Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I certainly never demanded bipartisanship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:31 PM
Original message
I certainly never demanded bipartisanship
I did not mind the idea of working with the other side, listening to their ideas, but at no time did I demand that Republicans be integrated into what I fully expected to be a Democratic Administration. Enough of this shit is enough, there are 3 of them now. That's a guarantee of 3 Agencies at which Republicans who have been planted in the civil service will not only avoid being rooted out, you can expect them to flourish. That is a pity, just a plain and simple god damned pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Remember, not everybody who voted for Obama was a Democrat
To be President, he has to be bipartisan.

That's what the job calls for.

That's where Dubya, the miserable failure, went wrong.

It's up to the congress and senate to be partisan; to represent the local interest of the Congressional districts and of the states.

It's up to Obama to crystallize that into "The Will of the People of the United States".

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and a well stated opinion it is
I can accept your argument but I think it is weak. Where it is weak, in my estimation, is that even those Republicans who voted for Obama did so expecting that if he won, well, then it would be Democrats who won with the quite reasonable result that they would take high office themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I can see where you're coming from, and I have no problem with that
The point I want to make, and the one we have to keep in mind, is that Obama is already looking at 2012, and the votes he will need to get re-elected.

That only makes sense.

We should not be lulled into a false sense of security because we elected a Democratic President.

We should continue to, vociferously, advocate our progressive agenda.

It is up to us to focus his attention on the issues that matter to us now.

Do not expect to rest, and let Obama carry the burden for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And while Obama is being Mr. Nice guy...
the repukes are saying 'hell no' every step of the way. Obama goes up to the hill and they give him the basic 'fuck you very much' for his effort.

The repukes wanted more tax breaks...they got them. The repukes whined about birth control and the funding was yanked. They bitched about repairing the grass down at the mall (which would have created jobs) and Obama took it out. The repukes still refused to support even after Obama gave in.

There is no compromising when one side refuses to compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 2012...
That's Obama's focus, 2012.

If that means thowing the pugs a bone, that's what he will do.

He is not the President of the Democratic Party, he is the President of the United States.

Let's try to keep that in mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. that should not be his focus...
He wasn't elected to campaign for 2012.

He was elected to fix the economy and get us out of Iraq. That's what he should be doing. Fuck the repukes.

If he does his job correctly, then 2012 will happen. If he doesn't...he's out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. And yet...
The 2008 election is history.

He is, necessarily, looking to the next election.

Our job is to remind him what the price of our vote in 2012 will be.

And we will have to decide between a 2nd Obama administration and a Palin/Joe the Plumber Administration...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. So you think birth control, and replacing grass...
were deal breakers? The Republicans are not the minority. They have the media, which creates perception, and people are more than willing to follow their lead. How many people do you think have contacted Republican elected officials about the stimulus package?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. if he keeps extending his hand over & over only to have it slapped away
then's it's the GOP that looks churlish (they already do, but not to everyone). he's backing them into a corner & the 3 GOP appointees are the only ones smart enough to save their own skins.

eventually, they'll have to take his hand. but the current GOP leadership (boehner, mcconnell) will be overthrown first.

which is perfectly fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC