|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:39 AM Original message |
OUTRAGE RETURNS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. Obama didn't give in to any tax breaks. The bill actually has less tax cuts than when Obama sent it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. More info please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. When Obama sent it to Congress. Tax Cuts were about 40% of the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. Perhaps the long view, the one that Obama took to win the nomination and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:50 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. After all the "compromises" he made, not even 1 repuke voted for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. They really weren't compromises, were they??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:10 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. I beleive that the compromises were on things that he knew from the start he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
48. My thoughts exactly.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 05:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
50. i agree...i am enjoying this, and i will continue to enjoy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:03 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Obama'd.....lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Yeah, Obama definitely knows what he's doing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:07 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. I love how he does that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:12 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. It's like he sees all of this as a chess board... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:11 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. yup. I believe you are right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
livvy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 06:47 AM Response to Reply #18 |
35. Like in The Sting...Newman/Redford/Shaw. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. Exactly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 08:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
38. Love it, but maybe we could spell it "Obama3d," on the pattern of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
22. well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:32 AM Response to Reply #22 |
23. How's this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:52 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. That's what I'm talking about!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 03:01 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Thank you JW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pryderi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 08:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
39. True. Obama already has the GOP shackled to "The Limbaugh" and will toss them all over the side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:49 AM Response to Original message |
3. and it has to be reconciled with the Senate version...so it might end up even better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
4. Because the DLC is there to move the Democratic Party to the right . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. I don't think you are right about any of this, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. DLC is the corporate-wing of the Democratic Party . . .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undergroundpanther (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:25 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. The DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:38 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. That's pretty much it ---- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
7. Unfortunately . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Tiger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
11. It's been a week for God's sake! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undergroundpanther (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
20. I dunno |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
26. So this was all planned, ey? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 03:08 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Just think about it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
misanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 03:18 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I'll believe he was using that complete strategy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 03:39 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Hasn't he already given us proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wielding Truth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 05:58 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Like hardliners they had their chance and blew it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 09:47 AM Response to Reply #32 |
43. Reading your post I just got a flash and said "healthcare" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 03:20 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. can you make this an original post? Obama'd... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 04:20 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Okay, did it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 07:55 AM Response to Reply #28 |
36. compromise = you give some, you get some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 03:13 AM Response to Original message |
29. I totally agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
37. At the risk of flirting with Godwin's Law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
40. And yet, no republicans voted for the bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
41. And We Lost What??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalPersona (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
42. I'm getting the impression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
45. This will backfire on them. Obama made the concessions, then they backstabbed him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
46. i'm currenty watching the wh press briefing...the media wants to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
47. Caving into the right wing has become a habit not yet (if ever) broken. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
49. I think "FUCK YOU IN THE FACE" is the phrase of the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
51. Wha? Chill out! I think you are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
52. Remember that Republicans voted against Social Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC