that restricts executive-branch employees from using their positions for political purposes. Those found in violation of the act do not face criminal penalties but can be removed from their jobs.


So we have proof that arms of the executive branch were actively working to harm political opponents and help allies.

more at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/25/AR2007032501048.html
via:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/3/25/234756/254


Waxman's letter to Doan http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/pdf/waxman_letter_030607.pdf. It includes allegations of a discussion among the political appointees about how to push Speaker Pelosi (this is January 2007) out of a courthouse opening in CA and how to include Sen. Mel Martinez at a ceremony in FL. The hearings on Wednesday should be interesting, to say the least.

Waxman's requesting all the documents:
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/pdf/waxman_letter_030607.pdf



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are all republicons corrupt cronies?
Is there not even one honest republicon?

Why do the republicons hate America?

Why do republicons lie, and steal, and cheat America over and over?

Why are republicons all so amoral?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. In order: yes, no, they're evil, see previous answer, see previous answer
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
51. 100% on your test answers. Bravo!
I do believe that being corrupt is a necessary element before they let you into their cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. No.
But, the ones who aren't are in survival mode.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. There must be *some* honest Republicans, no?
It's pathetic that one has to ponder for quite a while to even come up with possibilities.

....

Um, Hagel? He's honest, kind of, isn't he?

....

....

I guess I already said Hagel, right?

....

Wait! Wasn't "Honest Abe" a Republican? There's one right there! Oh, that's right, he's dead. Really thought I had one that time.

....

Dang. I have this feeling there's one more possibility but I can't quite think of who it is. Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Hagel, the previous owner of ES&S, vote machine company that gave him 80% return?
That Hagel? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. Actually, it was 83% -- THAT Hagel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. That makes me laugh 3% harder! Or, cry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
33. Lincoln Chafee
Of course, he's gone now. Only the good Republicans get kicked out of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. Ron Paul? Yea, I know he's really not a republic, but he does have the label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
49. This guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Well there is one Arnie but only in part, his Kennedy wife has her good influence on him...
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 09:29 AM by cooolandrew
I mean you have to hand to Arnie on the Environment at least, also he apparently said Limbaugh was irrelevant. It's a move in the right direction at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Arnie, the one who settled the $9 billion lawsuit against TX energy companies for pennies
on the dollar? That Arnie? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
53. John Anderson, Chuck Percy,
and several others. but no modern day GOPers that I can recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Let me know when he changes parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. Ron Paul?
But he's not really a Republican, just tags along for lack of a better forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. So does this mean the "missing W keys" story might not have been true?
:wow:

Say it ain't so!

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Speaking of...
Don't you just love how almost all of these bastards use an initial as part of their name?

"J. Scott Jennings", etc.

Do you think they called him J. Scott back in school?

I think that it is part of the Cult of W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Like I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby?
I keep thinking of "I Claudius" when I see "I. Lewis"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Yeah, but with Scooter....
...his first name is IRVING. Do you blame him for making that an initial???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Pretentious little twits.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. What is the 'missing W keys'?
Probably I have read it, but my brain is confused :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Back in 01
When * moved into the WH. They made claims about the Clintons and staff trashing the big house. There was a story that was all over the airwaves about how they had removed all the "W" buttons from the keyboards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Not just removing the "W"s from keyboards
They also claimed that the White House was trashed - as in criminally ransacked. This was shrieked all over the airwaves for weeks by Rush, Savage, Hannity, etc.

The GAO later determined there was no truth to the story and that the White House was in the normal condition you'd expect after somebody had just moved out after 8 years...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Ah, I remember that now, Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Gotta love Henry! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry but...
A Republicon being corrupt isn't a "Bombshell" anymore. Maybe finding one that isn't would be though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. RW scandal du jour.
Nothing to see here folks, move along.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
32. when all appointees are Party Cronies -- eventually scandal will rise to the surface
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. remember when ostensibly lots of federal employees were sent GOP campaigning?
It was in the papers. henry just followed the news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
52. That is such a beaurtiful quote - a cat in every tree and a subpoena on every doorstep
There are surely some very nervous repugs out there today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. Save me some time, please...What exactly does GSA do?
(dumb question, I know)

Okay, on a certain level I can understand the WH as the 'leader' of the party communicating with others how they can help. But when the 'discussion' goes to a level of manipulating in a PR strategy like this is saying...there's something that goes beyond just seriously wrong.

Sorry, but MY tax dollars should not be used in this way. If I wanted "my money" to go to smearing and ostracizing Democrats, or even just to provide an advantage in support of Republicans then I'd be sending dollars to the RNC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. k&r - they are all criminals are need to be jailed permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. So when they say Dems hate America they mean Dems hate GOPers
because the RNC and the American Government are so intertwined, they are now one unit.

The only Democrats in the American Government are those we elected. Everyone else in the government is a GOPer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Cool you put it that way because Hartmann once said...
... that voters of the GOP define themselves as Republicans and so when we used to say the Republican party they associated personally. That's why I tend to always say GOP or bush supporters. Hartmann tends to be 100 percent on the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. Holy crap...
...BushCo makes the Nixon Admin look like a Baptist Ladies' Tea Social. What the heck is gonna be next???? Wow ~~ WaPo, Page A01. Hello impeachment! I think the more that comes out, the more it looks likely and possible.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Yeah, we knew it was bad from outside sources, but once you get more info they shock you more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. They have infected every institution they touched
What a fugging bunch of criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. My guess is, if they hold enough hearings they will find scandal on every republican in congress.
Edited on Mon Mar-26-07 09:39 AM by cooolandrew
One representative is quoted as saying, '' We've been holding hearings for several weeks and every tree we have shaken there is a car'' a fat cat at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. I suspect you are correct
This is the most corrupt bunch in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
23. There is a cancer growing on the presidency and it's name is
President Bush. It's not that these guys are creative in finding new ways to manipulate the system to their advantage. They're finding old ways that other people never used because it was illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
30. Bush/Blair will attack Iran within the month...if nothing else, to clear the headlines
Oh..and to secure the oil.

To stop Iran from revaluing its oil in Euros instead of dollars (Venezuala, Syria, your next)

To mask fading Saudi oil production.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=503509&mesg_id=503509

To make a few more billion for Halliburtion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
35. Sigh! Another scandal another day. k(pete)nr! ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
36. The WHOLE General Services Administration ?
It looks to me like they subverted the entire GSA and used them as an RNC adjunct committee. With the Chief, a Deputy from Rove's office and 40 (Forty!!) regional administrators!!!

Is this slightly larger than the average scam, even for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. For six years they only hired GOPers in each and every dept of the government
Remember last year when Jefferson of HHS even said it out loud forgetting he was talking to a non-GOPer.

The only Dems in DC these days are the ones we voted in. Even K street had to go out and beat the bushes to hire some non GOPers when the Dems took control.

You ask if this is not a larger scam. It is not a larger scam. It is just one department here. If you could watch videos of their other department meetings you would probably find the exact same thing going on in each and every department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
38. Doan did nothing wrong yet...
"In several recent statements, Doan has said she did nothing wrong. She said her troubles are the result of retaliation by the inspector general over her efforts to rein in spending and balance the GSA budget. Doan, a wealthy former government contractor who sold her company before taking over the GSA last May, has hired three law firms and two media relations companies at her own expense to handle inquiries from the federal investigators and the news media."




Like you do when you're innocent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
50. A wealthy former government contractor?
Did she earn her wealth from government contracts? What kind of contracts, I wonder. Who got her the contracts? Quid pro quo.

Follow the money ............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
39. The politicization of intelligence agencies is even more frightening
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=506213&mesg_id=506213

Answer THAT question and you end up going into the CIA, NSA, and FBI politicization...

Which tie into the NYC pre convention intelligence gathering on legitimate dissenters...

and guess where the CIA is stationing its illegal domestic spying operations ? Denver, where Dems hold their '08 convention

CIA Plans to Shift Work to Denver
Domestic Division Would Be Moved

By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 6, 2005; Page A21
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/05/AR2005050501860.html

There's legitimate spying and illigitimate spying. We'll never know which "they" plan for unless we ask, in Congress, under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
41. Investigate! Indict! Prosecute! Convict!
:mad: :grr: :grr: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. Evereything this admin DOES violates the Hatch Act
And that's a fact. There IS no other reason to do anything, in their minds, unless it results in political advantage (and/or $$ advantage for their wealthy friends).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. CNN just ran the story, and included a segment on Gore's WH phone calls,
specifically mentioning the Hatch Act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theothersnippywshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
46. Bush politicized every federal agency from the start of his reign.
From the 30 July 2003 Issue of the Wall Street Journal:
Oregon Water Saga Illuminates Rove's Methods With Agencies

TOM HAMBURGER
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
July 30, 2003

WASHINGTON -- In a darkened conference room, White House political strategist Karl Rove was making an unusual address to 50 top managers at the U.S. Interior Department. Flashing color slides, he spoke of poll results, critical constituencies -- and water levels in the Klamath River basin.

. . .

Though Mr. Rove's clout within the administration often is celebrated, this episode offers a rare window into how he works behind the scenes to get things done. One of them is with periodic visits to cabinet departments. Over the past two years Mr. Rove or his top aide, Kenneth Mehlman -- now manager of Mr. Bush's re-election campaign -- have visited nearly every agency to outline White House campaign priorities, review polling data and, on occasion, call attention to tight House, Senate and gubernatorial races that could be affected by regulatory action.

Every administration has used cabinet resources to promote its election interests. But some presidential scholars and former federal and White House officials say the systematic presentation of polling data and campaign strategy goes beyond what Mr. Rove's predecessors have done.

"We met together and talked a lot about issues of the day, but never in relation to polling results, specific campaigns or the president's popularity," says Lisa Guide, a political appointee at Interior during the Clinton administration. Frank Donatelli, political director in the Reagan White House, says "we were circumspect about discussing specific administration rulings that had yet to be made."

. . .
http://www.pcffa.org/RoveWSJ07-30-03.htm

Substituting polling data for statutory criteria for fulfilling statutory responsibilities. How very republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. Let's just hope they put her under oath!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
54. we've been saying that the GOPers are corrupt for years now.
the only difference is that the message is getting out into the public. And they are responding with nods and recognition of how bad things have become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC