Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mitch McConnell wants to "reform" Social Security.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:46 PM
Original message
Mitch McConnell wants to "reform" Social Security.....
How come when McConnell says "reform", I see Social Security disappearing? McConnell is on C-SPAN Re-Run... says Baby Boomers who paid into the program all their lives are not entitled to large chunks of SS and Medicare.

Oh.. I see Mr. Mitch, I guess our money would be much better in the hands of you and your Republican cronies on Wall Street, rather than wasted on people who need food, shelter and medical care.

(snip)http://www.bigmoneymitch.com/node/11

A close look at McConnell's campaign finance data reveals why McConnell may be so energetic in pushing to privatize the retirement savings of Kentucky's workforce. Private accounts would have to be managed by investment professionals, and securities and investment interests have given McConnell $1,494,712 throughout his political career. <4> In the 2008 cycle alone, they have given him $644,786, twice as much as he received in 2006 ($311,438) and almost three times as much as in 2002 ($239,811) – his last election year, when contributions generally peak. If McConnell and others succeed in privatizing Social Security, this will have been a very lucrative investment – for McConnell's donors, not his constituents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. It will never end with these assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, he does, does he?
Why am I not surprised?

Good grief.

They just don't get it...

They don't give a damn about the rest of us.

Fuck him.

:nuke: :grr: :nuke: :grr: :nuke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He had his shot for 12 years to 'reform' ANYTHING.
I see a massive EPIC fail on his part.

so I say this to you, Mr. McConnell..... FOAD!

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Poor Mitch must not have been paying attention when his Ex Boss tried to push this idea.
As I recall, it wasn't very well received!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. another bought & paid for stinking politician. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Mitch Mcconnell needs to stay the hell out of Social Security
If the repugs had their way it would be completely destroyed by now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republicans see a large pool of money like an obese person sees candy
They cant help themselves, its something in their genes that makes them think they have a right to take whatever they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Reform" among Republicans means..."let me take your money for nothing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Stop raiding it! I read somewhere that every Administration since Reagan has raided SS trust fund.
:grr: Where is that 'lockbox' when we need it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. By the terms of the original Social Security legislation, all excess monies
SS collects MUST be borrowed by the Treasury in exchange for US securities.

No one raided the money; they did exactly what the legislation prescribes.

Gore was disingenuous in his "lock-box" talk.

The government isn't a private household, it's the guarantor of the entire economic system; it can't squirrel away money into a safety deposit box earning x% interest except by doing exactly what it does: borrowing surplus, spending it, & issuing securities for later redemption.

The problem is the Reagan-era legislation that raised SS tax rates too far above the rate needed to finance retirees. Every year from 1983 on the excess revenue from SS tax collections increased, meaning more $$ from SS borrowed into the general budget, meaning more IOUs in the trust fund.

Then 30 years later with 2.3 trillion in outstanding SS securities, the jackals can say, "oh, gee, it's so much, impossible to repay!"


The original sin was the initial excess taxation above need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good thing they didn't privatize it, eh? Al Gore and his lockbox--he was right. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. !
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. For fucks sake ...I hate that sorry excuse for a piece of shit asscarrot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Still? WTF is wrong with the GOPers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ah, any way to hurt regular Americans is okay with them. Happy karma.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. I have a solution: any politician calling for the "reform" (read: GOP reform) of SocSec ...
... forfeits his pension.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. I keep thinking of a snipped from a speech Obama made during the campaign.
"If Senator McCain is elected, we'll have another president who wants to privatize part of your Social Security. Could you imagine if you had your Social Security invested in the stock market these last two weeks, these last two months? You wouldn't need Social Security. You'd be having a -- like, what was it, Sanford and Son. `I'm coming Weezie!"

(yes, poor Obama got Sanford's wife mixed up with Weezie from the Jeffersons. :P)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldnslo Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Keep "Mitch, Georgie's Bitch" the Hell away from SS.
He is poison, evil, carrion, arghhhh! He would starve us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. Anything a Republican is for I'm against.........
In this day and age supporting anything a Republican supports is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. Mitch McConnell should be reformed out of the senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. didn't he just get re-elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC