Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"At least he kept us safe"???? What about Clinton foiling the Millennium plot in 2000?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:34 PM
Original message
"At least he kept us safe"???? What about Clinton foiling the Millennium plot in 2000?
I swear if one more fucking Bush apologist spews that talking point via the MSM, I'm gonna put my fist thru the TV. How can we allow this shit to continually be framed and parsed like this? BushCo were incompetent fools, clowns who ignored 52 security briefings from March to Sept of 2001 warning about Al Qaida using airplanes for terrorist attacks. That's 2 briefings a week! What would it have taken? A hammer to the head???

Whereas these blowhards who insist Bush was so fucking great on Terra and kept us safe (except when he didn't) are NEVER challenged by the MSM: Clinton really did keep us safe from the Millennium bomb plot New Year's 2000. The Clinton administration actually listened to the chatter on Echelon, and foiled the plot without ever infringing on our civil rights. And that was 8 years ago--the technology is vastly improved from then.

So sick of these fucking hacks who spread propaganda to the low-info Americans! Their feet should be held to the fire, and they should be made to do their fucking JOBS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Saying that Bush kept us safe
because their has been no attack since 9/11 is like saying the security in my building is great because 'I only got mugged in the elevator that one time'.

And I can't get started on the increased threat because so many more people now hate us, the fact that our rights have been under constant attack, an so on, and so on, and so on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. oh, I've debated the numbnuts before and asked them the same
question - what about Clinton's success in foiling the millennium attack.

Their response is, that wasn't Clinton, that was just by sheer luck, a well trained cop doing his job. nothing more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. they keep on saying bush keep us safe for 7 years.
but we can come back and say he did not keep us safe for 8 years!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. there tens of thousands of injured and dead Americans for nothing, thanks to bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pretty cold comfort there. Common sense would tell you that a
plot like 9/11 is probably generational. In the meantime the whole economy has been dragged into the toilet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. That doesn't count Monica Lewinsky Vince Foster!11!11!1!1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. I thought it was our guns that kept us safe
Does that mean if we keep the "Torture pResident" and all his lackeys we can get rid of all the guns? Why would we need them if Republicans can keep us all safe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, not one pundit seems to recall that or ask if Clinton "kept us safe" as well.
:kick:
It's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Long ago, BartCop told us how to answer this
BartCop suggests that Bush and Bin Laden made a mutual "hands-off" pact: If Bush would let Bin Laden stay free, Osama wouldn't attack in the U.S.

The proof of that is that there has NOT been a terrorism attack in the U.S.

But that's not because of Bush: it CAN'T be, when all it would take for a terrorist attack is one 'suicider' stealing a tanker truck and crashing it into a school or a mall or a public event.

Surely, BartCop reasoned, there are at least three suicide-ready terrorists in this country. Surely, they have connections to Osama, can get orders from him. Surely, given the word, they could begin to crash tankers or poison water supplies starting tomorrow and there's no way the Dept of Homeland Security could do a thing to prevent it.

Surely, all those facts are indisputable. So why haven't there been such attacks? The only possible reason is that Osama doesn't not WANT to attack us.

Why not?

Well, he's still free, ain't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. How do they manage to forget that
BUSH was occupying the White HOuse when we were attacked on our soil? How exactly does he escape any responsibility for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh., No, no, no, no.....
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 02:50 PM by Gman
they don't want to talk about that. They claim it was all a lie anyway. That blows the entire Clinton ignored terrorism argument and by extension, Monica never gave Bill a blow job and the entire thing falls apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC